McAfee-Secured Website

Exam Bundle

Exam Code: 350-701

Exam Name Implementing and Operating Cisco Security Core Technologies

Certification Provider: Cisco

Corresponding Certifications: CCIE Security , CCNP Security

Cisco 350-701 Bundle $44.99

100% Cisco 350-701 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real 350-701 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    350-701 Questions & Answers

    789 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual 350-701 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • 350-701 Video Course

    350-701 Video Course

    299 Video Lectures

    350-701 Video Course is developed by Cisco Professionals to help you pass the 350-701 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Implementing and Operating Cisco Security Core Technologies exam.
  • Study Guide

    350-701 Study Guide

    701 PDF Pages

    Developed by industry experts, this 701-page guide spells out in painstaking detail all of the information you need to ace 350-701 exam.

Implementing and Operating Cisco Security Core Technologies (350-701) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $194.97
Bundle Price: $149.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    789 Questions

    $124.99
  • 350-701 Video Course

    Video Course

    299 Video Lectures

    $39.99
  • Study Guide

    Study Guide

    701 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Cisco 350-701 Practice Test 108

Question 1070

At Newbridge Charity, a team reports that it corrected the following problem affecting donation applications and volunteer accounts: An access switch port allows unauthenticated clients onto a production VLAN when 802.1X fails. Which observation BEST verifies that the correction actually worked?

  1. A spoofed unknown endpoint cannot obtain privileged user-network resources.
  2. An unauthorized test device cannot enter the production VLAN after authentication failure.
  3. Valid employees receive enterprise access and failed or guest sessions receive only restricted access.
  4. 802.1X requests reach the new ISE node and successful authentications are logged.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

An unauthorized test device cannot enter the production VLAN after authentication failure. This is the decisive evidence for the original problem: An access switch port allows unauthenticated clients onto a production VLAN when 802.1X fails. It verifies that the intended corrective control—Configure closed or appropriately restricted authentication behavior with an explicit fallback design—works in the relevant environment; a completed change ticket alone would not prove the outcome at Newbridge Charity.

Incorrect Answers

A:

A spoofed unknown endpoint cannot obtain privileged user-network resources. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: An access policy grants privileged access based only on a claimed device MAC address, usually addressed by Combine MAB with profiling, segmentation, and stronger identity controls where possible. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Newbridge Charity was resolved. The specific required evidence is: An unauthorized test device cannot enter the production VLAN after authentication failure.

C:

Valid employees receive enterprise access and failed or guest sessions receive only restricted access. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: An organization has separate employee and guest policies but the switch incorrectly falls back to guest VLAN for every failed login, usually addressed by Correct authentication method ordering and authorization fallback conditions. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Newbridge Charity was resolved. The specific required evidence is: An unauthorized test device cannot enter the production VLAN after authentication failure.

D:

802.1X requests reach the new ISE node and successful authentications are logged. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: The switch sends RADIUS to an old ISE address and all port authentication times out after a server migration, usually addressed by Update the network device AAA server configuration and confirm reachability and shared secret. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Newbridge Charity was resolved. The specific required evidence is: An unauthorized test device cannot enter the production VLAN after authentication failure.

Question 1071

A security engineer at Cedar City Utilities reviews metering and utility service platforms as part of a planned service expansion. The observed problem is: An access switch port allows unauthenticated clients onto a production VLAN when 802.1X fails. What is the BEST corrective action?

  1. Use Cisco ISE MAC Authentication Bypass with constrained authorization and device profiling.
  2. Correct authentication method ordering and authorization fallback conditions.
  3. Inspect ISE policy set conditions and the RADIUS authorization result delivered to the switch.
  4. Configure closed or appropriately restricted authentication behavior with an explicit fallback design.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Configure closed or appropriately restricted authentication behavior with an explicit fallback design. This directly addresses the documented failure: An access switch port allows unauthenticated clients onto a production VLAN when 802.1X fails. For the Cedar City Utilities environment, the measurable success condition is: An unauthorized test device cannot enter the production VLAN after authentication failure. This control targets the specific failure rather than merely changing an unrelated security setting.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Use Cisco ISE MAC Authentication Bypass with constrained authorization and device profiling. That action fits another problem: A printer lacks an 802.1X supplicant but must join a restricted service network. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Cedar City Utilities: An access switch port allows unauthenticated clients onto a production VLAN when 802.1X fails. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Configure closed or appropriately restricted authentication behavior with an explicit fallback design.

B:

Correct authentication method ordering and authorization fallback conditions. That action fits another problem: An organization has separate employee and guest policies but the switch incorrectly falls back to guest VLAN for every failed login. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Cedar City Utilities: An access switch port allows unauthenticated clients onto a production VLAN when 802.1X fails. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Configure closed or appropriately restricted authentication behavior with an explicit fallback design.

C:

Inspect ISE policy set conditions and the RADIUS authorization result delivered to the switch. That action fits another problem: An 802.1X laptop authenticates successfully but receives the wrong VLAN due to an authorization profile mismatch. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Cedar City Utilities: An access switch port allows unauthenticated clients onto a production VLAN when 802.1X fails. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Configure closed or appropriately restricted authentication behavior with an explicit fallback design.

Question 1072

During a planned service expansion at Cedar City Utilities, engineers say that they resolved this finding: An access switch port allows unauthenticated clients onto a production VLAN when 802.1X fails. Which result provides the STRONGEST acceptance evidence?

  1. The known printer reaches only its required service while unknown MAC addresses remain restricted.
  2. Valid employees receive enterprise access and failed or guest sessions receive only restricted access.
  3. An unauthorized test device cannot enter the production VLAN after authentication failure.
  4. The laptop receives its assigned VLAN and the policy hit is visible in ISE logs.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

An unauthorized test device cannot enter the production VLAN after authentication failure. This is the decisive evidence for the original problem: An access switch port allows unauthenticated clients onto a production VLAN when 802.1X fails. It verifies that the intended corrective control—Configure closed or appropriately restricted authentication behavior with an explicit fallback design—works in the relevant environment; a completed change ticket alone would not prove the outcome at Cedar City Utilities.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The known printer reaches only its required service while unknown MAC addresses remain restricted. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: A printer lacks an 802.1X supplicant but must join a restricted service network, usually addressed by Use Cisco ISE MAC Authentication Bypass with constrained authorization and device profiling. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Cedar City Utilities was resolved. The specific required evidence is: An unauthorized test device cannot enter the production VLAN after authentication failure.

B:

Valid employees receive enterprise access and failed or guest sessions receive only restricted access. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: An organization has separate employee and guest policies but the switch incorrectly falls back to guest VLAN for every failed login, usually addressed by Correct authentication method ordering and authorization fallback conditions. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Cedar City Utilities was resolved. The specific required evidence is: An unauthorized test device cannot enter the production VLAN after authentication failure.

D:

The laptop receives its assigned VLAN and the policy hit is visible in ISE logs. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: An 802.1X laptop authenticates successfully but receives the wrong VLAN due to an authorization profile mismatch, usually addressed by Inspect ISE policy set conditions and the RADIUS authorization result delivered to the switch. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Cedar City Utilities was resolved. The specific required evidence is: An unauthorized test device cannot enter the production VLAN after authentication failure.

Question 1073

At Clearbrook University, during a privileged access assessment, the security team is examining campus connectivity and enrollment services. The finding is: A printer lacks an 802.1X supplicant but must join a restricted service network. Which action BEST addresses this specific security issue?

  1. Correct authentication method ordering and authorization fallback conditions.
  2. Use Cisco ISE MAC Authentication Bypass with constrained authorization and device profiling.
  3. Configure closed or appropriately restricted authentication behavior with an explicit fallback design.
  4. Combine MAB with profiling, segmentation, and stronger identity controls where possible.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Use Cisco ISE MAC Authentication Bypass with constrained authorization and device profiling. This directly addresses the documented failure: A printer lacks an 802.1X supplicant but must join a restricted service network. For the Clearbrook University environment, the measurable success condition is: The known printer reaches only its required service while unknown MAC addresses remain restricted. This control targets the specific failure rather than merely changing an unrelated security setting.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Correct authentication method ordering and authorization fallback conditions. That action fits another problem: An organization has separate employee and guest policies but the switch incorrectly falls back to guest VLAN for every failed login. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Clearbrook University: A printer lacks an 802.1X supplicant but must join a restricted service network. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Use Cisco ISE MAC Authentication Bypass with constrained authorization and device profiling.

C:

Configure closed or appropriately restricted authentication behavior with an explicit fallback design. That action fits another problem: An access switch port allows unauthenticated clients onto a production VLAN when 802.1X fails. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Clearbrook University: A printer lacks an 802.1X supplicant but must join a restricted service network. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Use Cisco ISE MAC Authentication Bypass with constrained authorization and device profiling.

D:

Combine MAB with profiling, segmentation, and stronger identity controls where possible. That action fits another problem: An access policy grants privileged access based only on a claimed device MAC address. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Clearbrook University: A printer lacks an 802.1X supplicant but must join a restricted service network. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Use Cisco ISE MAC Authentication Bypass with constrained authorization and device profiling.

Question 1074

At Clearbrook University, a team reports that it corrected the following problem affecting campus connectivity and enrollment services: A printer lacks an 802.1X supplicant but must join a restricted service network. Which observation BEST verifies that the correction actually worked?

  1. Valid employees receive enterprise access and failed or guest sessions receive only restricted access.
  2. The known printer reaches only its required service while unknown MAC addresses remain restricted.
  3. A spoofed unknown endpoint cannot obtain privileged user-network resources.
  4. An unauthorized test device cannot enter the production VLAN after authentication failure.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The known printer reaches only its required service while unknown MAC addresses remain restricted. This is the decisive evidence for the original problem: A printer lacks an 802.1X supplicant but must join a restricted service network. It verifies that the intended corrective control—Use Cisco ISE MAC Authentication Bypass with constrained authorization and device profiling—works in the relevant environment; a completed change ticket alone would not prove the outcome at Clearbrook University.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Valid employees receive enterprise access and failed or guest sessions receive only restricted access. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: An organization has separate employee and guest policies but the switch incorrectly falls back to guest VLAN for every failed login, usually addressed by Correct authentication method ordering and authorization fallback conditions. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Clearbrook University was resolved. The specific required evidence is: The known printer reaches only its required service while unknown MAC addresses remain restricted.

C:

A spoofed unknown endpoint cannot obtain privileged user-network resources. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: An access policy grants privileged access based only on a claimed device MAC address, usually addressed by Combine MAB with profiling, segmentation, and stronger identity controls where possible. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Clearbrook University was resolved. The specific required evidence is: The known printer reaches only its required service while unknown MAC addresses remain restricted.

D:

An unauthorized test device cannot enter the production VLAN after authentication failure. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: An access switch port allows unauthenticated clients onto a production VLAN when 802.1X fails, usually addressed by Configure closed or appropriately restricted authentication behavior with an explicit fallback design. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Clearbrook University was resolved. The specific required evidence is: The known printer reaches only its required service while unknown MAC addresses remain restricted.

Question 1075

A security engineer at Northbridge University reviews academic systems and research access as part of a cross-team security policy review. The observed problem is: A printer lacks an 802.1X supplicant but must join a restricted service network. What is the BEST corrective action?

  1. Inspect ISE policy set conditions and the RADIUS authorization result delivered to the switch.
  2. Configure closed or appropriately restricted authentication behavior with an explicit fallback design.
  3. Update the network device AAA server configuration and confirm reachability and shared secret.
  4. Use Cisco ISE MAC Authentication Bypass with constrained authorization and device profiling.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Use Cisco ISE MAC Authentication Bypass with constrained authorization and device profiling. This directly addresses the documented failure: A printer lacks an 802.1X supplicant but must join a restricted service network. For the Northbridge University environment, the measurable success condition is: The known printer reaches only its required service while unknown MAC addresses remain restricted. This control targets the specific failure rather than merely changing an unrelated security setting.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Inspect ISE policy set conditions and the RADIUS authorization result delivered to the switch. That action fits another problem: An 802.1X laptop authenticates successfully but receives the wrong VLAN due to an authorization profile mismatch. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Northbridge University: A printer lacks an 802.1X supplicant but must join a restricted service network. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Use Cisco ISE MAC Authentication Bypass with constrained authorization and device profiling.

B:

Configure closed or appropriately restricted authentication behavior with an explicit fallback design. That action fits another problem: An access switch port allows unauthenticated clients onto a production VLAN when 802.1X fails. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Northbridge University: A printer lacks an 802.1X supplicant but must join a restricted service network. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Use Cisco ISE MAC Authentication Bypass with constrained authorization and device profiling.

C:

Update the network device AAA server configuration and confirm reachability and shared secret. That action fits another problem: The switch sends RADIUS to an old ISE address and all port authentication times out after a server migration. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Northbridge University: A printer lacks an 802.1X supplicant but must join a restricted service network. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Use Cisco ISE MAC Authentication Bypass with constrained authorization and device profiling.

Question 1076

During a cross-team security policy review at Northbridge University, engineers say that they resolved this finding: A printer lacks an 802.1X supplicant but must join a restricted service network. Which result provides the STRONGEST acceptance evidence?

  1. 802.1X requests reach the new ISE node and successful authentications are logged.
  2. The laptop receives its assigned VLAN and the policy hit is visible in ISE logs.
  3. An unauthorized test device cannot enter the production VLAN after authentication failure.
  4. The known printer reaches only its required service while unknown MAC addresses remain restricted.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

The known printer reaches only its required service while unknown MAC addresses remain restricted. This is the decisive evidence for the original problem: A printer lacks an 802.1X supplicant but must join a restricted service network. It verifies that the intended corrective control—Use Cisco ISE MAC Authentication Bypass with constrained authorization and device profiling—works in the relevant environment; a completed change ticket alone would not prove the outcome at Northbridge University.

Incorrect Answers

A:

802.1X requests reach the new ISE node and successful authentications are logged. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: The switch sends RADIUS to an old ISE address and all port authentication times out after a server migration, usually addressed by Update the network device AAA server configuration and confirm reachability and shared secret. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Northbridge University was resolved. The specific required evidence is: The known printer reaches only its required service while unknown MAC addresses remain restricted.

B:

The laptop receives its assigned VLAN and the policy hit is visible in ISE logs. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: An 802.1X laptop authenticates successfully but receives the wrong VLAN due to an authorization profile mismatch, usually addressed by Inspect ISE policy set conditions and the RADIUS authorization result delivered to the switch. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Northbridge University was resolved. The specific required evidence is: The known printer reaches only its required service while unknown MAC addresses remain restricted.

C:

An unauthorized test device cannot enter the production VLAN after authentication failure. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: An access switch port allows unauthenticated clients onto a production VLAN when 802.1X fails, usually addressed by Configure closed or appropriately restricted authentication behavior with an explicit fallback design. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Northbridge University was resolved. The specific required evidence is: The known printer reaches only its required service while unknown MAC addresses remain restricted.

Question 1077

At Bluewater Technology, during an application modernization project, the security team is examining cloud applications and security services. The finding is: An 802.1X laptop authenticates successfully but receives the wrong VLAN due to an authorization profile mismatch. Which action BEST addresses this specific security issue?

  1. Correct authentication method ordering and authorization fallback conditions.
  2. Configure closed or appropriately restricted authentication behavior with an explicit fallback design.
  3. Inspect ISE policy set conditions and the RADIUS authorization result delivered to the switch.
  4. Use Cisco ISE MAC Authentication Bypass with constrained authorization and device profiling.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Inspect ISE policy set conditions and the RADIUS authorization result delivered to the switch. This directly addresses the documented failure: An 802.1X laptop authenticates successfully but receives the wrong VLAN due to an authorization profile mismatch. For the Bluewater Technology environment, the measurable success condition is: The laptop receives its assigned VLAN and the policy hit is visible in ISE logs. This control targets the specific failure rather than merely changing an unrelated security setting.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Correct authentication method ordering and authorization fallback conditions. That action fits another problem: An organization has separate employee and guest policies but the switch incorrectly falls back to guest VLAN for every failed login. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Bluewater Technology: An 802.1X laptop authenticates successfully but receives the wrong VLAN due to an authorization profile mismatch. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Inspect ISE policy set conditions and the RADIUS authorization result delivered to the switch.

B:

Configure closed or appropriately restricted authentication behavior with an explicit fallback design. That action fits another problem: An access switch port allows unauthenticated clients onto a production VLAN when 802.1X fails. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Bluewater Technology: An 802.1X laptop authenticates successfully but receives the wrong VLAN due to an authorization profile mismatch. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Inspect ISE policy set conditions and the RADIUS authorization result delivered to the switch.

D:

Use Cisco ISE MAC Authentication Bypass with constrained authorization and device profiling. That action fits another problem: A printer lacks an 802.1X supplicant but must join a restricted service network. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Bluewater Technology: An 802.1X laptop authenticates successfully but receives the wrong VLAN due to an authorization profile mismatch. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Inspect ISE policy set conditions and the RADIUS authorization result delivered to the switch.

Question 1078

At Bluewater Technology, a team reports that it corrected the following problem affecting cloud applications and security services: An 802.1X laptop authenticates successfully but receives the wrong VLAN due to an authorization profile mismatch. Which observation BEST verifies that the correction actually worked?

  1. Valid employees receive enterprise access and failed or guest sessions receive only restricted access.
  2. The laptop receives its assigned VLAN and the policy hit is visible in ISE logs.
  3. An unauthorized test device cannot enter the production VLAN after authentication failure.
  4. The known printer reaches only its required service while unknown MAC addresses remain restricted.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The laptop receives its assigned VLAN and the policy hit is visible in ISE logs. This is the decisive evidence for the original problem: An 802.1X laptop authenticates successfully but receives the wrong VLAN due to an authorization profile mismatch. It verifies that the intended corrective control—Inspect ISE policy set conditions and the RADIUS authorization result delivered to the switch—works in the relevant environment; a completed change ticket alone would not prove the outcome at Bluewater Technology.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Valid employees receive enterprise access and failed or guest sessions receive only restricted access. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: An organization has separate employee and guest policies but the switch incorrectly falls back to guest VLAN for every failed login, usually addressed by Correct authentication method ordering and authorization fallback conditions. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Bluewater Technology was resolved. The specific required evidence is: The laptop receives its assigned VLAN and the policy hit is visible in ISE logs.

C:

An unauthorized test device cannot enter the production VLAN after authentication failure. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: An access switch port allows unauthenticated clients onto a production VLAN when 802.1X fails, usually addressed by Configure closed or appropriately restricted authentication behavior with an explicit fallback design. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Bluewater Technology was resolved. The specific required evidence is: The laptop receives its assigned VLAN and the policy hit is visible in ISE logs.

D:

The known printer reaches only its required service while unknown MAC addresses remain restricted. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: A printer lacks an 802.1X supplicant but must join a restricted service network, usually addressed by Use Cisco ISE MAC Authentication Bypass with constrained authorization and device profiling. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Bluewater Technology was resolved. The specific required evidence is: The laptop receives its assigned VLAN and the policy hit is visible in ISE logs.

Question 1079

A security engineer at Atlas Scientific reviews laboratory services and research storage as part of a privileged access assessment. The observed problem is: An 802.1X laptop authenticates successfully but receives the wrong VLAN due to an authorization profile mismatch. What is the BEST corrective action?

  1. Update the network device AAA server configuration and confirm reachability and shared secret.
  2. Inspect ISE policy set conditions and the RADIUS authorization result delivered to the switch.
  3. Use Cisco ISE MAC Authentication Bypass with constrained authorization and device profiling.
  4. Combine MAB with profiling, segmentation, and stronger identity controls where possible.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Inspect ISE policy set conditions and the RADIUS authorization result delivered to the switch. This directly addresses the documented failure: An 802.1X laptop authenticates successfully but receives the wrong VLAN due to an authorization profile mismatch. For the Atlas Scientific environment, the measurable success condition is: The laptop receives its assigned VLAN and the policy hit is visible in ISE logs. This control targets the specific failure rather than merely changing an unrelated security setting.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Update the network device AAA server configuration and confirm reachability and shared secret. That action fits another problem: The switch sends RADIUS to an old ISE address and all port authentication times out after a server migration. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Atlas Scientific: An 802.1X laptop authenticates successfully but receives the wrong VLAN due to an authorization profile mismatch. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Inspect ISE policy set conditions and the RADIUS authorization result delivered to the switch.

C:

Use Cisco ISE MAC Authentication Bypass with constrained authorization and device profiling. That action fits another problem: A printer lacks an 802.1X supplicant but must join a restricted service network. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Atlas Scientific: An 802.1X laptop authenticates successfully but receives the wrong VLAN due to an authorization profile mismatch. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Inspect ISE policy set conditions and the RADIUS authorization result delivered to the switch.

D:

Combine MAB with profiling, segmentation, and stronger identity controls where possible. That action fits another problem: An access policy grants privileged access based only on a claimed device MAC address. It does not directly remediate the current finding at Atlas Scientific: An 802.1X laptop authenticates successfully but receives the wrong VLAN due to an authorization profile mismatch. The relevant corrective control for this case is: Inspect ISE policy set conditions and the RADIUS authorization result delivered to the switch.

Question 1080

During a privileged access assessment at Atlas Scientific, engineers say that they resolved this finding: An 802.1X laptop authenticates successfully but receives the wrong VLAN due to an authorization profile mismatch. Which result provides the STRONGEST acceptance evidence?

  1. The known printer reaches only its required service while unknown MAC addresses remain restricted.
  2. The laptop receives its assigned VLAN and the policy hit is visible in ISE logs.
  3. 802.1X requests reach the new ISE node and successful authentications are logged.
  4. A spoofed unknown endpoint cannot obtain privileged user-network resources.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The laptop receives its assigned VLAN and the policy hit is visible in ISE logs. This is the decisive evidence for the original problem: An 802.1X laptop authenticates successfully but receives the wrong VLAN due to an authorization profile mismatch. It verifies that the intended corrective control—Inspect ISE policy set conditions and the RADIUS authorization result delivered to the switch—works in the relevant environment; a completed change ticket alone would not prove the outcome at Atlas Scientific.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The known printer reaches only its required service while unknown MAC addresses remain restricted. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: A printer lacks an 802.1X supplicant but must join a restricted service network, usually addressed by Use Cisco ISE MAC Authentication Bypass with constrained authorization and device profiling. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Atlas Scientific was resolved. The specific required evidence is: The laptop receives its assigned VLAN and the policy hit is visible in ISE logs.

C:

802.1X requests reach the new ISE node and successful authentications are logged. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: The switch sends RADIUS to an old ISE address and all port authentication times out after a server migration, usually addressed by Update the network device AAA server configuration and confirm reachability and shared secret. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Atlas Scientific was resolved. The specific required evidence is: The laptop receives its assigned VLAN and the policy hit is visible in ISE logs.

D:

A spoofed unknown endpoint cannot obtain privileged user-network resources. This would be relevant evidence for a different failure: An access policy grants privileged access based only on a claimed device MAC address, usually addressed by Combine MAB with profiling, segmentation, and stronger identity controls where possible. It does not demonstrate that the current problem at Atlas Scientific was resolved. The specific required evidence is: The laptop receives its assigned VLAN and the policy hit is visible in ISE logs.