Question 490
An administrator needs to move a member from ElasticXL Site 1 into Site 2. It already appears as a managed member of Site 1, so it is not pending for enrollment in the second site. A preliminary suggestion is to do not add or remove an unassigned Sync-bond interface casually. The incident evidence instead points to a different control within the same R82 subsystem. What is the most relevant action?
Explanation
Correct Answer
The documented workflow removes and re-adds a node to the chosen site. This directly addresses the documented incident evidence.
Incorrect Answers
Changing unassigned Sync bond members can reset required flags, but the current evidence calls for a different R82 operation.
A new site is used to establish High Availability sites; this does not resolve the observed condition.
Adding to the existing site enables supported load sharing, yet that applies to increase capacity inside an existing ElasticXL Site rather than the observed issue.