McAfee-Secured Website

Exam Bundle

Exam Code: 350-701

Exam Name Implementing and Operating Cisco Security Core Technologies

Certification Provider: Cisco

Corresponding Certifications: CCIE Security , CCNP Security

Cisco 350-701 Bundle $44.99

100% Cisco 350-701 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real 350-701 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    350-701 Questions & Answers

    789 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual 350-701 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • 350-701 Video Course

    350-701 Video Course

    299 Video Lectures

    350-701 Video Course is developed by Cisco Professionals to help you pass the 350-701 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Implementing and Operating Cisco Security Core Technologies exam.
  • Study Guide

    350-701 Study Guide

    701 PDF Pages

    Developed by industry experts, this 701-page guide spells out in painstaking detail all of the information you need to ace 350-701 exam.

Implementing and Operating Cisco Security Core Technologies (350-701) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $194.97
Bundle Price: $149.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    789 Questions

    $124.99
  • 350-701 Video Course

    Video Course

    299 Video Lectures

    $39.99
  • Study Guide

    Study Guide

    701 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Cisco 350-701 Practice Test 109

Question 1080

During a privileged access assessment at Atlas Scientific, engineers say that they resolved this finding: An 802.1X laptop authenticates successfully but receives the wrong VLAN due to an authorization profile mismatch. Which result provides the STRONGEST acceptance evidence?

  1. The known printer reaches only its required service while unknown MAC addresses remain restricted.
  2. The laptop receives its assigned VLAN and the policy hit is visible in ISE logs.
  3. 802.1X requests reach the new ISE node and successful authentications are logged.
  4. A spoofed unknown endpoint cannot obtain privileged user-network resources.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The laptop receives its assigned VLAN and the policy hit is visible in ISE logs. This is the decisive evidence for the original problem: An 802.1X laptop authenticates successfully but receives the wrong VLAN due to an authorization profile mismatch. It verifies that the intended corrective control—Inspect ISE policy set conditions and the RADIUS authorization result delivered to the switch—works in the relevant environment; a completed change ticket alone would not prove the outcome at Atlas Scientific.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The known printer reaches only its required service while unknown MAC addresses remain restricted. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: A printer lacks an 802.1X supplicant but must join a restricted service network, usually addressed by Use Cisco ISE MAC Authentication Bypass with constrained authorization and device profiling. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Atlas Scientific was resolved. The specific required evidence is: The laptop receives its assigned VLAN and the policy hit is visible in ISE logs.

C:

802.1X requests reach the new ISE node and successful authentications are logged. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: The switch sends RADIUS to an old ISE address and all port authentication times out after a server migration, usually addressed by Update the network device AAA server configuration and confirm reachability and shared secret. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Atlas Scientific was resolved. The specific required evidence is: The laptop receives its assigned VLAN and the policy hit is visible in ISE logs.

D:

A spoofed unknown endpoint cannot obtain privileged user-network resources. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: An access policy grants privileged access based only on a claimed device MAC address, usually addressed by Combine MAB with profiling, segmentation, and stronger identity controls where possible. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Atlas Scientific was resolved. The specific required evidence is: The laptop receives its assigned VLAN and the policy hit is visible in ISE logs.

Question 1081

At Pinecrest Research, during a scheduled security controls review, the security team is examining research data and distributed collaboration. The finding is: The switch sends RADIUS to an old ISE address and all port authentication times out after a server migration. Which action BEST addresses this specific security issue?

  1. Inspect ISE policy set conditions and the RADIUS authorization result delivered to the switch.
  2. Configure closed or appropriately restricted authentication behavior with an explicit fallback design.
  3. Update the network device AAA server configuration and confirm reachability and shared secret.
  4. Use Cisco ISE MAC Authentication Bypass with constrained authorization and device profiling.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Update the network device AAA server configuration and confirm reachability and shared secret. This directly addresses the documented failure: The switch sends RADIUS to an old ISE address and all port authentication times out after a server migration. For the Pinecrest Research environment, the measurable success condition is: 802.1X requests reach the new ISE node and successful authentications are logged. This control targets the specific failure rather than merely changing an unrelated security setting.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Inspect ISE policy set conditions and the RADIUS authorization result delivered to the switch. That action fits another problem: An 802.1X laptop authenticates successfully but receives the wrong VLAN due to an authorization profile mismatch. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Pinecrest Research: The switch sends RADIUS to an old ISE address and all port authentication times out after a server migration. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Update the network device AAA server configuration and confirm reachability and shared secret.

B:

Configure closed or appropriately restricted authentication behavior with an explicit fallback design. That action fits another problem: An access switch port allows unauthenticated clients onto a production VLAN when 802.1X fails. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Pinecrest Research: The switch sends RADIUS to an old ISE address and all port authentication times out after a server migration. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Update the network device AAA server configuration and confirm reachability and shared secret.

D:

Use Cisco ISE MAC Authentication Bypass with constrained authorization and device profiling. That action fits another problem: A printer lacks an 802.1X supplicant but must join a restricted service network. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Pinecrest Research: The switch sends RADIUS to an old ISE address and all port authentication times out after a server migration. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Update the network device AAA server configuration and confirm reachability and shared secret.

Question 1082

At Pinecrest Research, a team reports that it corrected the following problem affecting research data and distributed collaboration: The switch sends RADIUS to an old ISE address and all port authentication times out after a server migration. Which observation BEST verifies that the correction actually worked?

  1. An unauthorized test device cannot enter the production VLAN after authentication failure.
  2. 802.1X requests reach the new ISE node and successful authentications are logged.
  3. The known printer reaches only its required service while unknown MAC addresses remain restricted.
  4. The laptop receives its assigned VLAN and the policy hit is visible in ISE logs.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

802.1X requests reach the new ISE node and successful authentications are logged. This is the decisive evidence for the original problem: The switch sends RADIUS to an old ISE address and all port authentication times out after a server migration. It verifies that the intended corrective control—Update the network device AAA server configuration and confirm reachability and shared secret—works in the relevant environment; a completed change ticket alone would not prove the outcome at Pinecrest Research.

Incorrect Answers

A:

An unauthorized test device cannot enter the production VLAN after authentication failure. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: An access switch port allows unauthenticated clients onto a production VLAN when 802.1X fails, usually addressed by Configure closed or appropriately restricted authentication behavior with an explicit fallback design. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Pinecrest Research was resolved. The specific required evidence is: 802.1X requests reach the new ISE node and successful authentications are logged.

C:

The known printer reaches only its required service while unknown MAC addresses remain restricted. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: A printer lacks an 802.1X supplicant but must join a restricted service network, usually addressed by Use Cisco ISE MAC Authentication Bypass with constrained authorization and device profiling. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Pinecrest Research was resolved. The specific required evidence is: 802.1X requests reach the new ISE node and successful authentications are logged.

D:

The laptop receives its assigned VLAN and the policy hit is visible in ISE logs. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: An 802.1X laptop authenticates successfully but receives the wrong VLAN due to an authorization profile mismatch, usually addressed by Inspect ISE policy set conditions and the RADIUS authorization result delivered to the switch. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Pinecrest Research was resolved. The specific required evidence is: 802.1X requests reach the new ISE node and successful authentications are logged.

Question 1083

A security engineer at Briarwood Property Group reviews tenant applications and facility services as part of an application modernization project. The observed problem is: The switch sends RADIUS to an old ISE address and all port authentication times out after a server migration. What is the BEST corrective action?

  1. Update the network device AAA server configuration and confirm reachability and shared secret.
  2. Inspect ISE policy set conditions and the RADIUS authorization result delivered to the switch.
  3. Combine MAB with profiling, segmentation, and stronger identity controls where possible.
  4. Correct authentication method ordering and authorization fallback conditions.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Update the network device AAA server configuration and confirm reachability and shared secret. This directly addresses the documented failure: The switch sends RADIUS to an old ISE address and all port authentication times out after a server migration. For the Briarwood Property Group environment, the measurable success condition is: 802.1X requests reach the new ISE node and successful authentications are logged. This control targets the specific failure rather than merely changing an unrelated security setting.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Inspect ISE policy set conditions and the RADIUS authorization result delivered to the switch. That action fits another problem: An 802.1X laptop authenticates successfully but receives the wrong VLAN due to an authorization profile mismatch. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Briarwood Property Group: The switch sends RADIUS to an old ISE address and all port authentication times out after a server migration. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Update the network device AAA server configuration and confirm reachability and shared secret.

C:

Combine MAB with profiling, segmentation, and stronger identity controls where possible. That action fits another problem: An access policy grants privileged access based only on a claimed device MAC address. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Briarwood Property Group: The switch sends RADIUS to an old ISE address and all port authentication times out after a server migration. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Update the network device AAA server configuration and confirm reachability and shared secret.

D:

Correct authentication method ordering and authorization fallback conditions. That action fits another problem: An organization has separate employee and guest policies but the switch incorrectly falls back to guest VLAN for every failed login. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Briarwood Property Group: The switch sends RADIUS to an old ISE address and all port authentication times out after a server migration. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Update the network device AAA server configuration and confirm reachability and shared secret.

Question 1084

During an application modernization project at Briarwood Property Group, engineers say that they resolved this finding: The switch sends RADIUS to an old ISE address and all port authentication times out after a server migration. Which result provides the STRONGEST acceptance evidence?

  1. A spoofed unknown endpoint cannot obtain privileged user-network resources.
  2. 802.1X requests reach the new ISE node and successful authentications are logged.
  3. Valid employees receive enterprise access and failed or guest sessions receive only restricted access.
  4. The laptop receives its assigned VLAN and the policy hit is visible in ISE logs.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

802.1X requests reach the new ISE node and successful authentications are logged. This is the decisive evidence for the original problem: The switch sends RADIUS to an old ISE address and all port authentication times out after a server migration. It verifies that the intended corrective control—Update the network device AAA server configuration and confirm reachability and shared secret—works in the relevant environment; a completed change ticket alone would not prove the outcome at Briarwood Property Group.

Incorrect Answers

A:

A spoofed unknown endpoint cannot obtain privileged user-network resources. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: An access policy grants privileged access based only on a claimed device MAC address, usually addressed by Combine MAB with profiling, segmentation, and stronger identity controls where possible. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Briarwood Property Group was resolved. The specific required evidence is: 802.1X requests reach the new ISE node and successful authentications are logged.

C:

Valid employees receive enterprise access and failed or guest sessions receive only restricted access. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: An organization has separate employee and guest policies but the switch incorrectly falls back to guest VLAN for every failed login, usually addressed by Correct authentication method ordering and authorization fallback conditions. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Briarwood Property Group was resolved. The specific required evidence is: 802.1X requests reach the new ISE node and successful authentications are logged.

D:

The laptop receives its assigned VLAN and the policy hit is visible in ISE logs. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: An 802.1X laptop authenticates successfully but receives the wrong VLAN due to an authorization profile mismatch, usually addressed by Inspect ISE policy set conditions and the RADIUS authorization result delivered to the switch. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Briarwood Property Group was resolved. The specific required evidence is: 802.1X requests reach the new ISE node and successful authentications are logged.

Question 1085

At Maple Creek Agriculture, during a security incident tabletop exercise, the security team is examining farm operations and logistics analytics. The finding is: An access policy grants privileged access based only on a claimed device MAC address. Which action BEST addresses this specific security issue?

  1. Update the network device AAA server configuration and confirm reachability and shared secret.
  2. Use Cisco ISE MAC Authentication Bypass with constrained authorization and device profiling.
  3. Combine MAB with profiling, segmentation, and stronger identity controls where possible.
  4. Inspect ISE policy set conditions and the RADIUS authorization result delivered to the switch.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Combine MAB with profiling, segmentation, and stronger identity controls where possible. This directly addresses the documented failure: An access policy grants privileged access based only on a claimed device MAC address. For the Maple Creek Agriculture environment, the measurable success condition is: A spoofed unknown endpoint cannot obtain privileged user-network resources. This control targets the specific failure rather than merely changing an unrelated security setting.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Update the network device AAA server configuration and confirm reachability and shared secret. That action fits another problem: The switch sends RADIUS to an old ISE address and all port authentication times out after a server migration. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Maple Creek Agriculture: An access policy grants privileged access based only on a claimed device MAC address. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Combine MAB with profiling, segmentation, and stronger identity controls where possible.

B:

Use Cisco ISE MAC Authentication Bypass with constrained authorization and device profiling. That action fits another problem: A printer lacks an 802.1X supplicant but must join a restricted service network. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Maple Creek Agriculture: An access policy grants privileged access based only on a claimed device MAC address. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Combine MAB with profiling, segmentation, and stronger identity controls where possible.

D:

Inspect ISE policy set conditions and the RADIUS authorization result delivered to the switch. That action fits another problem: An 802.1X laptop authenticates successfully but receives the wrong VLAN due to an authorization profile mismatch. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Maple Creek Agriculture: An access policy grants privileged access based only on a claimed device MAC address. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Combine MAB with profiling, segmentation, and stronger identity controls where possible.

Question 1086

At Maple Creek Agriculture, a team reports that it corrected the following problem affecting farm operations and logistics analytics: An access policy grants privileged access based only on a claimed device MAC address. Which observation BEST verifies that the correction actually worked?

  1. The known printer reaches only its required service while unknown MAC addresses remain restricted.
  2. The laptop receives its assigned VLAN and the policy hit is visible in ISE logs.
  3. A spoofed unknown endpoint cannot obtain privileged user-network resources.
  4. 802.1X requests reach the new ISE node and successful authentications are logged.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

A spoofed unknown endpoint cannot obtain privileged user-network resources. This is the decisive evidence for the original problem: An access policy grants privileged access based only on a claimed device MAC address. It verifies that the intended corrective control—Combine MAB with profiling, segmentation, and stronger identity controls where possible—works in the relevant environment; a completed change ticket alone would not prove the outcome at Maple Creek Agriculture.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The known printer reaches only its required service while unknown MAC addresses remain restricted. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: A printer lacks an 802.1X supplicant but must join a restricted service network, usually addressed by Use Cisco ISE MAC Authentication Bypass with constrained authorization and device profiling. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Maple Creek Agriculture was resolved. The specific required evidence is: A spoofed unknown endpoint cannot obtain privileged user-network resources.

B:

The laptop receives its assigned VLAN and the policy hit is visible in ISE logs. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: An 802.1X laptop authenticates successfully but receives the wrong VLAN due to an authorization profile mismatch, usually addressed by Inspect ISE policy set conditions and the RADIUS authorization result delivered to the switch. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Maple Creek Agriculture was resolved. The specific required evidence is: A spoofed unknown endpoint cannot obtain privileged user-network resources.

D:

802.1X requests reach the new ISE node and successful authentications are logged. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: The switch sends RADIUS to an old ISE address and all port authentication times out after a server migration, usually addressed by Update the network device AAA server configuration and confirm reachability and shared secret. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Maple Creek Agriculture was resolved. The specific required evidence is: A spoofed unknown endpoint cannot obtain privileged user-network resources.

Question 1087

A security engineer at Sapphire Data Systems reviews customer tenant services and cloud infrastructure as part of a scheduled security controls review. The observed problem is: An access policy grants privileged access based only on a claimed device MAC address. What is the BEST corrective action?

  1. Correct authentication method ordering and authorization fallback conditions.
  2. Combine MAB with profiling, segmentation, and stronger identity controls where possible.
  3. Configure closed or appropriately restricted authentication behavior with an explicit fallback design.
  4. Update the network device AAA server configuration and confirm reachability and shared secret.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Combine MAB with profiling, segmentation, and stronger identity controls where possible. This directly addresses the documented failure: An access policy grants privileged access based only on a claimed device MAC address. For the Sapphire Data Systems environment, the measurable success condition is: A spoofed unknown endpoint cannot obtain privileged user-network resources. This control targets the specific failure rather than merely changing an unrelated security setting.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Correct authentication method ordering and authorization fallback conditions. That action fits another problem: An organization has separate employee and guest policies but the switch incorrectly falls back to guest VLAN for every failed login. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Sapphire Data Systems: An access policy grants privileged access based only on a claimed device MAC address. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Combine MAB with profiling, segmentation, and stronger identity controls where possible.

C:

Configure closed or appropriately restricted authentication behavior with an explicit fallback design. That action fits another problem: An access switch port allows unauthenticated clients onto a production VLAN when 802.1X fails. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Sapphire Data Systems: An access policy grants privileged access based only on a claimed device MAC address. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Combine MAB with profiling, segmentation, and stronger identity controls where possible.

D:

Update the network device AAA server configuration and confirm reachability and shared secret. That action fits another problem: The switch sends RADIUS to an old ISE address and all port authentication times out after a server migration. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Sapphire Data Systems: An access policy grants privileged access based only on a claimed device MAC address. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Combine MAB with profiling, segmentation, and stronger identity controls where possible.

Question 1088

During a scheduled security controls review at Sapphire Data Systems, engineers say that they resolved this finding: An access policy grants privileged access based only on a claimed device MAC address. Which result provides the STRONGEST acceptance evidence?

  1. A spoofed unknown endpoint cannot obtain privileged user-network resources.
  2. An unauthorized test device cannot enter the production VLAN after authentication failure.
  3. Valid employees receive enterprise access and failed or guest sessions receive only restricted access.
  4. 802.1X requests reach the new ISE node and successful authentications are logged.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

A spoofed unknown endpoint cannot obtain privileged user-network resources. This is the decisive evidence for the original problem: An access policy grants privileged access based only on a claimed device MAC address. It verifies that the intended corrective control—Combine MAB with profiling, segmentation, and stronger identity controls where possible—works in the relevant environment; a completed change ticket alone would not prove the outcome at Sapphire Data Systems.

Incorrect Answers

B:

An unauthorized test device cannot enter the production VLAN after authentication failure. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: An access switch port allows unauthenticated clients onto a production VLAN when 802.1X fails, usually addressed by Configure closed or appropriately restricted authentication behavior with an explicit fallback design. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Sapphire Data Systems was resolved. The specific required evidence is: A spoofed unknown endpoint cannot obtain privileged user-network resources.

C:

Valid employees receive enterprise access and failed or guest sessions receive only restricted access. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: An organization has separate employee and guest policies but the switch incorrectly falls back to guest VLAN for every failed login, usually addressed by Correct authentication method ordering and authorization fallback conditions. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Sapphire Data Systems was resolved. The specific required evidence is: A spoofed unknown endpoint cannot obtain privileged user-network resources.

D:

802.1X requests reach the new ISE node and successful authentications are logged. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: The switch sends RADIUS to an old ISE address and all port authentication times out after a server migration, usually addressed by Update the network device AAA server configuration and confirm reachability and shared secret. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Sapphire Data Systems was resolved. The specific required evidence is: A spoofed unknown endpoint cannot obtain privileged user-network resources.

Question 1089

At Seabright Municipal Works, during a planned service expansion, the security team is examining public service networks and records. The finding is: An organization has separate employee and guest policies but the switch incorrectly falls back to guest VLAN for every failed login. Which action BEST addresses this specific security issue?

  1. Combine MAB with profiling, segmentation, and stronger identity controls where possible.
  2. Inspect ISE policy set conditions and the RADIUS authorization result delivered to the switch.
  3. Update the network device AAA server configuration and confirm reachability and shared secret.
  4. Correct authentication method ordering and authorization fallback conditions.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Correct authentication method ordering and authorization fallback conditions. This directly addresses the documented failure: An organization has separate employee and guest policies but the switch incorrectly falls back to guest VLAN for every failed login. For the Seabright Municipal Works environment, the measurable success condition is: Valid employees receive enterprise access and failed or guest sessions receive only restricted access. This control targets the specific failure rather than merely changing an unrelated security setting.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Combine MAB with profiling, segmentation, and stronger identity controls where possible. That action fits another problem: An access policy grants privileged access based only on a claimed device MAC address. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Seabright Municipal Works: An organization has separate employee and guest policies but the switch incorrectly falls back to guest VLAN for every failed login. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Correct authentication method ordering and authorization fallback conditions.

B:

Inspect ISE policy set conditions and the RADIUS authorization result delivered to the switch. That action fits another problem: An 802.1X laptop authenticates successfully but receives the wrong VLAN due to an authorization profile mismatch. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Seabright Municipal Works: An organization has separate employee and guest policies but the switch incorrectly falls back to guest VLAN for every failed login. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Correct authentication method ordering and authorization fallback conditions.

C:

Update the network device AAA server configuration and confirm reachability and shared secret. That action fits another problem: The switch sends RADIUS to an old ISE address and all port authentication times out after a server migration. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Seabright Municipal Works: An organization has separate employee and guest policies but the switch incorrectly falls back to guest VLAN for every failed login. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Correct authentication method ordering and authorization fallback conditions.

Question 1090

At Seabright Municipal Works, a team reports that it corrected the following problem affecting public service networks and records: An organization has separate employee and guest policies but the switch incorrectly falls back to guest VLAN for every failed login. Which observation BEST verifies that the correction actually worked?

  1. A spoofed unknown endpoint cannot obtain privileged user-network resources.
  2. Valid employees receive enterprise access and failed or guest sessions receive only restricted access.
  3. 802.1X requests reach the new ISE node and successful authentications are logged.
  4. The laptop receives its assigned VLAN and the policy hit is visible in ISE logs.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Valid employees receive enterprise access and failed or guest sessions receive only restricted access. This is the decisive evidence for the original problem: An organization has separate employee and guest policies but the switch incorrectly falls back to guest VLAN for every failed login. It verifies that the intended corrective control—Correct authentication method ordering and authorization fallback conditions—works in the relevant environment; a completed change ticket alone would not prove the outcome at Seabright Municipal Works.

Incorrect Answers

A:

A spoofed unknown endpoint cannot obtain privileged user-network resources. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: An access policy grants privileged access based only on a claimed device MAC address, usually addressed by Combine MAB with profiling, segmentation, and stronger identity controls where possible. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Seabright Municipal Works was resolved. The specific required evidence is: Valid employees receive enterprise access and failed or guest sessions receive only restricted access.

C:

802.1X requests reach the new ISE node and successful authentications are logged. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: The switch sends RADIUS to an old ISE address and all port authentication times out after a server migration, usually addressed by Update the network device AAA server configuration and confirm reachability and shared secret. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Seabright Municipal Works was resolved. The specific required evidence is: Valid employees receive enterprise access and failed or guest sessions receive only restricted access.

D:

The laptop receives its assigned VLAN and the policy hit is visible in ISE logs. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: An 802.1X laptop authenticates successfully but receives the wrong VLAN due to an authorization profile mismatch, usually addressed by Inspect ISE policy set conditions and the RADIUS authorization result delivered to the switch. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Seabright Municipal Works was resolved. The specific required evidence is: Valid employees receive enterprise access and failed or guest sessions receive only restricted access.