McAfee-Secured Website

Exam Bundle

Exam Code: 010-160

Exam Name Linux Essentials Certificate Exam, version 1.6

Certification Provider: LPI

Corresponding Certification: Linux Essentials

LPI 010-160 Bundle $44.99
010-160 Sample 1 010-160 Sample 2 010-160 Sample 3 010-160 Sample 4 010-160 Sample 5 010-160 Sample 6 010-160 Sample 7 010-160 Sample 8 010-160 Sample 9 010-160 Sample 10

100% LPI 010-160 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real 010-160 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    010-160 Questions & Answers

    80 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual 010-160 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • 010-160 Video Course

    010-160 Video Course

    78 Video Lectures

    010-160 Video Course is developed by LPI Professionals to help you pass the 010-160 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Linux Essentials Certificate Exam, version 1.6 exam.
  • Study Guide

    010-160 Study Guide

    364 PDF Pages

    Developed by industry experts, this 364-page guide spells out in painstaking detail all of the information you need to ace 010-160 exam.

Linux Essentials Certificate Exam, version 1.6 (010-160) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $194.97
Bundle Price: $149.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    80 Questions

    $124.99
  • 010-160 Video Course

    Video Course

    78 Video Lectures

    $39.99
  • Study Guide

    Study Guide

    364 PDF Pages

    $29.99

LPI 010-160 Practice Test 56

Question 550

An operator follows this instruction: Place the template in /etc/skel/ before creating new homes. For the task described as "default home-directory templates", what is the most accurate expected result?

  1. useradd creates a new local user database entry according to system defaults and supplied options.
  2. passwd changes the account's local authentication password using the configured PAM policy.
  3. User-account creation tools commonly copy the skeleton directory into newly created home directories.
  4. groupadd creates a named group in the local group database.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Correct consequence of Place the template in /etc/skel/ before creating new homes. This outcome explains its use for default home-directory templates.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This outcome belongs to create local user account and would follow Run sudo useradd trainee with needed account options; it is not the principal result of Place the template in /etc/skel/ before creating new homes.

B:

This outcome belongs to set user authentication password and would follow Run sudo passwd trainee and set the password interactively; it is not the principal result of Place the template in /etc/skel/ before creating new homes.

D:

This outcome belongs to create new group and would follow Run sudo groupadd editors; it is not the principal result of Place the template in /etc/skel/ before creating new homes.

Question 551

An administrator wants new user home directories to inherit a common starter file at account creation. A teammate tries this different approach instead: Run sudo useradd trainee with needed account options. The requirement is still unmet. Which corrective action should replace the misapplied approach?

  1. Run sudo useradd trainee with needed account options
  2. Run sudo passwd trainee and set the password interactively
  3. Run sudo groupadd editors
  4. Place the template in /etc/skel/ before creating new homes

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Replace the attempt with this step: User-account creation tools commonly copy the skeleton directory into newly created home directories. It fits default home-directory templates.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This step is specific to create local user account: useradd creates a new local user database entry according to system defaults and supplied options. It does not fix the stated requirement for default home-directory templates.

B:

This step is specific to set user authentication password: passwd changes the account's local authentication password using the configured PAM policy. It does not fix the stated requirement for default home-directory templates.

C:

This step is specific to create new group: groupadd creates a named group in the local group database. It does not fix the stated requirement for default home-directory templates.

Question 552

An administrator wants new user home directories to inherit a common starter file at account creation. One student proposes Place the template in /etc/skel/ before creating new homes and another proposes Run sudo passwd trainee and set the password interactively. Which technical comparison is the soundest?

  1. Place the template in /etc/skel/ before creating new homes is used because User-account creation tools commonly copy the skeleton directory into newly created home directories. The alternative Run sudo passwd trainee and set the password interactively addresses set user authentication password instead.
  2. Run sudo passwd trainee and set the password interactively is more directly suited to default home-directory templates than Place the template in /etc/skel/ before creating new homes, regardless of the stated constraint.
  3. The two actions are interchangeable for default home-directory templates and necessarily have the same main result.
  4. Run sudo groupadd editors is the only useful action for default home-directory templates; Place the template in /etc/skel/ before creating new homes has no relevant effect.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Correct distinction: Place the template in /etc/skel/ before creating new homes targets default home-directory templates; User-account creation tools commonly copy the skeleton directory into newly created home directories. The compared alternative instead serves set user authentication password.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Incorrect mapping: Run sudo passwd trainee and set the password interactively is used for set user authentication password. It does not displace Place the template in /etc/skel/ before creating new homes for the described requirement.

C:

The mechanisms are different: User-account creation tools commonly copy the skeleton directory into newly created home directories. By contrast, passwd changes the account's local authentication password using the configured PAM policy. They are not universally interchangeable.

D:

The third option addresses create new group: groupadd creates a named group in the local group database. The original action remains relevant because User-account creation tools commonly copy the skeleton directory into newly created home directories.

Question 553

A technician needs to read a file's permission string and current owner/group before making changes. Which action most directly addresses this requirement on a Linux-related system?

  1. Run chmod u+x deploy.sh
  2. Run chmod 640 report.txt
  3. Run ls -l target.txt
  4. Run chmod 755 tools/

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Correct for inspect rwx permission bits: The long listing displays the rwx mode string and owner/group columns.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This action targets make owner script executable: The symbolic u+x form adds execute permission for the owning user. The stated task instead calls for inspect rwx permission bits.

B:

This action targets restrict confidential file mode: Mode 640 grants rw- to owner, r-- to group and --- to others. The stated task instead calls for inspect rwx permission bits.

D:

This action targets executable public directory mode: Mode 755 grants owner rwx and group/others r-x, allowing traversal but not modification by others. The stated task instead calls for inspect rwx permission bits.

Question 554

An operator follows this instruction: Run ls -l target.txt. For the task described as "inspect rwx permission bits", what is the most accurate expected result?

  1. The symbolic u+x form adds execute permission for the owning user.
  2. Mode 640 grants rw- to owner, r-- to group and --- to others.
  3. Mode 755 grants owner rwx and group/others r-x, allowing traversal but not modification by others.
  4. The long listing displays the rwx mode string and owner/group columns.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Correct consequence of Run ls -l target.txt. This outcome explains its use for inspect rwx permission bits.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This outcome belongs to make owner script executable and would follow Run chmod u+x deploy.sh; it is not the principal result of Run ls -l target.txt.

B:

This outcome belongs to restrict confidential file mode and would follow Run chmod 640 report.txt; it is not the principal result of Run ls -l target.txt.

C:

This outcome belongs to executable public directory mode and would follow Run chmod 755 tools/; it is not the principal result of Run ls -l target.txt.

Question 555

A technician needs to read a file's permission string and current owner/group before making changes. A teammate tries this different approach instead: Run chmod u+x deploy.sh. The requirement is still unmet. Which corrective action should replace the misapplied approach?

  1. Run ls -l target.txt
  2. Run chmod u+x deploy.sh
  3. Run chmod 640 report.txt
  4. Run chmod 755 tools/

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Replace the attempt with this step: The long listing displays the rwx mode string and owner/group columns. It fits inspect rwx permission bits.

Incorrect Answers

B:

This step is specific to make owner script executable: The symbolic u+x form adds execute permission for the owning user. It does not fix the stated requirement for inspect rwx permission bits.

C:

This step is specific to restrict confidential file mode: Mode 640 grants rw- to owner, r-- to group and --- to others. It does not fix the stated requirement for inspect rwx permission bits.

D:

This step is specific to executable public directory mode: Mode 755 grants owner rwx and group/others r-x, allowing traversal but not modification by others. It does not fix the stated requirement for inspect rwx permission bits.

Question 556

A technician needs to read a file's permission string and current owner/group before making changes. One student proposes Run ls -l target.txt and another proposes Run chmod 640 report.txt. Which technical comparison is the soundest?

  1. Run chmod 640 report.txt is more directly suited to inspect rwx permission bits than Run ls -l target.txt, regardless of the stated constraint.
  2. Run ls -l target.txt is used because The long listing displays the rwx mode string and owner/group columns. The alternative Run chmod 640 report.txt addresses restrict confidential file mode instead.
  3. The two actions are interchangeable for inspect rwx permission bits and necessarily have the same main result.
  4. Run chmod 755 tools/ is the only useful action for inspect rwx permission bits; Run ls -l target.txt has no relevant effect.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Correct distinction: Run ls -l target.txt targets inspect rwx permission bits; The long listing displays the rwx mode string and owner/group columns. The compared alternative instead serves restrict confidential file mode.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Incorrect mapping: Run chmod 640 report.txt is used for restrict confidential file mode. It does not displace Run ls -l target.txt for the described requirement.

C:

The mechanisms are different: The long listing displays the rwx mode string and owner/group columns. By contrast, Mode 640 grants rw- to owner, r-- to group and --- to others. They are not universally interchangeable.

D:

The third option addresses executable public directory mode: Mode 755 grants owner rwx and group/others r-x, allowing traversal but not modification by others. The original action remains relevant because The long listing displays the rwx mode string and owner/group columns.

Question 557

A script owned by a user is readable but not executable by that owner. Which action most directly addresses this requirement on a Linux-related system?

  1. Run chmod 640 report.txt
  2. Run chmod 755 tools/
  3. Run sudo chown alice notes.txt
  4. Run chmod u+x deploy.sh

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Correct for make owner script executable: The symbolic u+x form adds execute permission for the owning user.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This action targets restrict confidential file mode: Mode 640 grants rw- to owner, r-- to group and --- to others. The stated task instead calls for make owner script executable.

B:

This action targets executable public directory mode: Mode 755 grants owner rwx and group/others r-x, allowing traversal but not modification by others. The stated task instead calls for make owner script executable.

C:

This action targets change file owner: chown changes the ownership UID associated with the file. The stated task instead calls for make owner script executable.

Question 558

An operator follows this instruction: Run chmod u+x deploy.sh. For the task described as "make owner script executable", what is the most accurate expected result?

  1. The symbolic u+x form adds execute permission for the owning user.
  2. Mode 640 grants rw- to owner, r-- to group and --- to others.
  3. Mode 755 grants owner rwx and group/others r-x, allowing traversal but not modification by others.
  4. chown changes the ownership UID associated with the file.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Correct consequence of Run chmod u+x deploy.sh. This outcome explains its use for make owner script executable.

Incorrect Answers

B:

This outcome belongs to restrict confidential file mode and would follow Run chmod 640 report.txt; it is not the principal result of Run chmod u+x deploy.sh.

C:

This outcome belongs to executable public directory mode and would follow Run chmod 755 tools/; it is not the principal result of Run chmod u+x deploy.sh.

D:

This outcome belongs to change file owner and would follow Run sudo chown alice notes.txt; it is not the principal result of Run chmod u+x deploy.sh.

Question 559

A script owned by a user is readable but not executable by that owner. A teammate tries this different approach instead: Run chmod 640 report.txt. The requirement is still unmet. Which corrective action should replace the misapplied approach?

  1. Run chmod 640 report.txt
  2. Run chmod u+x deploy.sh
  3. Run chmod 755 tools/
  4. Run sudo chown alice notes.txt

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Replace the attempt with this step: The symbolic u+x form adds execute permission for the owning user. It fits make owner script executable.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This step is specific to restrict confidential file mode: Mode 640 grants rw- to owner, r-- to group and --- to others. It does not fix the stated requirement for make owner script executable.

C:

This step is specific to executable public directory mode: Mode 755 grants owner rwx and group/others r-x, allowing traversal but not modification by others. It does not fix the stated requirement for make owner script executable.

D:

This step is specific to change file owner: chown changes the ownership UID associated with the file. It does not fix the stated requirement for make owner script executable.

Question 560

A script owned by a user is readable but not executable by that owner. One student proposes Run chmod u+x deploy.sh and another proposes Run chmod 755 tools/. Which technical comparison is the soundest?

  1. Run chmod 755 tools/ is more directly suited to make owner script executable than Run chmod u+x deploy.sh, regardless of the stated constraint.
  2. The two actions are interchangeable for make owner script executable and necessarily have the same main result.
  3. Run chmod u+x deploy.sh is used because The symbolic u+x form adds execute permission for the owning user. The alternative Run chmod 755 tools/ addresses executable public directory mode instead.
  4. Run sudo chown alice notes.txt is the only useful action for make owner script executable; Run chmod u+x deploy.sh has no relevant effect.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Correct distinction: Run chmod u+x deploy.sh targets make owner script executable; The symbolic u+x form adds execute permission for the owning user. The compared alternative instead serves executable public directory mode.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Incorrect mapping: Run chmod 755 tools/ is used for executable public directory mode. It does not displace Run chmod u+x deploy.sh for the described requirement.

B:

The mechanisms are different: The symbolic u+x form adds execute permission for the owning user. By contrast, Mode 755 grants owner rwx and group/others r-x, allowing traversal but not modification by others. They are not universally interchangeable.

D:

The third option addresses change file owner: chown changes the ownership UID associated with the file. The original action remains relevant because The symbolic u+x form adds execute permission for the owning user.