Question 380
During a cross-team security policy review at Harbor Point Medical, engineers say that they resolved this finding: A network engineer copies a benchmark recommendation that would disable a required feature without review. Which result provides the STRONGEST acceptance evidence?
Explanation
Correct Answer
The benchmark review records justified exceptions and verified protection for retained services. This is the decisive evidence for the original problem: A network engineer copies a benchmark recommendation that would disable a required feature without review. It verifies that the intended corrective control—Apply hardening with documented applicability, exceptions, and compensating controls—works in the relevant environment; a completed change ticket alone would not prove the outcome at Harbor Point Medical.
Incorrect Answers
Configuration checks show obsolete services disabled and authorized SSH administration working. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: A Cisco IOS XE router exposes legacy unauthenticated administration services in its baseline configuration, usually addressed by Apply hardening guidance to disable unnecessary services and use encrypted authenticated management. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Harbor Point Medical was resolved. The specific required evidence is: The benchmark review records justified exceptions and verified protection for retained services.
A deliberately changed hardening setting is flagged with device, control, and owner. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: Security benchmarks are checked only once during installation and later drift goes unnoticed, usually addressed by Automate recurring compliance scans and review deviations through change management. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Harbor Point Medical was resolved. The specific required evidence is: The benchmark review records justified exceptions and verified protection for retained services.
Legacy community access fails and authorized encrypted monitoring succeeds. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: A switch exposes writable SNMP community strings and weak credentials to the production network, usually addressed by Replace insecure monitoring settings with SNMPv3 authentication and privacy plus ACL restrictions. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Harbor Point Medical was resolved. The specific required evidence is: The benchmark review records justified exceptions and verified protection for retained services.