McAfee-Secured Website

Exam Bundle

Exam Code: 350-701

Exam Name Implementing and Operating Cisco Security Core Technologies

Certification Provider: Cisco

Corresponding Certifications: CCIE Security , CCNP Security

Cisco 350-701 Bundle $44.99

100% Cisco 350-701 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real 350-701 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    350-701 Questions & Answers

    789 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual 350-701 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • 350-701 Video Course

    350-701 Video Course

    299 Video Lectures

    350-701 Video Course is developed by Cisco Professionals to help you pass the 350-701 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Implementing and Operating Cisco Security Core Technologies exam.
  • Study Guide

    350-701 Study Guide

    701 PDF Pages

    Developed by industry experts, this 701-page guide spells out in painstaking detail all of the information you need to ace 350-701 exam.

Implementing and Operating Cisco Security Core Technologies (350-701) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $194.97
Bundle Price: $149.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    789 Questions

    $124.99
  • 350-701 Video Course

    Video Course

    299 Video Lectures

    $39.99
  • Study Guide

    Study Guide

    701 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Cisco 350-701 Practice Test 24

Question 230

At Aspen Digital, a team reports that it corrected the following problem affecting advisory applications and shared files: A security automation calls a REST endpoint with GET to perform a state change and ignores the documented API semantics. Which observation BEST verifies that the correction actually worked?

  1. An integration test confirms read calls cannot mutate resources and a correct write is audited.
  2. A timeout replay leaves one intended policy object and logs a definitive final state.
  3. The collected count matches the API's reported total without duplicate events.
  4. A schema-change test fails safely with a useful diagnostic rather than applying an incorrect policy.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

An integration test confirms read calls cannot mutate resources and a correct write is audited. This is the decisive evidence for the original problem: A security automation calls a REST endpoint with GET to perform a state change and ignores the documented API semantics. It verifies that the intended corrective control—Use the documented HTTP method and schema and validate desired operation before execution—works in the relevant environment; a completed change ticket alone would not prove the outcome at Aspen Digital.

Incorrect Answers

B:

A timeout replay leaves one intended policy object and logs a definitive final state. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: A script repeats a failed create request after a network timeout and generates duplicate security objects, usually addressed by Use supported idempotent operations or check for an existing resource before retrying writes. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Aspen Digital was resolved. The specific required evidence is: An integration test confirms read calls cannot mutate resources and a correct write is audited.

C:

The collected count matches the API's reported total without duplicate events. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: A script calls a paginated security events endpoint once and silently omits later pages, usually addressed by Iterate documented pagination links or continuation tokens until the bounded result set is exhausted. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Aspen Digital was resolved. The specific required evidence is: An integration test confirms read calls cannot mutate resources and a correct write is audited.

D:

A schema-change test fails safely with a useful diagnostic rather than applying an incorrect policy. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: An orchestration script receives JSON from a firewall API but assumes a field is always present and crashes, usually addressed by Validate response structure and handle missing fields and error codes explicitly. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Aspen Digital was resolved. The specific required evidence is: An integration test confirms read calls cannot mutate resources and a correct write is audited.

Question 231

A security engineer at Copper Hill Studios reviews digital assets and partner collaboration as part of a planned service expansion. The observed problem is: A security automation calls a REST endpoint with GET to perform a state change and ignores the documented API semantics. What is the BEST corrective action?

  1. Use supported idempotent operations or check for an existing resource before retrying writes.
  2. Read credentials from an approved secret store or short-lived token service with least privilege.
  3. Use the documented HTTP method and schema and validate desired operation before execution.
  4. Check HTTP status, parse structured errors, and confirm device state after the request.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Use the documented HTTP method and schema and validate desired operation before execution. This directly addresses the documented failure: A security automation calls a REST endpoint with GET to perform a state change and ignores the documented API semantics. For the Copper Hill Studios environment, the measurable success condition is: An integration test confirms read calls cannot mutate resources and a correct write is audited. This control targets the specific failure rather than merely changing an unrelated security setting.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Use supported idempotent operations or check for an existing resource before retrying writes. That action fits another problem: A script repeats a failed create request after a network timeout and generates duplicate security objects. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Copper Hill Studios: A security automation calls a REST endpoint with GET to perform a state change and ignores the documented API semantics. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Use the documented HTTP method and schema and validate desired operation before execution.

B:

Read credentials from an approved secret store or short-lived token service with least privilege. That action fits another problem: A Python script embeds a permanent security administrator API key in source code. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Copper Hill Studios: A security automation calls a REST endpoint with GET to perform a state change and ignores the documented API semantics. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Use the documented HTTP method and schema and validate desired operation before execution.

D:

Check HTTP status, parse structured errors, and confirm device state after the request. That action fits another problem: An automation script posts configuration updates to a firewall API without validating the HTTP response. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Copper Hill Studios: A security automation calls a REST endpoint with GET to perform a state change and ignores the documented API semantics. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Use the documented HTTP method and schema and validate desired operation before execution.

Question 232

During a planned service expansion at Copper Hill Studios, engineers say that they resolved this finding: A security automation calls a REST endpoint with GET to perform a state change and ignores the documented API semantics. Which result provides the STRONGEST acceptance evidence?

  1. An integration test confirms read calls cannot mutate resources and a correct write is audited.
  2. Source inspection finds no active secret and the intended API call succeeds under a scoped identity.
  3. A simulated 401 or 500 response is reported as failure and a successful change is read back.
  4. A timeout replay leaves one intended policy object and logs a definitive final state.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

An integration test confirms read calls cannot mutate resources and a correct write is audited. This is the decisive evidence for the original problem: A security automation calls a REST endpoint with GET to perform a state change and ignores the documented API semantics. It verifies that the intended corrective control—Use the documented HTTP method and schema and validate desired operation before execution—works in the relevant environment; a completed change ticket alone would not prove the outcome at Copper Hill Studios.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Source inspection finds no active secret and the intended API call succeeds under a scoped identity. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: A Python script embeds a permanent security administrator API key in source code, usually addressed by Read credentials from an approved secret store or short-lived token service with least privilege. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Copper Hill Studios was resolved. The specific required evidence is: An integration test confirms read calls cannot mutate resources and a correct write is audited.

C:

A simulated 401 or 500 response is reported as failure and a successful change is read back. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: An automation script posts configuration updates to a firewall API without validating the HTTP response, usually addressed by Check HTTP status, parse structured errors, and confirm device state after the request. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Copper Hill Studios was resolved. The specific required evidence is: An integration test confirms read calls cannot mutate resources and a correct write is audited.

D:

A timeout replay leaves one intended policy object and logs a definitive final state. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: A script repeats a failed create request after a network timeout and generates duplicate security objects, usually addressed by Use supported idempotent operations or check for an existing resource before retrying writes. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Copper Hill Studios was resolved. The specific required evidence is: An integration test confirms read calls cannot mutate resources and a correct write is audited.

Question 233

At Orion Network Services, during a privileged access assessment, the security team is examining subscriber services and operations. The finding is: An orchestration script receives JSON from a firewall API but assumes a field is always present and crashes. Which action BEST addresses this specific security issue?

  1. Validate response structure and handle missing fields and error codes explicitly.
  2. Check HTTP status, parse structured errors, and confirm device state after the request.
  3. Use the documented HTTP method and schema and validate desired operation before execution.
  4. Use supported idempotent operations or check for an existing resource before retrying writes.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Validate response structure and handle missing fields and error codes explicitly. This directly addresses the documented failure: An orchestration script receives JSON from a firewall API but assumes a field is always present and crashes. For the Orion Network Services environment, the measurable success condition is: A schema-change test fails safely with a useful diagnostic rather than applying an incorrect policy. This control targets the specific failure rather than merely changing an unrelated security setting.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Check HTTP status, parse structured errors, and confirm device state after the request. That action fits another problem: An automation script posts configuration updates to a firewall API without validating the HTTP response. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Orion Network Services: An orchestration script receives JSON from a firewall API but assumes a field is always present and crashes. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Validate response structure and handle missing fields and error codes explicitly.

C:

Use the documented HTTP method and schema and validate desired operation before execution. That action fits another problem: A security automation calls a REST endpoint with GET to perform a state change and ignores the documented API semantics. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Orion Network Services: An orchestration script receives JSON from a firewall API but assumes a field is always present and crashes. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Validate response structure and handle missing fields and error codes explicitly.

D:

Use supported idempotent operations or check for an existing resource before retrying writes. That action fits another problem: A script repeats a failed create request after a network timeout and generates duplicate security objects. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Orion Network Services: An orchestration script receives JSON from a firewall API but assumes a field is always present and crashes. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Validate response structure and handle missing fields and error codes explicitly.

Question 234

At Orion Network Services, a team reports that it corrected the following problem affecting subscriber services and operations: An orchestration script receives JSON from a firewall API but assumes a field is always present and crashes. Which observation BEST verifies that the correction actually worked?

  1. An integration test confirms read calls cannot mutate resources and a correct write is audited.
  2. A simulated 401 or 500 response is reported as failure and a successful change is read back.
  3. A timeout replay leaves one intended policy object and logs a definitive final state.
  4. A schema-change test fails safely with a useful diagnostic rather than applying an incorrect policy.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

A schema-change test fails safely with a useful diagnostic rather than applying an incorrect policy. This is the decisive evidence for the original problem: An orchestration script receives JSON from a firewall API but assumes a field is always present and crashes. It verifies that the intended corrective control—Validate response structure and handle missing fields and error codes explicitly—works in the relevant environment; a completed change ticket alone would not prove the outcome at Orion Network Services.

Incorrect Answers

A:

An integration test confirms read calls cannot mutate resources and a correct write is audited. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: A security automation calls a REST endpoint with GET to perform a state change and ignores the documented API semantics, usually addressed by Use the documented HTTP method and schema and validate desired operation before execution. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Orion Network Services was resolved. The specific required evidence is: A schema-change test fails safely with a useful diagnostic rather than applying an incorrect policy.

B:

A simulated 401 or 500 response is reported as failure and a successful change is read back. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: An automation script posts configuration updates to a firewall API without validating the HTTP response, usually addressed by Check HTTP status, parse structured errors, and confirm device state after the request. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Orion Network Services was resolved. The specific required evidence is: A schema-change test fails safely with a useful diagnostic rather than applying an incorrect policy.

C:

A timeout replay leaves one intended policy object and logs a definitive final state. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: A script repeats a failed create request after a network timeout and generates duplicate security objects, usually addressed by Use supported idempotent operations or check for an existing resource before retrying writes. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Orion Network Services was resolved. The specific required evidence is: A schema-change test fails safely with a useful diagnostic rather than applying an incorrect policy.

Question 235

A security engineer at Northshore Hospitality reviews reservation systems and staff endpoints as part of a cross-team security policy review. The observed problem is: An orchestration script receives JSON from a firewall API but assumes a field is always present and crashes. What is the BEST corrective action?

  1. Validate response structure and handle missing fields and error codes explicitly.
  2. Read credentials from an approved secret store or short-lived token service with least privilege.
  3. Iterate documented pagination links or continuation tokens until the bounded result set is exhausted.
  4. Check HTTP status, parse structured errors, and confirm device state after the request.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Validate response structure and handle missing fields and error codes explicitly. This directly addresses the documented failure: An orchestration script receives JSON from a firewall API but assumes a field is always present and crashes. For the Northshore Hospitality environment, the measurable success condition is: A schema-change test fails safely with a useful diagnostic rather than applying an incorrect policy. This control targets the specific failure rather than merely changing an unrelated security setting.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Read credentials from an approved secret store or short-lived token service with least privilege. That action fits another problem: A Python script embeds a permanent security administrator API key in source code. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Northshore Hospitality: An orchestration script receives JSON from a firewall API but assumes a field is always present and crashes. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Validate response structure and handle missing fields and error codes explicitly.

C:

Iterate documented pagination links or continuation tokens until the bounded result set is exhausted. That action fits another problem: A script calls a paginated security events endpoint once and silently omits later pages. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Northshore Hospitality: An orchestration script receives JSON from a firewall API but assumes a field is always present and crashes. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Validate response structure and handle missing fields and error codes explicitly.

D:

Check HTTP status, parse structured errors, and confirm device state after the request. That action fits another problem: An automation script posts configuration updates to a firewall API without validating the HTTP response. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Northshore Hospitality: An orchestration script receives JSON from a firewall API but assumes a field is always present and crashes. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Validate response structure and handle missing fields and error codes explicitly.

Question 236

During a cross-team security policy review at Northshore Hospitality, engineers say that they resolved this finding: An orchestration script receives JSON from a firewall API but assumes a field is always present and crashes. Which result provides the STRONGEST acceptance evidence?

  1. The collected count matches the API's reported total without duplicate events.
  2. A schema-change test fails safely with a useful diagnostic rather than applying an incorrect policy.
  3. Source inspection finds no active secret and the intended API call succeeds under a scoped identity.
  4. A simulated 401 or 500 response is reported as failure and a successful change is read back.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

A schema-change test fails safely with a useful diagnostic rather than applying an incorrect policy. This is the decisive evidence for the original problem: An orchestration script receives JSON from a firewall API but assumes a field is always present and crashes. It verifies that the intended corrective control—Validate response structure and handle missing fields and error codes explicitly—works in the relevant environment; a completed change ticket alone would not prove the outcome at Northshore Hospitality.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The collected count matches the API's reported total without duplicate events. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: A script calls a paginated security events endpoint once and silently omits later pages, usually addressed by Iterate documented pagination links or continuation tokens until the bounded result set is exhausted. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Northshore Hospitality was resolved. The specific required evidence is: A schema-change test fails safely with a useful diagnostic rather than applying an incorrect policy.

C:

Source inspection finds no active secret and the intended API call succeeds under a scoped identity. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: A Python script embeds a permanent security administrator API key in source code, usually addressed by Read credentials from an approved secret store or short-lived token service with least privilege. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Northshore Hospitality was resolved. The specific required evidence is: A schema-change test fails safely with a useful diagnostic rather than applying an incorrect policy.

D:

A simulated 401 or 500 response is reported as failure and a successful change is read back. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: An automation script posts configuration updates to a firewall API without validating the HTTP response, usually addressed by Check HTTP status, parse structured errors, and confirm device state after the request. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Northshore Hospitality was resolved. The specific required evidence is: A schema-change test fails safely with a useful diagnostic rather than applying an incorrect policy.

Question 237

At Arborstone Tech, during an application modernization project, the security team is examining SaaS tenants and operational systems. The finding is: A script repeats a failed create request after a network timeout and generates duplicate security objects. Which action BEST addresses this specific security issue?

  1. Read credentials from an approved secret store or short-lived token service with least privilege.
  2. Use supported idempotent operations or check for an existing resource before retrying writes.
  3. Check HTTP status, parse structured errors, and confirm device state after the request.
  4. Validate response structure and handle missing fields and error codes explicitly.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Use supported idempotent operations or check for an existing resource before retrying writes. This directly addresses the documented failure: A script repeats a failed create request after a network timeout and generates duplicate security objects. For the Arborstone Tech environment, the measurable success condition is: A timeout replay leaves one intended policy object and logs a definitive final state. This control targets the specific failure rather than merely changing an unrelated security setting.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Read credentials from an approved secret store or short-lived token service with least privilege. That action fits another problem: A Python script embeds a permanent security administrator API key in source code. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Arborstone Tech: A script repeats a failed create request after a network timeout and generates duplicate security objects. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Use supported idempotent operations or check for an existing resource before retrying writes.

C:

Check HTTP status, parse structured errors, and confirm device state after the request. That action fits another problem: An automation script posts configuration updates to a firewall API without validating the HTTP response. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Arborstone Tech: A script repeats a failed create request after a network timeout and generates duplicate security objects. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Use supported idempotent operations or check for an existing resource before retrying writes.

D:

Validate response structure and handle missing fields and error codes explicitly. That action fits another problem: An orchestration script receives JSON from a firewall API but assumes a field is always present and crashes. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Arborstone Tech: A script repeats a failed create request after a network timeout and generates duplicate security objects. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Use supported idempotent operations or check for an existing resource before retrying writes.

Question 238

At Arborstone Tech, a team reports that it corrected the following problem affecting SaaS tenants and operational systems: A script repeats a failed create request after a network timeout and generates duplicate security objects. Which observation BEST verifies that the correction actually worked?

  1. A simulated 401 or 500 response is reported as failure and a successful change is read back.
  2. A schema-change test fails safely with a useful diagnostic rather than applying an incorrect policy.
  3. Source inspection finds no active secret and the intended API call succeeds under a scoped identity.
  4. A timeout replay leaves one intended policy object and logs a definitive final state.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

A timeout replay leaves one intended policy object and logs a definitive final state. This is the decisive evidence for the original problem: A script repeats a failed create request after a network timeout and generates duplicate security objects. It verifies that the intended corrective control—Use supported idempotent operations or check for an existing resource before retrying writes—works in the relevant environment; a completed change ticket alone would not prove the outcome at Arborstone Tech.

Incorrect Answers

A:

A simulated 401 or 500 response is reported as failure and a successful change is read back. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: An automation script posts configuration updates to a firewall API without validating the HTTP response, usually addressed by Check HTTP status, parse structured errors, and confirm device state after the request. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Arborstone Tech was resolved. The specific required evidence is: A timeout replay leaves one intended policy object and logs a definitive final state.

B:

A schema-change test fails safely with a useful diagnostic rather than applying an incorrect policy. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: An orchestration script receives JSON from a firewall API but assumes a field is always present and crashes, usually addressed by Validate response structure and handle missing fields and error codes explicitly. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Arborstone Tech was resolved. The specific required evidence is: A timeout replay leaves one intended policy object and logs a definitive final state.

C:

Source inspection finds no active secret and the intended API call succeeds under a scoped identity. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: A Python script embeds a permanent security administrator API key in source code, usually addressed by Read credentials from an approved secret store or short-lived token service with least privilege. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Arborstone Tech was resolved. The specific required evidence is: A timeout replay leaves one intended policy object and logs a definitive final state.

Question 239

A security engineer at Silverline Labs reviews product testing and research networks as part of a privileged access assessment. The observed problem is: A script repeats a failed create request after a network timeout and generates duplicate security objects. What is the BEST corrective action?

  1. Use the documented HTTP method and schema and validate desired operation before execution.
  2. Read credentials from an approved secret store or short-lived token service with least privilege.
  3. Iterate documented pagination links or continuation tokens until the bounded result set is exhausted.
  4. Use supported idempotent operations or check for an existing resource before retrying writes.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Use supported idempotent operations or check for an existing resource before retrying writes. This directly addresses the documented failure: A script repeats a failed create request after a network timeout and generates duplicate security objects. For the Silverline Labs environment, the measurable success condition is: A timeout replay leaves one intended policy object and logs a definitive final state. This control targets the specific failure rather than merely changing an unrelated security setting.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Use the documented HTTP method and schema and validate desired operation before execution. That action fits another problem: A security automation calls a REST endpoint with GET to perform a state change and ignores the documented API semantics. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Silverline Labs: A script repeats a failed create request after a network timeout and generates duplicate security objects. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Use supported idempotent operations or check for an existing resource before retrying writes.

B:

Read credentials from an approved secret store or short-lived token service with least privilege. That action fits another problem: A Python script embeds a permanent security administrator API key in source code. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Silverline Labs: A script repeats a failed create request after a network timeout and generates duplicate security objects. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Use supported idempotent operations or check for an existing resource before retrying writes.

C:

Iterate documented pagination links or continuation tokens until the bounded result set is exhausted. That action fits another problem: A script calls a paginated security events endpoint once and silently omits later pages. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Silverline Labs: A script repeats a failed create request after a network timeout and generates duplicate security objects. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Use supported idempotent operations or check for an existing resource before retrying writes.

Question 240

During a privileged access assessment at Silverline Labs, engineers say that they resolved this finding: A script repeats a failed create request after a network timeout and generates duplicate security objects. Which result provides the STRONGEST acceptance evidence?

  1. A timeout replay leaves one intended policy object and logs a definitive final state.
  2. An integration test confirms read calls cannot mutate resources and a correct write is audited.
  3. The collected count matches the API's reported total without duplicate events.
  4. Source inspection finds no active secret and the intended API call succeeds under a scoped identity.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

A timeout replay leaves one intended policy object and logs a definitive final state. This is the decisive evidence for the original problem: A script repeats a failed create request after a network timeout and generates duplicate security objects. It verifies that the intended corrective control—Use supported idempotent operations or check for an existing resource before retrying writes—works in the relevant environment; a completed change ticket alone would not prove the outcome at Silverline Labs.

Incorrect Answers

B:

An integration test confirms read calls cannot mutate resources and a correct write is audited. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: A security automation calls a REST endpoint with GET to perform a state change and ignores the documented API semantics, usually addressed by Use the documented HTTP method and schema and validate desired operation before execution. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Silverline Labs was resolved. The specific required evidence is: A timeout replay leaves one intended policy object and logs a definitive final state.

C:

The collected count matches the API's reported total without duplicate events. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: A script calls a paginated security events endpoint once and silently omits later pages, usually addressed by Iterate documented pagination links or continuation tokens until the bounded result set is exhausted. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Silverline Labs was resolved. The specific required evidence is: A timeout replay leaves one intended policy object and logs a definitive final state.

D:

Source inspection finds no active secret and the intended API call succeeds under a scoped identity. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: A Python script embeds a permanent security administrator API key in source code, usually addressed by Read credentials from an approved secret store or short-lived token service with least privilege. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Silverline Labs was resolved. The specific required evidence is: A timeout replay leaves one intended policy object and logs a definitive final state.