McAfee-Secured Website

Exam Bundle

Exam Code: 350-701

Exam Name Implementing and Operating Cisco Security Core Technologies

Certification Provider: Cisco

Corresponding Certifications: CCIE Security , CCNP Security

Cisco 350-701 Bundle $44.99

100% Cisco 350-701 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real 350-701 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    350-701 Questions & Answers

    789 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual 350-701 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • 350-701 Video Course

    350-701 Video Course

    299 Video Lectures

    350-701 Video Course is developed by Cisco Professionals to help you pass the 350-701 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Implementing and Operating Cisco Security Core Technologies exam.
  • Study Guide

    350-701 Study Guide

    701 PDF Pages

    Developed by industry experts, this 701-page guide spells out in painstaking detail all of the information you need to ace 350-701 exam.

Implementing and Operating Cisco Security Core Technologies (350-701) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $194.97
Bundle Price: $149.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    789 Questions

    $124.99
  • 350-701 Video Course

    Video Course

    299 Video Lectures

    $39.99
  • Study Guide

    Study Guide

    701 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Cisco 350-701 Practice Test 41

Question 400

During a planned service expansion at Prairie Health Network, engineers say that they resolved this finding: A network device accepts local login but never reaches the configured TACACS+ server during administrator authentication. Which result provides the STRONGEST acceptance evidence?

  1. Authorized emergency access works during outage and produces an audit trail.
  2. An approved identity receives the correct VLAN or authorization profile.
  3. A test administrator authenticates through TACACS+ and the server logs the transaction.
  4. The corrected matching policy grants only the authorized access type.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

A test administrator authenticates through TACACS+ and the server logs the transaction. This is the decisive evidence for the original problem: A network device accepts local login but never reaches the configured TACACS+ server during administrator authentication. It verifies that the intended corrective control—Verify AAA server reachability, source interface, shared secret, and method-list order—works in the relevant environment; a completed change ticket alone would not prove the outcome at Prairie Health Network.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Authorized emergency access works during outage and produces an audit trail. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: A firewall times out to its AAA server and administrators become locked out without a documented recovery method, usually addressed by Configure a carefully restricted local break-glass fallback and test server failure behavior. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Prairie Health Network was resolved. The specific required evidence is: A test administrator authenticates through TACACS+ and the server logs the transaction.

B:

An approved identity receives the correct VLAN or authorization profile. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: RADIUS authentication succeeds but an access policy applies the wrong authorization attributes, usually addressed by Inspect the returned RADIUS attributes and the corresponding device policy mapping. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Prairie Health Network was resolved. The specific required evidence is: A test administrator authenticates through TACACS+ and the server logs the transaction.

D:

The corrected matching policy grants only the authorized access type. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: AAA debug logs show an unknown policy set and engineers incorrectly change user passwords, usually addressed by Correlate identity, network device group, service, and policy evaluation before changing credentials. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Prairie Health Network was resolved. The specific required evidence is: A test administrator authenticates through TACACS+ and the server logs the transaction.

Question 401

At Northshore Hospitality, during a privileged access assessment, the security team is examining reservation systems and staff endpoints. The finding is: RADIUS authentication succeeds but an access policy applies the wrong authorization attributes. Which action BEST addresses this specific security issue?

  1. Correlate identity, network device group, service, and policy evaluation before changing credentials.
  2. Synchronize the RADIUS shared secrets and review timeout and retry configuration.
  3. Inspect the returned RADIUS attributes and the corresponding device policy mapping.
  4. Verify AAA server reachability, source interface, shared secret, and method-list order.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Inspect the returned RADIUS attributes and the corresponding device policy mapping. This directly addresses the documented failure: RADIUS authentication succeeds but an access policy applies the wrong authorization attributes. For the Northshore Hospitality environment, the measurable success condition is: An approved identity receives the correct VLAN or authorization profile. This control targets the specific failure rather than merely changing an unrelated security setting.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Correlate identity, network device group, service, and policy evaluation before changing credentials. That action fits another problem: AAA debug logs show an unknown policy set and engineers incorrectly change user passwords. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Northshore Hospitality: RADIUS authentication succeeds but an access policy applies the wrong authorization attributes. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Inspect the returned RADIUS attributes and the corresponding device policy mapping.

B:

Synchronize the RADIUS shared secrets and review timeout and retry configuration. That action fits another problem: RADIUS sessions fail intermittently because client and server shared secrets do not match after rotation. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Northshore Hospitality: RADIUS authentication succeeds but an access policy applies the wrong authorization attributes. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Inspect the returned RADIUS attributes and the corresponding device policy mapping.

D:

Verify AAA server reachability, source interface, shared secret, and method-list order. That action fits another problem: A network device accepts local login but never reaches the configured TACACS+ server during administrator authentication. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Northshore Hospitality: RADIUS authentication succeeds but an access policy applies the wrong authorization attributes. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Inspect the returned RADIUS attributes and the corresponding device policy mapping.

Question 402

At Northshore Hospitality, a team reports that it corrected the following problem affecting reservation systems and staff endpoints: RADIUS authentication succeeds but an access policy applies the wrong authorization attributes. Which observation BEST verifies that the correction actually worked?

  1. An approved identity receives the correct VLAN or authorization profile.
  2. The corrected matching policy grants only the authorized access type.
  3. A test administrator authenticates through TACACS+ and the server logs the transaction.
  4. A repeated test set authenticates reliably with the current secret and records accounting.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

An approved identity receives the correct VLAN or authorization profile. This is the decisive evidence for the original problem: RADIUS authentication succeeds but an access policy applies the wrong authorization attributes. It verifies that the intended corrective control—Inspect the returned RADIUS attributes and the corresponding device policy mapping—works in the relevant environment; a completed change ticket alone would not prove the outcome at Northshore Hospitality.

Incorrect Answers

B:

The corrected matching policy grants only the authorized access type. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: AAA debug logs show an unknown policy set and engineers incorrectly change user passwords, usually addressed by Correlate identity, network device group, service, and policy evaluation before changing credentials. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Northshore Hospitality was resolved. The specific required evidence is: An approved identity receives the correct VLAN or authorization profile.

C:

A test administrator authenticates through TACACS+ and the server logs the transaction. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: A network device accepts local login but never reaches the configured TACACS+ server during administrator authentication, usually addressed by Verify AAA server reachability, source interface, shared secret, and method-list order. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Northshore Hospitality was resolved. The specific required evidence is: An approved identity receives the correct VLAN or authorization profile.

D:

A repeated test set authenticates reliably with the current secret and records accounting. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: RADIUS sessions fail intermittently because client and server shared secrets do not match after rotation, usually addressed by Synchronize the RADIUS shared secrets and review timeout and retry configuration. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Northshore Hospitality was resolved. The specific required evidence is: An approved identity receives the correct VLAN or authorization profile.

Question 403

A security engineer at Willowbrook Education reviews student collaboration platforms as part of a cross-team security policy review. The observed problem is: RADIUS authentication succeeds but an access policy applies the wrong authorization attributes. What is the BEST corrective action?

  1. Verify AAA server reachability, source interface, shared secret, and method-list order.
  2. Configure an appropriate source interface and allow the required AAA flow securely.
  3. Inspect the returned RADIUS attributes and the corresponding device policy mapping.
  4. Configure a carefully restricted local break-glass fallback and test server failure behavior.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Inspect the returned RADIUS attributes and the corresponding device policy mapping. This directly addresses the documented failure: RADIUS authentication succeeds but an access policy applies the wrong authorization attributes. For the Willowbrook Education environment, the measurable success condition is: An approved identity receives the correct VLAN or authorization profile. This control targets the specific failure rather than merely changing an unrelated security setting.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Verify AAA server reachability, source interface, shared secret, and method-list order. That action fits another problem: A network device accepts local login but never reaches the configured TACACS+ server during administrator authentication. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Willowbrook Education: RADIUS authentication succeeds but an access policy applies the wrong authorization attributes. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Inspect the returned RADIUS attributes and the corresponding device policy mapping.

B:

Configure an appropriate source interface and allow the required AAA flow securely. That action fits another problem: A network device sends TACACS+ requests from an interface not permitted through the management firewall. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Willowbrook Education: RADIUS authentication succeeds but an access policy applies the wrong authorization attributes. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Inspect the returned RADIUS attributes and the corresponding device policy mapping.

D:

Configure a carefully restricted local break-glass fallback and test server failure behavior. That action fits another problem: A firewall times out to its AAA server and administrators become locked out without a documented recovery method. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Willowbrook Education: RADIUS authentication succeeds but an access policy applies the wrong authorization attributes. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Inspect the returned RADIUS attributes and the corresponding device policy mapping.

Question 404

During a cross-team security policy review at Willowbrook Education, engineers say that they resolved this finding: RADIUS authentication succeeds but an access policy applies the wrong authorization attributes. Which result provides the STRONGEST acceptance evidence?

  1. An approved identity receives the correct VLAN or authorization profile.
  2. Requests reach the intended AAA server from the approved source address.
  3. Authorized emergency access works during outage and produces an audit trail.
  4. A test administrator authenticates through TACACS+ and the server logs the transaction.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

An approved identity receives the correct VLAN or authorization profile. This is the decisive evidence for the original problem: RADIUS authentication succeeds but an access policy applies the wrong authorization attributes. It verifies that the intended corrective control—Inspect the returned RADIUS attributes and the corresponding device policy mapping—works in the relevant environment; a completed change ticket alone would not prove the outcome at Willowbrook Education.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Requests reach the intended AAA server from the approved source address. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: A network device sends TACACS+ requests from an interface not permitted through the management firewall, usually addressed by Configure an appropriate source interface and allow the required AAA flow securely. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Willowbrook Education was resolved. The specific required evidence is: An approved identity receives the correct VLAN or authorization profile.

C:

Authorized emergency access works during outage and produces an audit trail. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: A firewall times out to its AAA server and administrators become locked out without a documented recovery method, usually addressed by Configure a carefully restricted local break-glass fallback and test server failure behavior. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Willowbrook Education was resolved. The specific required evidence is: An approved identity receives the correct VLAN or authorization profile.

D:

A test administrator authenticates through TACACS+ and the server logs the transaction. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: A network device accepts local login but never reaches the configured TACACS+ server during administrator authentication, usually addressed by Verify AAA server reachability, source interface, shared secret, and method-list order. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Willowbrook Education was resolved. The specific required evidence is: An approved identity receives the correct VLAN or authorization profile.

Question 405

At Silverline Labs, during an application modernization project, the security team is examining product testing and research networks. The finding is: A firewall times out to its AAA server and administrators become locked out without a documented recovery method. Which action BEST addresses this specific security issue?

  1. Correlate identity, network device group, service, and policy evaluation before changing credentials.
  2. Configure a carefully restricted local break-glass fallback and test server failure behavior.
  3. Verify AAA server reachability, source interface, shared secret, and method-list order.
  4. Inspect the returned RADIUS attributes and the corresponding device policy mapping.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Configure a carefully restricted local break-glass fallback and test server failure behavior. This directly addresses the documented failure: A firewall times out to its AAA server and administrators become locked out without a documented recovery method. For the Silverline Labs environment, the measurable success condition is: Authorized emergency access works during outage and produces an audit trail. This control targets the specific failure rather than merely changing an unrelated security setting.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Correlate identity, network device group, service, and policy evaluation before changing credentials. That action fits another problem: AAA debug logs show an unknown policy set and engineers incorrectly change user passwords. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Silverline Labs: A firewall times out to its AAA server and administrators become locked out without a documented recovery method. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Configure a carefully restricted local break-glass fallback and test server failure behavior.

C:

Verify AAA server reachability, source interface, shared secret, and method-list order. That action fits another problem: A network device accepts local login but never reaches the configured TACACS+ server during administrator authentication. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Silverline Labs: A firewall times out to its AAA server and administrators become locked out without a documented recovery method. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Configure a carefully restricted local break-glass fallback and test server failure behavior.

D:

Inspect the returned RADIUS attributes and the corresponding device policy mapping. That action fits another problem: RADIUS authentication succeeds but an access policy applies the wrong authorization attributes. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Silverline Labs: A firewall times out to its AAA server and administrators become locked out without a documented recovery method. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Configure a carefully restricted local break-glass fallback and test server failure behavior.

Question 406

At Silverline Labs, a team reports that it corrected the following problem affecting product testing and research networks: A firewall times out to its AAA server and administrators become locked out without a documented recovery method. Which observation BEST verifies that the correction actually worked?

  1. A test administrator authenticates through TACACS+ and the server logs the transaction.
  2. Authorized emergency access works during outage and produces an audit trail.
  3. An approved identity receives the correct VLAN or authorization profile.
  4. The corrected matching policy grants only the authorized access type.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Authorized emergency access works during outage and produces an audit trail. This is the decisive evidence for the original problem: A firewall times out to its AAA server and administrators become locked out without a documented recovery method. It verifies that the intended corrective control—Configure a carefully restricted local break-glass fallback and test server failure behavior—works in the relevant environment; a completed change ticket alone would not prove the outcome at Silverline Labs.

Incorrect Answers

A:

A test administrator authenticates through TACACS+ and the server logs the transaction. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: A network device accepts local login but never reaches the configured TACACS+ server during administrator authentication, usually addressed by Verify AAA server reachability, source interface, shared secret, and method-list order. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Silverline Labs was resolved. The specific required evidence is: Authorized emergency access works during outage and produces an audit trail.

C:

An approved identity receives the correct VLAN or authorization profile. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: RADIUS authentication succeeds but an access policy applies the wrong authorization attributes, usually addressed by Inspect the returned RADIUS attributes and the corresponding device policy mapping. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Silverline Labs was resolved. The specific required evidence is: Authorized emergency access works during outage and produces an audit trail.

D:

The corrected matching policy grants only the authorized access type. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: AAA debug logs show an unknown policy set and engineers incorrectly change user passwords, usually addressed by Correlate identity, network device group, service, and policy evaluation before changing credentials. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Silverline Labs was resolved. The specific required evidence is: Authorized emergency access works during outage and produces an audit trail.

Question 407

A security engineer at Westlake Retail reviews retail inventory and order processing as part of a privileged access assessment. The observed problem is: A firewall times out to its AAA server and administrators become locked out without a documented recovery method. What is the BEST corrective action?

  1. Configure a carefully restricted local break-glass fallback and test server failure behavior.
  2. Configure an appropriate source interface and allow the required AAA flow securely.
  3. Differentiate authentication failure from TACACS+ command authorization or accounting policy problems.
  4. Inspect the returned RADIUS attributes and the corresponding device policy mapping.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Configure a carefully restricted local break-glass fallback and test server failure behavior. This directly addresses the documented failure: A firewall times out to its AAA server and administrators become locked out without a documented recovery method. For the Westlake Retail environment, the measurable success condition is: Authorized emergency access works during outage and produces an audit trail. This control targets the specific failure rather than merely changing an unrelated security setting.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Configure an appropriate source interface and allow the required AAA flow securely. That action fits another problem: A network device sends TACACS+ requests from an interface not permitted through the management firewall. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Westlake Retail: A firewall times out to its AAA server and administrators become locked out without a documented recovery method. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Configure a carefully restricted local break-glass fallback and test server failure behavior.

C:

Differentiate authentication failure from TACACS+ command authorization or accounting policy problems. That action fits another problem: A user is repeatedly rejected for device administration despite successful directory authentication. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Westlake Retail: A firewall times out to its AAA server and administrators become locked out without a documented recovery method. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Configure a carefully restricted local break-glass fallback and test server failure behavior.

D:

Inspect the returned RADIUS attributes and the corresponding device policy mapping. That action fits another problem: RADIUS authentication succeeds but an access policy applies the wrong authorization attributes. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Westlake Retail: A firewall times out to its AAA server and administrators become locked out without a documented recovery method. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Configure a carefully restricted local break-glass fallback and test server failure behavior.

Question 408

During a privileged access assessment at Westlake Retail, engineers say that they resolved this finding: A firewall times out to its AAA server and administrators become locked out without a documented recovery method. Which result provides the STRONGEST acceptance evidence?

  1. An approved identity receives the correct VLAN or authorization profile.
  2. Logs identify the policy denial and allowed commands work for the approved role.
  3. Requests reach the intended AAA server from the approved source address.
  4. Authorized emergency access works during outage and produces an audit trail.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Authorized emergency access works during outage and produces an audit trail. This is the decisive evidence for the original problem: A firewall times out to its AAA server and administrators become locked out without a documented recovery method. It verifies that the intended corrective control—Configure a carefully restricted local break-glass fallback and test server failure behavior—works in the relevant environment; a completed change ticket alone would not prove the outcome at Westlake Retail.

Incorrect Answers

A:

An approved identity receives the correct VLAN or authorization profile. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: RADIUS authentication succeeds but an access policy applies the wrong authorization attributes, usually addressed by Inspect the returned RADIUS attributes and the corresponding device policy mapping. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Westlake Retail was resolved. The specific required evidence is: Authorized emergency access works during outage and produces an audit trail.

B:

Logs identify the policy denial and allowed commands work for the approved role. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: A user is repeatedly rejected for device administration despite successful directory authentication, usually addressed by Differentiate authentication failure from TACACS+ command authorization or accounting policy problems. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Westlake Retail was resolved. The specific required evidence is: Authorized emergency access works during outage and produces an audit trail.

C:

Requests reach the intended AAA server from the approved source address. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: A network device sends TACACS+ requests from an interface not permitted through the management firewall, usually addressed by Configure an appropriate source interface and allow the required AAA flow securely. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Westlake Retail was resolved. The specific required evidence is: Authorized emergency access works during outage and produces an audit trail.

Question 409

At Elmwood Manufacturing, during a scheduled security controls review, the security team is examining industrial analytics and business systems. The finding is: A network device sends TACACS+ requests from an interface not permitted through the management firewall. Which action BEST addresses this specific security issue?

  1. Configure a carefully restricted local break-glass fallback and test server failure behavior.
  2. Configure an appropriate source interface and allow the required AAA flow securely.
  3. Inspect the returned RADIUS attributes and the corresponding device policy mapping.
  4. Verify AAA server reachability, source interface, shared secret, and method-list order.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Configure an appropriate source interface and allow the required AAA flow securely. This directly addresses the documented failure: A network device sends TACACS+ requests from an interface not permitted through the management firewall. For the Elmwood Manufacturing environment, the measurable success condition is: Requests reach the intended AAA server from the approved source address. This control targets the specific failure rather than merely changing an unrelated security setting.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Configure a carefully restricted local break-glass fallback and test server failure behavior. That action fits another problem: A firewall times out to its AAA server and administrators become locked out without a documented recovery method. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Elmwood Manufacturing: A network device sends TACACS+ requests from an interface not permitted through the management firewall. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Configure an appropriate source interface and allow the required AAA flow securely.

C:

Inspect the returned RADIUS attributes and the corresponding device policy mapping. That action fits another problem: RADIUS authentication succeeds but an access policy applies the wrong authorization attributes. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Elmwood Manufacturing: A network device sends TACACS+ requests from an interface not permitted through the management firewall. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Configure an appropriate source interface and allow the required AAA flow securely.

D:

Verify AAA server reachability, source interface, shared secret, and method-list order. That action fits another problem: A network device accepts local login but never reaches the configured TACACS+ server during administrator authentication. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Elmwood Manufacturing: A network device sends TACACS+ requests from an interface not permitted through the management firewall. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Configure an appropriate source interface and allow the required AAA flow securely.

Question 410

At Elmwood Manufacturing, a team reports that it corrected the following problem affecting industrial analytics and business systems: A network device sends TACACS+ requests from an interface not permitted through the management firewall. Which observation BEST verifies that the correction actually worked?

  1. An approved identity receives the correct VLAN or authorization profile.
  2. Requests reach the intended AAA server from the approved source address.
  3. Authorized emergency access works during outage and produces an audit trail.
  4. A test administrator authenticates through TACACS+ and the server logs the transaction.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Requests reach the intended AAA server from the approved source address. This is the decisive evidence for the original problem: A network device sends TACACS+ requests from an interface not permitted through the management firewall. It verifies that the intended corrective control—Configure an appropriate source interface and allow the required AAA flow securely—works in the relevant environment; a completed change ticket alone would not prove the outcome at Elmwood Manufacturing.

Incorrect Answers

A:

An approved identity receives the correct VLAN or authorization profile. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: RADIUS authentication succeeds but an access policy applies the wrong authorization attributes, usually addressed by Inspect the returned RADIUS attributes and the corresponding device policy mapping. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Elmwood Manufacturing was resolved. The specific required evidence is: Requests reach the intended AAA server from the approved source address.

C:

Authorized emergency access works during outage and produces an audit trail. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: A firewall times out to its AAA server and administrators become locked out without a documented recovery method, usually addressed by Configure a carefully restricted local break-glass fallback and test server failure behavior. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Elmwood Manufacturing was resolved. The specific required evidence is: Requests reach the intended AAA server from the approved source address.

D:

A test administrator authenticates through TACACS+ and the server logs the transaction. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: A network device accepts local login but never reaches the configured TACACS+ server during administrator authentication, usually addressed by Verify AAA server reachability, source interface, shared secret, and method-list order. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Elmwood Manufacturing was resolved. The specific required evidence is: Requests reach the intended AAA server from the approved source address.