McAfee-Secured Website

Exam Bundle

Exam Code: 350-701

Exam Name Implementing and Operating Cisco Security Core Technologies

Certification Provider: Cisco

Corresponding Certifications: CCIE Security , CCNP Security

Cisco 350-701 Bundle $44.99

100% Cisco 350-701 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real 350-701 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    350-701 Questions & Answers

    789 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual 350-701 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • 350-701 Video Course

    350-701 Video Course

    299 Video Lectures

    350-701 Video Course is developed by Cisco Professionals to help you pass the 350-701 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Implementing and Operating Cisco Security Core Technologies exam.
  • Study Guide

    350-701 Study Guide

    701 PDF Pages

    Developed by industry experts, this 701-page guide spells out in painstaking detail all of the information you need to ace 350-701 exam.

Implementing and Operating Cisco Security Core Technologies (350-701) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $194.97
Bundle Price: $149.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    789 Questions

    $124.99
  • 350-701 Video Course

    Video Course

    299 Video Lectures

    $39.99
  • Study Guide

    Study Guide

    701 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Cisco 350-701 Practice Test 23

Question 220

During an application modernization project at Lakeview Insurance, engineers say that they resolved this finding: An automation script posts configuration updates to a firewall API without validating the HTTP response. Which result provides the STRONGEST acceptance evidence?

  1. An integration test confirms read calls cannot mutate resources and a correct write is audited.
  2. The collected count matches the API's reported total without duplicate events.
  3. A schema-change test fails safely with a useful diagnostic rather than applying an incorrect policy.
  4. A simulated 401 or 500 response is reported as failure and a successful change is read back.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

A simulated 401 or 500 response is reported as failure and a successful change is read back. This is the decisive evidence for the original problem: An automation script posts configuration updates to a firewall API without validating the HTTP response. It verifies that the intended corrective control—Check HTTP status, parse structured errors, and confirm device state after the request—works in the relevant environment; a completed change ticket alone would not prove the outcome at Lakeview Insurance.

Incorrect Answers

A:

An integration test confirms read calls cannot mutate resources and a correct write is audited. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: A security automation calls a REST endpoint with GET to perform a state change and ignores the documented API semantics, usually addressed by Use the documented HTTP method and schema and validate desired operation before execution. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Lakeview Insurance was resolved. The specific required evidence is: A simulated 401 or 500 response is reported as failure and a successful change is read back.

B:

The collected count matches the API's reported total without duplicate events. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: A script calls a paginated security events endpoint once and silently omits later pages, usually addressed by Iterate documented pagination links or continuation tokens until the bounded result set is exhausted. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Lakeview Insurance was resolved. The specific required evidence is: A simulated 401 or 500 response is reported as failure and a successful change is read back.

C:

A schema-change test fails safely with a useful diagnostic rather than applying an incorrect policy. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: An orchestration script receives JSON from a firewall API but assumes a field is always present and crashes, usually addressed by Validate response structure and handle missing fields and error codes explicitly. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Lakeview Insurance was resolved. The specific required evidence is: A simulated 401 or 500 response is reported as failure and a successful change is read back.

Question 221

At Evermere Health, during a security incident tabletop exercise, the security team is examining clinical collaboration and protected records. The finding is: A Python script embeds a permanent security administrator API key in source code. Which action BEST addresses this specific security issue?

  1. Check HTTP status, parse structured errors, and confirm device state after the request.
  2. Use the documented HTTP method and schema and validate desired operation before execution.
  3. Iterate documented pagination links or continuation tokens until the bounded result set is exhausted.
  4. Read credentials from an approved secret store or short-lived token service with least privilege.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Read credentials from an approved secret store or short-lived token service with least privilege. This directly addresses the documented failure: A Python script embeds a permanent security administrator API key in source code. For the Evermere Health environment, the measurable success condition is: Source inspection finds no active secret and the intended API call succeeds under a scoped identity. This control targets the specific failure rather than merely changing an unrelated security setting.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Check HTTP status, parse structured errors, and confirm device state after the request. That action fits another problem: An automation script posts configuration updates to a firewall API without validating the HTTP response. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Evermere Health: A Python script embeds a permanent security administrator API key in source code. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Read credentials from an approved secret store or short-lived token service with least privilege.

B:

Use the documented HTTP method and schema and validate desired operation before execution. That action fits another problem: A security automation calls a REST endpoint with GET to perform a state change and ignores the documented API semantics. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Evermere Health: A Python script embeds a permanent security administrator API key in source code. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Read credentials from an approved secret store or short-lived token service with least privilege.

C:

Iterate documented pagination links or continuation tokens until the bounded result set is exhausted. That action fits another problem: A script calls a paginated security events endpoint once and silently omits later pages. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Evermere Health: A Python script embeds a permanent security administrator API key in source code. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Read credentials from an approved secret store or short-lived token service with least privilege.

Question 222

At Evermere Health, a team reports that it corrected the following problem affecting clinical collaboration and protected records: A Python script embeds a permanent security administrator API key in source code. Which observation BEST verifies that the correction actually worked?

  1. Source inspection finds no active secret and the intended API call succeeds under a scoped identity.
  2. The collected count matches the API's reported total without duplicate events.
  3. A simulated 401 or 500 response is reported as failure and a successful change is read back.
  4. An integration test confirms read calls cannot mutate resources and a correct write is audited.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Source inspection finds no active secret and the intended API call succeeds under a scoped identity. This is the decisive evidence for the original problem: A Python script embeds a permanent security administrator API key in source code. It verifies that the intended corrective control—Read credentials from an approved secret store or short-lived token service with least privilege—works in the relevant environment; a completed change ticket alone would not prove the outcome at Evermere Health.

Incorrect Answers

B:

The collected count matches the API's reported total without duplicate events. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: A script calls a paginated security events endpoint once and silently omits later pages, usually addressed by Iterate documented pagination links or continuation tokens until the bounded result set is exhausted. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Evermere Health was resolved. The specific required evidence is: Source inspection finds no active secret and the intended API call succeeds under a scoped identity.

C:

A simulated 401 or 500 response is reported as failure and a successful change is read back. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: An automation script posts configuration updates to a firewall API without validating the HTTP response, usually addressed by Check HTTP status, parse structured errors, and confirm device state after the request. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Evermere Health was resolved. The specific required evidence is: Source inspection finds no active secret and the intended API call succeeds under a scoped identity.

D:

An integration test confirms read calls cannot mutate resources and a correct write is audited. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: A security automation calls a REST endpoint with GET to perform a state change and ignores the documented API semantics, usually addressed by Use the documented HTTP method and schema and validate desired operation before execution. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Evermere Health was resolved. The specific required evidence is: Source inspection finds no active secret and the intended API call succeeds under a scoped identity.

Question 223

A security engineer at Brightstone Legal reviews client matters and confidential documents as part of a scheduled security controls review. The observed problem is: A Python script embeds a permanent security administrator API key in source code. What is the BEST corrective action?

  1. Validate response structure and handle missing fields and error codes explicitly.
  2. Use the documented HTTP method and schema and validate desired operation before execution.
  3. Use supported idempotent operations or check for an existing resource before retrying writes.
  4. Read credentials from an approved secret store or short-lived token service with least privilege.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Read credentials from an approved secret store or short-lived token service with least privilege. This directly addresses the documented failure: A Python script embeds a permanent security administrator API key in source code. For the Brightstone Legal environment, the measurable success condition is: Source inspection finds no active secret and the intended API call succeeds under a scoped identity. This control targets the specific failure rather than merely changing an unrelated security setting.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Validate response structure and handle missing fields and error codes explicitly. That action fits another problem: An orchestration script receives JSON from a firewall API but assumes a field is always present and crashes. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Brightstone Legal: A Python script embeds a permanent security administrator API key in source code. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Read credentials from an approved secret store or short-lived token service with least privilege.

B:

Use the documented HTTP method and schema and validate desired operation before execution. That action fits another problem: A security automation calls a REST endpoint with GET to perform a state change and ignores the documented API semantics. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Brightstone Legal: A Python script embeds a permanent security administrator API key in source code. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Read credentials from an approved secret store or short-lived token service with least privilege.

C:

Use supported idempotent operations or check for an existing resource before retrying writes. That action fits another problem: A script repeats a failed create request after a network timeout and generates duplicate security objects. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Brightstone Legal: A Python script embeds a permanent security administrator API key in source code. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Read credentials from an approved secret store or short-lived token service with least privilege.

Question 224

During a scheduled security controls review at Brightstone Legal, engineers say that they resolved this finding: A Python script embeds a permanent security administrator API key in source code. Which result provides the STRONGEST acceptance evidence?

  1. An integration test confirms read calls cannot mutate resources and a correct write is audited.
  2. Source inspection finds no active secret and the intended API call succeeds under a scoped identity.
  3. A timeout replay leaves one intended policy object and logs a definitive final state.
  4. A schema-change test fails safely with a useful diagnostic rather than applying an incorrect policy.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Source inspection finds no active secret and the intended API call succeeds under a scoped identity. This is the decisive evidence for the original problem: A Python script embeds a permanent security administrator API key in source code. It verifies that the intended corrective control—Read credentials from an approved secret store or short-lived token service with least privilege—works in the relevant environment; a completed change ticket alone would not prove the outcome at Brightstone Legal.

Incorrect Answers

A:

An integration test confirms read calls cannot mutate resources and a correct write is audited. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: A security automation calls a REST endpoint with GET to perform a state change and ignores the documented API semantics, usually addressed by Use the documented HTTP method and schema and validate desired operation before execution. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Brightstone Legal was resolved. The specific required evidence is: Source inspection finds no active secret and the intended API call succeeds under a scoped identity.

C:

A timeout replay leaves one intended policy object and logs a definitive final state. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: A script repeats a failed create request after a network timeout and generates duplicate security objects, usually addressed by Use supported idempotent operations or check for an existing resource before retrying writes. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Brightstone Legal was resolved. The specific required evidence is: Source inspection finds no active secret and the intended API call succeeds under a scoped identity.

D:

A schema-change test fails safely with a useful diagnostic rather than applying an incorrect policy. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: An orchestration script receives JSON from a firewall API but assumes a field is always present and crashes, usually addressed by Validate response structure and handle missing fields and error codes explicitly. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Brightstone Legal was resolved. The specific required evidence is: Source inspection finds no active secret and the intended API call succeeds under a scoped identity.

Question 225

At Vantage Travel, during a planned service expansion, the security team is examining booking applications and employee networks. The finding is: A script calls a paginated security events endpoint once and silently omits later pages. Which action BEST addresses this specific security issue?

  1. Validate response structure and handle missing fields and error codes explicitly.
  2. Iterate documented pagination links or continuation tokens until the bounded result set is exhausted.
  3. Use the documented HTTP method and schema and validate desired operation before execution.
  4. Read credentials from an approved secret store or short-lived token service with least privilege.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Iterate documented pagination links or continuation tokens until the bounded result set is exhausted. This directly addresses the documented failure: A script calls a paginated security events endpoint once and silently omits later pages. For the Vantage Travel environment, the measurable success condition is: The collected count matches the API's reported total without duplicate events. This control targets the specific failure rather than merely changing an unrelated security setting.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Validate response structure and handle missing fields and error codes explicitly. That action fits another problem: An orchestration script receives JSON from a firewall API but assumes a field is always present and crashes. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Vantage Travel: A script calls a paginated security events endpoint once and silently omits later pages. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Iterate documented pagination links or continuation tokens until the bounded result set is exhausted.

C:

Use the documented HTTP method and schema and validate desired operation before execution. That action fits another problem: A security automation calls a REST endpoint with GET to perform a state change and ignores the documented API semantics. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Vantage Travel: A script calls a paginated security events endpoint once and silently omits later pages. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Iterate documented pagination links or continuation tokens until the bounded result set is exhausted.

D:

Read credentials from an approved secret store or short-lived token service with least privilege. That action fits another problem: A Python script embeds a permanent security administrator API key in source code. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Vantage Travel: A script calls a paginated security events endpoint once and silently omits later pages. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Iterate documented pagination links or continuation tokens until the bounded result set is exhausted.

Question 226

At Vantage Travel, a team reports that it corrected the following problem affecting booking applications and employee networks: A script calls a paginated security events endpoint once and silently omits later pages. Which observation BEST verifies that the correction actually worked?

  1. Source inspection finds no active secret and the intended API call succeeds under a scoped identity.
  2. An integration test confirms read calls cannot mutate resources and a correct write is audited.
  3. The collected count matches the API's reported total without duplicate events.
  4. A schema-change test fails safely with a useful diagnostic rather than applying an incorrect policy.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

The collected count matches the API's reported total without duplicate events. This is the decisive evidence for the original problem: A script calls a paginated security events endpoint once and silently omits later pages. It verifies that the intended corrective control—Iterate documented pagination links or continuation tokens until the bounded result set is exhausted—works in the relevant environment; a completed change ticket alone would not prove the outcome at Vantage Travel.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Source inspection finds no active secret and the intended API call succeeds under a scoped identity. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: A Python script embeds a permanent security administrator API key in source code, usually addressed by Read credentials from an approved secret store or short-lived token service with least privilege. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Vantage Travel was resolved. The specific required evidence is: The collected count matches the API's reported total without duplicate events.

B:

An integration test confirms read calls cannot mutate resources and a correct write is audited. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: A security automation calls a REST endpoint with GET to perform a state change and ignores the documented API semantics, usually addressed by Use the documented HTTP method and schema and validate desired operation before execution. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Vantage Travel was resolved. The specific required evidence is: The collected count matches the API's reported total without duplicate events.

D:

A schema-change test fails safely with a useful diagnostic rather than applying an incorrect policy. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: An orchestration script receives JSON from a firewall API but assumes a field is always present and crashes, usually addressed by Validate response structure and handle missing fields and error codes explicitly. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Vantage Travel was resolved. The specific required evidence is: The collected count matches the API's reported total without duplicate events.

Question 227

A security engineer at Evergreen Hospital reviews care coordination and employee identity as part of a security incident tabletop exercise. The observed problem is: A script calls a paginated security events endpoint once and silently omits later pages. What is the BEST corrective action?

  1. Use supported idempotent operations or check for an existing resource before retrying writes.
  2. Check HTTP status, parse structured errors, and confirm device state after the request.
  3. Iterate documented pagination links or continuation tokens until the bounded result set is exhausted.
  4. Validate response structure and handle missing fields and error codes explicitly.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Iterate documented pagination links or continuation tokens until the bounded result set is exhausted. This directly addresses the documented failure: A script calls a paginated security events endpoint once and silently omits later pages. For the Evergreen Hospital environment, the measurable success condition is: The collected count matches the API's reported total without duplicate events. This control targets the specific failure rather than merely changing an unrelated security setting.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Use supported idempotent operations or check for an existing resource before retrying writes. That action fits another problem: A script repeats a failed create request after a network timeout and generates duplicate security objects. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Evergreen Hospital: A script calls a paginated security events endpoint once and silently omits later pages. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Iterate documented pagination links or continuation tokens until the bounded result set is exhausted.

B:

Check HTTP status, parse structured errors, and confirm device state after the request. That action fits another problem: An automation script posts configuration updates to a firewall API without validating the HTTP response. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Evergreen Hospital: A script calls a paginated security events endpoint once and silently omits later pages. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Iterate documented pagination links or continuation tokens until the bounded result set is exhausted.

D:

Validate response structure and handle missing fields and error codes explicitly. That action fits another problem: An orchestration script receives JSON from a firewall API but assumes a field is always present and crashes. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Evergreen Hospital: A script calls a paginated security events endpoint once and silently omits later pages. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Iterate documented pagination links or continuation tokens until the bounded result set is exhausted.

Question 228

During a security incident tabletop exercise at Evergreen Hospital, engineers say that they resolved this finding: A script calls a paginated security events endpoint once and silently omits later pages. Which result provides the STRONGEST acceptance evidence?

  1. The collected count matches the API's reported total without duplicate events.
  2. A simulated 401 or 500 response is reported as failure and a successful change is read back.
  3. A schema-change test fails safely with a useful diagnostic rather than applying an incorrect policy.
  4. A timeout replay leaves one intended policy object and logs a definitive final state.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The collected count matches the API's reported total without duplicate events. This is the decisive evidence for the original problem: A script calls a paginated security events endpoint once and silently omits later pages. It verifies that the intended corrective control—Iterate documented pagination links or continuation tokens until the bounded result set is exhausted—works in the relevant environment; a completed change ticket alone would not prove the outcome at Evergreen Hospital.

Incorrect Answers

B:

A simulated 401 or 500 response is reported as failure and a successful change is read back. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: An automation script posts configuration updates to a firewall API without validating the HTTP response, usually addressed by Check HTTP status, parse structured errors, and confirm device state after the request. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Evergreen Hospital was resolved. The specific required evidence is: The collected count matches the API's reported total without duplicate events.

C:

A schema-change test fails safely with a useful diagnostic rather than applying an incorrect policy. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: An orchestration script receives JSON from a firewall API but assumes a field is always present and crashes, usually addressed by Validate response structure and handle missing fields and error codes explicitly. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Evergreen Hospital was resolved. The specific required evidence is: The collected count matches the API's reported total without duplicate events.

D:

A timeout replay leaves one intended policy object and logs a definitive final state. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: A script repeats a failed create request after a network timeout and generates duplicate security objects, usually addressed by Use supported idempotent operations or check for an existing resource before retrying writes. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Evergreen Hospital was resolved. The specific required evidence is: The collected count matches the API's reported total without duplicate events.

Question 229

At Aspen Digital, during a cross-team security policy review, the security team is examining advisory applications and shared files. The finding is: A security automation calls a REST endpoint with GET to perform a state change and ignores the documented API semantics. Which action BEST addresses this specific security issue?

  1. Use supported idempotent operations or check for an existing resource before retrying writes.
  2. Iterate documented pagination links or continuation tokens until the bounded result set is exhausted.
  3. Use the documented HTTP method and schema and validate desired operation before execution.
  4. Validate response structure and handle missing fields and error codes explicitly.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Use the documented HTTP method and schema and validate desired operation before execution. This directly addresses the documented failure: A security automation calls a REST endpoint with GET to perform a state change and ignores the documented API semantics. For the Aspen Digital environment, the measurable success condition is: An integration test confirms read calls cannot mutate resources and a correct write is audited. This control targets the specific failure rather than merely changing an unrelated security setting.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Use supported idempotent operations or check for an existing resource before retrying writes. That action fits another problem: A script repeats a failed create request after a network timeout and generates duplicate security objects. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Aspen Digital: A security automation calls a REST endpoint with GET to perform a state change and ignores the documented API semantics. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Use the documented HTTP method and schema and validate desired operation before execution.

B:

Iterate documented pagination links or continuation tokens until the bounded result set is exhausted. That action fits another problem: A script calls a paginated security events endpoint once and silently omits later pages. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Aspen Digital: A security automation calls a REST endpoint with GET to perform a state change and ignores the documented API semantics. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Use the documented HTTP method and schema and validate desired operation before execution.

D:

Validate response structure and handle missing fields and error codes explicitly. That action fits another problem: An orchestration script receives JSON from a firewall API but assumes a field is always present and crashes. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Aspen Digital: A security automation calls a REST endpoint with GET to perform a state change and ignores the documented API semantics. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Use the documented HTTP method and schema and validate desired operation before execution.

Question 230

At Aspen Digital, a team reports that it corrected the following problem affecting advisory applications and shared files: A security automation calls a REST endpoint with GET to perform a state change and ignores the documented API semantics. Which observation BEST verifies that the correction actually worked?

  1. An integration test confirms read calls cannot mutate resources and a correct write is audited.
  2. A timeout replay leaves one intended policy object and logs a definitive final state.
  3. The collected count matches the API's reported total without duplicate events.
  4. A schema-change test fails safely with a useful diagnostic rather than applying an incorrect policy.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

An integration test confirms read calls cannot mutate resources and a correct write is audited. This is the decisive evidence for the original problem: A security automation calls a REST endpoint with GET to perform a state change and ignores the documented API semantics. It verifies that the intended corrective control—Use the documented HTTP method and schema and validate desired operation before execution—works in the relevant environment; a completed change ticket alone would not prove the outcome at Aspen Digital.

Incorrect Answers

B:

A timeout replay leaves one intended policy object and logs a definitive final state. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: A script repeats a failed create request after a network timeout and generates duplicate security objects, usually addressed by Use supported idempotent operations or check for an existing resource before retrying writes. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Aspen Digital was resolved. The specific required evidence is: An integration test confirms read calls cannot mutate resources and a correct write is audited.

C:

The collected count matches the API's reported total without duplicate events. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: A script calls a paginated security events endpoint once and silently omits later pages, usually addressed by Iterate documented pagination links or continuation tokens until the bounded result set is exhausted. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Aspen Digital was resolved. The specific required evidence is: An integration test confirms read calls cannot mutate resources and a correct write is audited.

D:

A schema-change test fails safely with a useful diagnostic rather than applying an incorrect policy. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: An orchestration script receives JSON from a firewall API but assumes a field is always present and crashes, usually addressed by Validate response structure and handle missing fields and error codes explicitly. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Aspen Digital was resolved. The specific required evidence is: An integration test confirms read calls cannot mutate resources and a correct write is audited.