McAfee-Secured Website

Exam Bundle

Exam Code: 010-160

Exam Name Linux Essentials Certificate Exam, version 1.6

Certification Provider: LPI

Corresponding Certification: Linux Essentials

LPI 010-160 Bundle $44.99
010-160 Sample 1 010-160 Sample 2 010-160 Sample 3 010-160 Sample 4 010-160 Sample 5 010-160 Sample 6 010-160 Sample 7 010-160 Sample 8 010-160 Sample 9 010-160 Sample 10

100% LPI 010-160 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real 010-160 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    010-160 Questions & Answers

    80 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual 010-160 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • 010-160 Video Course

    010-160 Video Course

    78 Video Lectures

    010-160 Video Course is developed by LPI Professionals to help you pass the 010-160 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Linux Essentials Certificate Exam, version 1.6 exam.
  • Study Guide

    010-160 Study Guide

    364 PDF Pages

    Developed by industry experts, this 364-page guide spells out in painstaking detail all of the information you need to ace 010-160 exam.

Linux Essentials Certificate Exam, version 1.6 (010-160) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $194.97
Bundle Price: $149.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    80 Questions

    $124.99
  • 010-160 Video Course

    Video Course

    78 Video Lectures

    $39.99
  • Study Guide

    Study Guide

    364 PDF Pages

    $29.99

LPI 010-160 Practice Test 57

Question 560

A script owned by a user is readable but not executable by that owner. One student proposes Run chmod u+x deploy.sh and another proposes Run chmod 755 tools/. Which technical comparison is the soundest?

  1. Run chmod 755 tools/ is more directly suited to make owner script executable than Run chmod u+x deploy.sh, regardless of the stated constraint.
  2. The two actions are interchangeable for make owner script executable and necessarily have the same main result.
  3. Run chmod u+x deploy.sh is used because The symbolic u+x form adds execute permission for the owning user. The alternative Run chmod 755 tools/ addresses executable public directory mode instead.
  4. Run sudo chown alice notes.txt is the only useful action for make owner script executable; Run chmod u+x deploy.sh has no relevant effect.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Correct distinction: Run chmod u+x deploy.sh targets make owner script executable; The symbolic u+x form adds execute permission for the owning user. The compared alternative instead serves executable public directory mode.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Incorrect mapping: Run chmod 755 tools/ is used for executable public directory mode. It does not displace Run chmod u+x deploy.sh for the described requirement.

B:

The mechanisms are different: The symbolic u+x form adds execute permission for the owning user. By contrast, Mode 755 grants owner rwx and group/others r-x, allowing traversal but not modification by others. They are not universally interchangeable.

D:

The third option addresses change file owner: chown changes the ownership UID associated with the file. The original action remains relevant because The symbolic u+x form adds execute permission for the owning user.

Question 561

A private team file should allow owner read/write, group read, and no other access. Which action most directly addresses this requirement on a Linux-related system?

  1. Run chmod 640 report.txt
  2. Run chmod 755 tools/
  3. Run sudo chown alice notes.txt
  4. Run sudo chgrp editors notes.txt

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Correct for restrict confidential file mode: Mode 640 grants rw- to owner, r-- to group and --- to others.

Incorrect Answers

B:

This action targets executable public directory mode: Mode 755 grants owner rwx and group/others r-x, allowing traversal but not modification by others. The stated task instead calls for restrict confidential file mode.

C:

This action targets change file owner: chown changes the ownership UID associated with the file. The stated task instead calls for restrict confidential file mode.

D:

This action targets change owning group: chgrp changes group ownership without changing the file's owning user. The stated task instead calls for restrict confidential file mode.

Question 562

An operator follows this instruction: Run chmod 640 report.txt. For the task described as "restrict confidential file mode", what is the most accurate expected result?

  1. Mode 755 grants owner rwx and group/others r-x, allowing traversal but not modification by others.
  2. Mode 640 grants rw- to owner, r-- to group and --- to others.
  3. chown changes the ownership UID associated with the file.
  4. chgrp changes group ownership without changing the file's owning user.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Correct consequence of Run chmod 640 report.txt. This outcome explains its use for restrict confidential file mode.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This outcome belongs to executable public directory mode and would follow Run chmod 755 tools/; it is not the principal result of Run chmod 640 report.txt.

C:

This outcome belongs to change file owner and would follow Run sudo chown alice notes.txt; it is not the principal result of Run chmod 640 report.txt.

D:

This outcome belongs to change owning group and would follow Run sudo chgrp editors notes.txt; it is not the principal result of Run chmod 640 report.txt.

Question 563

A private team file should allow owner read/write, group read, and no other access. A teammate tries this different approach instead: Run chmod 755 tools/. The requirement is still unmet. Which corrective action should replace the misapplied approach?

  1. Run chmod 755 tools/
  2. Run sudo chown alice notes.txt
  3. Run chmod 640 report.txt
  4. Run sudo chgrp editors notes.txt

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Replace the attempt with this step: Mode 640 grants rw- to owner, r-- to group and --- to others. It fits restrict confidential file mode.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This step is specific to executable public directory mode: Mode 755 grants owner rwx and group/others r-x, allowing traversal but not modification by others. It does not fix the stated requirement for restrict confidential file mode.

B:

This step is specific to change file owner: chown changes the ownership UID associated with the file. It does not fix the stated requirement for restrict confidential file mode.

D:

This step is specific to change owning group: chgrp changes group ownership without changing the file's owning user. It does not fix the stated requirement for restrict confidential file mode.

Question 564

A private team file should allow owner read/write, group read, and no other access. One student proposes Run chmod 640 report.txt and another proposes Run sudo chown alice notes.txt. Which technical comparison is the soundest?

  1. Run sudo chown alice notes.txt is more directly suited to restrict confidential file mode than Run chmod 640 report.txt, regardless of the stated constraint.
  2. The two actions are interchangeable for restrict confidential file mode and necessarily have the same main result.
  3. Run sudo chgrp editors notes.txt is the only useful action for restrict confidential file mode; Run chmod 640 report.txt has no relevant effect.
  4. Run chmod 640 report.txt is used because Mode 640 grants rw- to owner, r-- to group and --- to others. The alternative Run sudo chown alice notes.txt addresses change file owner instead.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Correct distinction: Run chmod 640 report.txt targets restrict confidential file mode; Mode 640 grants rw- to owner, r-- to group and --- to others. The compared alternative instead serves change file owner.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Incorrect mapping: Run sudo chown alice notes.txt is used for change file owner. It does not displace Run chmod 640 report.txt for the described requirement.

B:

The mechanisms are different: Mode 640 grants rw- to owner, r-- to group and --- to others. By contrast, chown changes the ownership UID associated with the file. They are not universally interchangeable.

C:

The third option addresses change owning group: chgrp changes group ownership without changing the file's owning user. The original action remains relevant because Mode 640 grants rw- to owner, r-- to group and --- to others.

Question 565

A shared read-only program directory needs owner write and traversal/read access for group and others. Which action most directly addresses this requirement on a Linux-related system?

  1. Run sudo chown alice notes.txt
  2. Run chmod 755 tools/
  3. Run sudo chgrp editors notes.txt
  4. Grant appropriate execute permission on the directory after authorization

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Correct for executable public directory mode: Mode 755 grants owner rwx and group/others r-x, allowing traversal but not modification by others.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This action targets change file owner: chown changes the ownership UID associated with the file. The stated task instead calls for executable public directory mode.

C:

This action targets change owning group: chgrp changes group ownership without changing the file's owning user. The stated task instead calls for executable public directory mode.

D:

This action targets directory traverse permission: Directory execute permission permits path traversal or searching entries by name. The stated task instead calls for executable public directory mode.

Question 566

An operator follows this instruction: Run chmod 755 tools/. For the task described as "executable public directory mode", what is the most accurate expected result?

  1. chown changes the ownership UID associated with the file.
  2. chgrp changes group ownership without changing the file's owning user.
  3. Mode 755 grants owner rwx and group/others r-x, allowing traversal but not modification by others.
  4. Directory execute permission permits path traversal or searching entries by name.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Correct consequence of Run chmod 755 tools/. This outcome explains its use for executable public directory mode.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This outcome belongs to change file owner and would follow Run sudo chown alice notes.txt; it is not the principal result of Run chmod 755 tools/.

B:

This outcome belongs to change owning group and would follow Run sudo chgrp editors notes.txt; it is not the principal result of Run chmod 755 tools/.

D:

This outcome belongs to directory traverse permission and would follow Grant appropriate execute permission on the directory after authorization; it is not the principal result of Run chmod 755 tools/.

Question 567

A shared read-only program directory needs owner write and traversal/read access for group and others. A teammate tries this different approach instead: Run sudo chown alice notes.txt. The requirement is still unmet. Which corrective action should replace the misapplied approach?

  1. Run sudo chown alice notes.txt
  2. Run sudo chgrp editors notes.txt
  3. Grant appropriate execute permission on the directory after authorization
  4. Run chmod 755 tools/

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Replace the attempt with this step: Mode 755 grants owner rwx and group/others r-x, allowing traversal but not modification by others. It fits executable public directory mode.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This step is specific to change file owner: chown changes the ownership UID associated with the file. It does not fix the stated requirement for executable public directory mode.

B:

This step is specific to change owning group: chgrp changes group ownership without changing the file's owning user. It does not fix the stated requirement for executable public directory mode.

C:

This step is specific to directory traverse permission: Directory execute permission permits path traversal or searching entries by name. It does not fix the stated requirement for executable public directory mode.

Question 568

A shared read-only program directory needs owner write and traversal/read access for group and others. One student proposes Run chmod 755 tools/ and another proposes Run sudo chgrp editors notes.txt. Which technical comparison is the soundest?

  1. Run chmod 755 tools/ is used because Mode 755 grants owner rwx and group/others r-x, allowing traversal but not modification by others. The alternative Run sudo chgrp editors notes.txt addresses change owning group instead.
  2. Run sudo chgrp editors notes.txt is more directly suited to executable public directory mode than Run chmod 755 tools/, regardless of the stated constraint.
  3. The two actions are interchangeable for executable public directory mode and necessarily have the same main result.
  4. Grant appropriate execute permission on the directory after authorization is the only useful action for executable public directory mode; Run chmod 755 tools/ has no relevant effect.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Correct distinction: Run chmod 755 tools/ targets executable public directory mode; Mode 755 grants owner rwx and group/others r-x, allowing traversal but not modification by others. The compared alternative instead serves change owning group.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Incorrect mapping: Run sudo chgrp editors notes.txt is used for change owning group. It does not displace Run chmod 755 tools/ for the described requirement.

C:

The mechanisms are different: Mode 755 grants owner rwx and group/others r-x, allowing traversal but not modification by others. By contrast, chgrp changes group ownership without changing the file's owning user. They are not universally interchangeable.

D:

The third option addresses directory traverse permission: Directory execute permission permits path traversal or searching entries by name. The original action remains relevant because Mode 755 grants owner rwx and group/others r-x, allowing traversal but not modification by others.

Question 569

An administrator must transfer file ownership of notes.txt to user alice rather than changing permissions only. Which action most directly addresses this requirement on a Linux-related system?

  1. Run sudo chgrp editors notes.txt
  2. Grant appropriate execute permission on the directory after authorization
  3. Run sudo chown alice notes.txt
  4. Set umask 027 in the shell session

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Correct for change file owner: chown changes the ownership UID associated with the file.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This action targets change owning group: chgrp changes group ownership without changing the file's owning user. The stated task instead calls for change file owner.

B:

This action targets directory traverse permission: Directory execute permission permits path traversal or searching entries by name. The stated task instead calls for change file owner.

D:

This action targets restrict default creation mask: A 027 mask removes group write and all other permissions from newly created file/directory modes. The stated task instead calls for change file owner.

Question 570

An operator follows this instruction: Run sudo chown alice notes.txt. For the task described as "change file owner", what is the most accurate expected result?

  1. chgrp changes group ownership without changing the file's owning user.
  2. Directory execute permission permits path traversal or searching entries by name.
  3. A 027 mask removes group write and all other permissions from newly created file/directory modes.
  4. chown changes the ownership UID associated with the file.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Correct consequence of Run sudo chown alice notes.txt. This outcome explains its use for change file owner.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This outcome belongs to change owning group and would follow Run sudo chgrp editors notes.txt; it is not the principal result of Run sudo chown alice notes.txt.

B:

This outcome belongs to directory traverse permission and would follow Grant appropriate execute permission on the directory after authorization; it is not the principal result of Run sudo chown alice notes.txt.

C:

This outcome belongs to restrict default creation mask and would follow Set umask 027 in the shell session; it is not the principal result of Run sudo chown alice notes.txt.