McAfee-Secured Website

Exam Bundle

Exam Code: 350-701

Exam Name Implementing and Operating Cisco Security Core Technologies

Certification Provider: Cisco

Corresponding Certifications: CCIE Security , CCNP Security

Cisco 350-701 Bundle $44.99

100% Cisco 350-701 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real 350-701 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    350-701 Questions & Answers

    789 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual 350-701 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • 350-701 Video Course

    350-701 Video Course

    299 Video Lectures

    350-701 Video Course is developed by Cisco Professionals to help you pass the 350-701 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Implementing and Operating Cisco Security Core Technologies exam.
  • Study Guide

    350-701 Study Guide

    701 PDF Pages

    Developed by industry experts, this 701-page guide spells out in painstaking detail all of the information you need to ace 350-701 exam.

Implementing and Operating Cisco Security Core Technologies (350-701) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $194.97
Bundle Price: $149.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    789 Questions

    $124.99
  • 350-701 Video Course

    Video Course

    299 Video Lectures

    $39.99
  • Study Guide

    Study Guide

    701 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Cisco 350-701 Practice Test 39

Question 380

During a cross-team security policy review at Harbor Point Medical, engineers say that they resolved this finding: A network engineer copies a benchmark recommendation that would disable a required feature without review. Which result provides the STRONGEST acceptance evidence?

  1. Configuration checks show obsolete services disabled and authorized SSH administration working.
  2. A deliberately changed hardening setting is flagged with device, control, and owner.
  3. The benchmark review records justified exceptions and verified protection for retained services.
  4. Legacy community access fails and authorized encrypted monitoring succeeds.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

The benchmark review records justified exceptions and verified protection for retained services. This is the decisive evidence for the original problem: A network engineer copies a benchmark recommendation that would disable a required feature without review. It verifies that the intended corrective control—Apply hardening with documented applicability, exceptions, and compensating controls—works in the relevant environment; a completed change ticket alone would not prove the outcome at Harbor Point Medical.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Configuration checks show obsolete services disabled and authorized SSH administration working. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: A Cisco IOS XE router exposes legacy unauthenticated administration services in its baseline configuration, usually addressed by Apply hardening guidance to disable unnecessary services and use encrypted authenticated management. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Harbor Point Medical was resolved. The specific required evidence is: The benchmark review records justified exceptions and verified protection for retained services.

B:

A deliberately changed hardening setting is flagged with device, control, and owner. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: Security benchmarks are checked only once during installation and later drift goes unnoticed, usually addressed by Automate recurring compliance scans and review deviations through change management. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Harbor Point Medical was resolved. The specific required evidence is: The benchmark review records justified exceptions and verified protection for retained services.

D:

Legacy community access fails and authorized encrypted monitoring succeeds. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: A switch exposes writable SNMP community strings and weak credentials to the production network, usually addressed by Replace insecure monitoring settings with SNMPv3 authentication and privacy plus ACL restrictions. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Harbor Point Medical was resolved. The specific required evidence is: The benchmark review records justified exceptions and verified protection for retained services.

Question 381

At Blue Haven Media, during an application modernization project, the security team is examining media production and contractor access. The finding is: A device accepts management connections from every routed subnet even though only a jump host should administer it. Which action BEST addresses this specific security issue?

  1. Replace insecure monitoring settings with SNMPv3 authentication and privacy plus ACL restrictions.
  2. Harden time synchronization, logging destinations, and log access with documented retention.
  3. Automate recurring compliance scans and review deviations through change management.
  4. Restrict management-plane access using ACLs or supported trusted-host controls.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Restrict management-plane access using ACLs or supported trusted-host controls. This directly addresses the documented failure: A device accepts management connections from every routed subnet even though only a jump host should administer it. For the Blue Haven Media environment, the measurable success condition is: Unauthorized subnets cannot open management sessions while the approved jump host succeeds. This control targets the specific failure rather than merely changing an unrelated security setting.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Replace insecure monitoring settings with SNMPv3 authentication and privacy plus ACL restrictions. That action fits another problem: A switch exposes writable SNMP community strings and weak credentials to the production network. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Blue Haven Media: A device accepts management connections from every routed subnet even though only a jump host should administer it. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Restrict management-plane access using ACLs or supported trusted-host controls.

B:

Harden time synchronization, logging destinations, and log access with documented retention. That action fits another problem: An organization enables syslog but ignores local clock integrity and log retention in its network hardening profile. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Blue Haven Media: A device accepts management connections from every routed subnet even though only a jump host should administer it. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Restrict management-plane access using ACLs or supported trusted-host controls.

C:

Automate recurring compliance scans and review deviations through change management. That action fits another problem: Security benchmarks are checked only once during installation and later drift goes unnoticed. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Blue Haven Media: A device accepts management connections from every routed subnet even though only a jump host should administer it. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Restrict management-plane access using ACLs or supported trusted-host controls.

Question 382

At Blue Haven Media, a team reports that it corrected the following problem affecting media production and contractor access: A device accepts management connections from every routed subnet even though only a jump host should administer it. Which observation BEST verifies that the correction actually worked?

  1. Unauthorized subnets cannot open management sessions while the approved jump host succeeds.
  2. Legacy community access fails and authorized encrypted monitoring succeeds.
  3. Logs retain reliable timestamps and administrators can verify secure centralized delivery.
  4. A deliberately changed hardening setting is flagged with device, control, and owner.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Unauthorized subnets cannot open management sessions while the approved jump host succeeds. This is the decisive evidence for the original problem: A device accepts management connections from every routed subnet even though only a jump host should administer it. It verifies that the intended corrective control—Restrict management-plane access using ACLs or supported trusted-host controls—works in the relevant environment; a completed change ticket alone would not prove the outcome at Blue Haven Media.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Legacy community access fails and authorized encrypted monitoring succeeds. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: A switch exposes writable SNMP community strings and weak credentials to the production network, usually addressed by Replace insecure monitoring settings with SNMPv3 authentication and privacy plus ACL restrictions. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Blue Haven Media was resolved. The specific required evidence is: Unauthorized subnets cannot open management sessions while the approved jump host succeeds.

C:

Logs retain reliable timestamps and administrators can verify secure centralized delivery. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: An organization enables syslog but ignores local clock integrity and log retention in its network hardening profile, usually addressed by Harden time synchronization, logging destinations, and log access with documented retention. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Blue Haven Media was resolved. The specific required evidence is: Unauthorized subnets cannot open management sessions while the approved jump host succeeds.

D:

A deliberately changed hardening setting is flagged with device, control, and owner. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: Security benchmarks are checked only once during installation and later drift goes unnoticed, usually addressed by Automate recurring compliance scans and review deviations through change management. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Blue Haven Media was resolved. The specific required evidence is: Unauthorized subnets cannot open management sessions while the approved jump host succeeds.

Question 383

A security engineer at Oceanview Payments reviews regulated payments and credentialed access as part of a privileged access assessment. The observed problem is: A device accepts management connections from every routed subnet even though only a jump host should administer it. What is the BEST corrective action?

  1. Replace insecure monitoring settings with SNMPv3 authentication and privacy plus ACL restrictions.
  2. Apply hardening guidance to disable unnecessary services and use encrypted authenticated management.
  3. Restrict management-plane access using ACLs or supported trusted-host controls.
  4. Replace or disable defaults and enforce individual least-privilege management identities.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Restrict management-plane access using ACLs or supported trusted-host controls. This directly addresses the documented failure: A device accepts management connections from every routed subnet even though only a jump host should administer it. For the Oceanview Payments environment, the measurable success condition is: Unauthorized subnets cannot open management sessions while the approved jump host succeeds. This control targets the specific failure rather than merely changing an unrelated security setting.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Replace insecure monitoring settings with SNMPv3 authentication and privacy plus ACL restrictions. That action fits another problem: A switch exposes writable SNMP community strings and weak credentials to the production network. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Oceanview Payments: A device accepts management connections from every routed subnet even though only a jump host should administer it. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Restrict management-plane access using ACLs or supported trusted-host controls.

B:

Apply hardening guidance to disable unnecessary services and use encrypted authenticated management. That action fits another problem: A Cisco IOS XE router exposes legacy unauthenticated administration services in its baseline configuration. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Oceanview Payments: A device accepts management connections from every routed subnet even though only a jump host should administer it. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Restrict management-plane access using ACLs or supported trusted-host controls.

D:

Replace or disable defaults and enforce individual least-privilege management identities. That action fits another problem: A security appliance retains vendor default accounts and shared passwords across multiple deployments. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Oceanview Payments: A device accepts management connections from every routed subnet even though only a jump host should administer it. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Restrict management-plane access using ACLs or supported trusted-host controls.

Question 384

During a privileged access assessment at Oceanview Payments, engineers say that they resolved this finding: A device accepts management connections from every routed subnet even though only a jump host should administer it. Which result provides the STRONGEST acceptance evidence?

  1. Configuration checks show obsolete services disabled and authorized SSH administration working.
  2. Credential audits find no active default logins and every change is attributable.
  3. Unauthorized subnets cannot open management sessions while the approved jump host succeeds.
  4. Legacy community access fails and authorized encrypted monitoring succeeds.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Unauthorized subnets cannot open management sessions while the approved jump host succeeds. This is the decisive evidence for the original problem: A device accepts management connections from every routed subnet even though only a jump host should administer it. It verifies that the intended corrective control—Restrict management-plane access using ACLs or supported trusted-host controls—works in the relevant environment; a completed change ticket alone would not prove the outcome at Oceanview Payments.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Configuration checks show obsolete services disabled and authorized SSH administration working. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: A Cisco IOS XE router exposes legacy unauthenticated administration services in its baseline configuration, usually addressed by Apply hardening guidance to disable unnecessary services and use encrypted authenticated management. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Oceanview Payments was resolved. The specific required evidence is: Unauthorized subnets cannot open management sessions while the approved jump host succeeds.

B:

Credential audits find no active default logins and every change is attributable. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: A security appliance retains vendor default accounts and shared passwords across multiple deployments, usually addressed by Replace or disable defaults and enforce individual least-privilege management identities. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Oceanview Payments was resolved. The specific required evidence is: Unauthorized subnets cannot open management sessions while the approved jump host succeeds.

D:

Legacy community access fails and authorized encrypted monitoring succeeds. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: A switch exposes writable SNMP community strings and weak credentials to the production network, usually addressed by Replace insecure monitoring settings with SNMPv3 authentication and privacy plus ACL restrictions. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Oceanview Payments was resolved. The specific required evidence is: Unauthorized subnets cannot open management sessions while the approved jump host succeeds.

Question 385

At Lakeview Insurance, during a scheduled security controls review, the security team is examining broker applications and claims workflows. The finding is: An organization enables syslog but ignores local clock integrity and log retention in its network hardening profile. Which action BEST addresses this specific security issue?

  1. Apply hardening guidance to disable unnecessary services and use encrypted authenticated management.
  2. Replace insecure monitoring settings with SNMPv3 authentication and privacy plus ACL restrictions.
  3. Harden time synchronization, logging destinations, and log access with documented retention.
  4. Automate recurring compliance scans and review deviations through change management.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Harden time synchronization, logging destinations, and log access with documented retention. This directly addresses the documented failure: An organization enables syslog but ignores local clock integrity and log retention in its network hardening profile. For the Lakeview Insurance environment, the measurable success condition is: Logs retain reliable timestamps and administrators can verify secure centralized delivery. This control targets the specific failure rather than merely changing an unrelated security setting.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Apply hardening guidance to disable unnecessary services and use encrypted authenticated management. That action fits another problem: A Cisco IOS XE router exposes legacy unauthenticated administration services in its baseline configuration. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Lakeview Insurance: An organization enables syslog but ignores local clock integrity and log retention in its network hardening profile. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Harden time synchronization, logging destinations, and log access with documented retention.

B:

Replace insecure monitoring settings with SNMPv3 authentication and privacy plus ACL restrictions. That action fits another problem: A switch exposes writable SNMP community strings and weak credentials to the production network. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Lakeview Insurance: An organization enables syslog but ignores local clock integrity and log retention in its network hardening profile. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Harden time synchronization, logging destinations, and log access with documented retention.

D:

Automate recurring compliance scans and review deviations through change management. That action fits another problem: Security benchmarks are checked only once during installation and later drift goes unnoticed. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Lakeview Insurance: An organization enables syslog but ignores local clock integrity and log retention in its network hardening profile. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Harden time synchronization, logging destinations, and log access with documented retention.

Question 386

At Lakeview Insurance, a team reports that it corrected the following problem affecting broker applications and claims workflows: An organization enables syslog but ignores local clock integrity and log retention in its network hardening profile. Which observation BEST verifies that the correction actually worked?

  1. Logs retain reliable timestamps and administrators can verify secure centralized delivery.
  2. Configuration checks show obsolete services disabled and authorized SSH administration working.
  3. Legacy community access fails and authorized encrypted monitoring succeeds.
  4. A deliberately changed hardening setting is flagged with device, control, and owner.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Logs retain reliable timestamps and administrators can verify secure centralized delivery. This is the decisive evidence for the original problem: An organization enables syslog but ignores local clock integrity and log retention in its network hardening profile. It verifies that the intended corrective control—Harden time synchronization, logging destinations, and log access with documented retention—works in the relevant environment; a completed change ticket alone would not prove the outcome at Lakeview Insurance.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Configuration checks show obsolete services disabled and authorized SSH administration working. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: A Cisco IOS XE router exposes legacy unauthenticated administration services in its baseline configuration, usually addressed by Apply hardening guidance to disable unnecessary services and use encrypted authenticated management. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Lakeview Insurance was resolved. The specific required evidence is: Logs retain reliable timestamps and administrators can verify secure centralized delivery.

C:

Legacy community access fails and authorized encrypted monitoring succeeds. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: A switch exposes writable SNMP community strings and weak credentials to the production network, usually addressed by Replace insecure monitoring settings with SNMPv3 authentication and privacy plus ACL restrictions. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Lakeview Insurance was resolved. The specific required evidence is: Logs retain reliable timestamps and administrators can verify secure centralized delivery.

D:

A deliberately changed hardening setting is flagged with device, control, and owner. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: Security benchmarks are checked only once during installation and later drift goes unnoticed, usually addressed by Automate recurring compliance scans and review deviations through change management. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Lakeview Insurance was resolved. The specific required evidence is: Logs retain reliable timestamps and administrators can verify secure centralized delivery.

Question 387

A security engineer at Ridgeview Finance reviews financial reporting and customer services as part of an application modernization project. The observed problem is: An organization enables syslog but ignores local clock integrity and log retention in its network hardening profile. What is the BEST corrective action?

  1. Replace or disable defaults and enforce individual least-privilege management identities.
  2. Apply hardening guidance to disable unnecessary services and use encrypted authenticated management.
  3. Harden time synchronization, logging destinations, and log access with documented retention.
  4. Compare its release and configuration to supported CIS-style hardening and vendor advisories.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Harden time synchronization, logging destinations, and log access with documented retention. This directly addresses the documented failure: An organization enables syslog but ignores local clock integrity and log retention in its network hardening profile. For the Ridgeview Finance environment, the measurable success condition is: Logs retain reliable timestamps and administrators can verify secure centralized delivery. This control targets the specific failure rather than merely changing an unrelated security setting.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Replace or disable defaults and enforce individual least-privilege management identities. That action fits another problem: A security appliance retains vendor default accounts and shared passwords across multiple deployments. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Ridgeview Finance: An organization enables syslog but ignores local clock integrity and log retention in its network hardening profile. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Harden time synchronization, logging destinations, and log access with documented retention.

B:

Apply hardening guidance to disable unnecessary services and use encrypted authenticated management. That action fits another problem: A Cisco IOS XE router exposes legacy unauthenticated administration services in its baseline configuration. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Ridgeview Finance: An organization enables syslog but ignores local clock integrity and log retention in its network hardening profile. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Harden time synchronization, logging destinations, and log access with documented retention.

D:

Compare its release and configuration to supported CIS-style hardening and vendor advisories. That action fits another problem: A Cisco Secure Firewall deployment uses outdated software with published security fixes unassessed. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Ridgeview Finance: An organization enables syslog but ignores local clock integrity and log retention in its network hardening profile. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Harden time synchronization, logging destinations, and log access with documented retention.

Question 388

During an application modernization project at Ridgeview Finance, engineers say that they resolved this finding: An organization enables syslog but ignores local clock integrity and log retention in its network hardening profile. Which result provides the STRONGEST acceptance evidence?

  1. Logs retain reliable timestamps and administrators can verify secure centralized delivery.
  2. Patch and configuration evidence resolves the identified exposure without breaking expected traffic.
  3. Credential audits find no active default logins and every change is attributable.
  4. Configuration checks show obsolete services disabled and authorized SSH administration working.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Logs retain reliable timestamps and administrators can verify secure centralized delivery. This is the decisive evidence for the original problem: An organization enables syslog but ignores local clock integrity and log retention in its network hardening profile. It verifies that the intended corrective control—Harden time synchronization, logging destinations, and log access with documented retention—works in the relevant environment; a completed change ticket alone would not prove the outcome at Ridgeview Finance.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Patch and configuration evidence resolves the identified exposure without breaking expected traffic. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: A Cisco Secure Firewall deployment uses outdated software with published security fixes unassessed, usually addressed by Compare its release and configuration to supported CIS-style hardening and vendor advisories. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Ridgeview Finance was resolved. The specific required evidence is: Logs retain reliable timestamps and administrators can verify secure centralized delivery.

C:

Credential audits find no active default logins and every change is attributable. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: A security appliance retains vendor default accounts and shared passwords across multiple deployments, usually addressed by Replace or disable defaults and enforce individual least-privilege management identities. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Ridgeview Finance was resolved. The specific required evidence is: Logs retain reliable timestamps and administrators can verify secure centralized delivery.

D:

Configuration checks show obsolete services disabled and authorized SSH administration working. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: A Cisco IOS XE router exposes legacy unauthenticated administration services in its baseline configuration, usually addressed by Apply hardening guidance to disable unnecessary services and use encrypted authenticated management. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Ridgeview Finance was resolved. The specific required evidence is: Logs retain reliable timestamps and administrators can verify secure centralized delivery.

Question 389

At Brightstone Legal, during a security incident tabletop exercise, the security team is examining client matters and confidential documents. The finding is: Security benchmarks are checked only once during installation and later drift goes unnoticed. Which action BEST addresses this specific security issue?

  1. Replace or disable defaults and enforce individual least-privilege management identities.
  2. Replace insecure monitoring settings with SNMPv3 authentication and privacy plus ACL restrictions.
  3. Automate recurring compliance scans and review deviations through change management.
  4. Apply hardening guidance to disable unnecessary services and use encrypted authenticated management.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Automate recurring compliance scans and review deviations through change management. This directly addresses the documented failure: Security benchmarks are checked only once during installation and later drift goes unnoticed. For the Brightstone Legal environment, the measurable success condition is: A deliberately changed hardening setting is flagged with device, control, and owner. This control targets the specific failure rather than merely changing an unrelated security setting.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Replace or disable defaults and enforce individual least-privilege management identities. That action fits another problem: A security appliance retains vendor default accounts and shared passwords across multiple deployments. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Brightstone Legal: Security benchmarks are checked only once during installation and later drift goes unnoticed. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Automate recurring compliance scans and review deviations through change management.

B:

Replace insecure monitoring settings with SNMPv3 authentication and privacy plus ACL restrictions. That action fits another problem: A switch exposes writable SNMP community strings and weak credentials to the production network. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Brightstone Legal: Security benchmarks are checked only once during installation and later drift goes unnoticed. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Automate recurring compliance scans and review deviations through change management.

D:

Apply hardening guidance to disable unnecessary services and use encrypted authenticated management. That action fits another problem: A Cisco IOS XE router exposes legacy unauthenticated administration services in its baseline configuration. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Brightstone Legal: Security benchmarks are checked only once during installation and later drift goes unnoticed. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Automate recurring compliance scans and review deviations through change management.

Question 390

At Brightstone Legal, a team reports that it corrected the following problem affecting client matters and confidential documents: Security benchmarks are checked only once during installation and later drift goes unnoticed. Which observation BEST verifies that the correction actually worked?

  1. A deliberately changed hardening setting is flagged with device, control, and owner.
  2. Legacy community access fails and authorized encrypted monitoring succeeds.
  3. Credential audits find no active default logins and every change is attributable.
  4. Configuration checks show obsolete services disabled and authorized SSH administration working.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

A deliberately changed hardening setting is flagged with device, control, and owner. This is the decisive evidence for the original problem: Security benchmarks are checked only once during installation and later drift goes unnoticed. It verifies that the intended corrective control—Automate recurring compliance scans and review deviations through change management—works in the relevant environment; a completed change ticket alone would not prove the outcome at Brightstone Legal.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Legacy community access fails and authorized encrypted monitoring succeeds. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: A switch exposes writable SNMP community strings and weak credentials to the production network, usually addressed by Replace insecure monitoring settings with SNMPv3 authentication and privacy plus ACL restrictions. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Brightstone Legal was resolved. The specific required evidence is: A deliberately changed hardening setting is flagged with device, control, and owner.

C:

Credential audits find no active default logins and every change is attributable. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: A security appliance retains vendor default accounts and shared passwords across multiple deployments, usually addressed by Replace or disable defaults and enforce individual least-privilege management identities. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Brightstone Legal was resolved. The specific required evidence is: A deliberately changed hardening setting is flagged with device, control, and owner.

D:

Configuration checks show obsolete services disabled and authorized SSH administration working. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: A Cisco IOS XE router exposes legacy unauthenticated administration services in its baseline configuration, usually addressed by Apply hardening guidance to disable unnecessary services and use encrypted authenticated management. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Brightstone Legal was resolved. The specific required evidence is: A deliberately changed hardening setting is flagged with device, control, and owner.