McAfee-Secured Website

Exam Bundle

Exam Code: SC-401

Exam Name Administering Information Security in Microsoft 365

Certification Provider: Microsoft

Corresponding Certification: Microsoft Certified: Information Security Administrator Associate

Microsoft SC-401 Bundle $25.00
SC-401 Sample 1 SC-401 Sample 2 SC-401 Sample 3 SC-401 Sample 4 SC-401 Sample 5 SC-401 Sample 6 SC-401 Sample 7 SC-401 Sample 8 SC-401 Sample 9 SC-401 Sample 10

100% Microsoft SC-401 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real SC-401 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    SC-401 Questions & Answers

    291 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual SC-401 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • SC-401 Video Course

    SC-401 Video Course

    101 Video Lectures

    SC-401 Video Course is developed by Microsoft Professionals to help you pass the SC-401 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Administering Information Security in Microsoft 365 exam.

Administering Information Security in Microsoft 365 (SC-401) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $164.98
Bundle Price: $139.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    291 Questions

    $124.99
  • SC-401 Video Course

    Video Course

    101 Video Lectures

    $39.99

Microsoft SC-401 Practice Test 66

Question 650

The organization deployed this intervention: Investigate the DLP alert and relevant event evidence in the Microsoft Purview portal. For this scenario—A risk manager receives a DLP alert for external sharing of a confidential document.—which test is most relevant to acceptance?

  1. The file alert is linked to the specific matching file and policy action.
  2. The case records policy, workload, actor and action with appropriate disposition.
  3. The export and review actions appear in the case activity history.
  4. The case distinguishes a blocked attempt from a confirmed successful transfer.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The case records policy, workload, actor and action with appropriate disposition. This observation most directly verifies the designed intervention: Investigate the DLP alert and relevant event evidence in the Microsoft Purview portal. The requirement being evaluated here is: A risk manager receives a DLP alert for external sharing of a confidential document.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The file alert is linked to the specific matching file and policy action serves a different requirement. It does not resolve the specific issue addressed by the case records policy, workload, actor and action with appropriate disposition.

C:

The export and review actions appear in the case activity history. That evidence would matter for A compliance review finds a recurring unaddressed issue: An investigator needs an auditable record of exported eDiscovery results. Administrators must validate one relevant configuration change on test content. but the current implementation is Investigate the DLP alert and relevant event evidence in the Microsoft Purview portal. The requirement being evaluated here is: A risk manager receives a DLP alert for external sharing of a confidential document.

D:

The case distinguishes a blocked attempt from a confirmed successful transfer serves a different requirement. It does not resolve the specific issue addressed by the case records policy, workload, actor and action with appropriate disposition.

Question 651

Consider this Microsoft 365 security scenario: A second Microsoft 365 business unit reports the following protection gap: A risk manager receives a DLP alert for external sharing of a confidential document. It needs a configuration that can be tested without a tenant-wide change. Which administrative action is most appropriate?

  1. Examine supported DLP activity and override records in Microsoft Purview.
  2. Correlate Endpoint DLP event details with Activity explorer and available audit records.
  3. Investigate the DLP alert and relevant event evidence in the Microsoft Purview portal.
  4. Open the relevant Defender for Cloud Apps file policy alert and inspect scope and file sharing evidence.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Investigate the DLP alert and relevant event evidence in the Microsoft Purview portal. This is the targeted administrative control for the described requirement. The planned verification is: The case records policy, workload, actor and action with appropriate disposition. The requirement being evaluated here is: A second Microsoft 365 business unit reports the following protection gap: A risk manager receives a DLP alert for external sharing of a confidential document. It needs a configuration that can be tested without a tenant-wide change.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Examine supported DLP activity and override records in Microsoft Purview addresses a different classification need. It does not demonstrate the case records policy, workload, actor and action with appropriate disposition.

B:

Correlate Endpoint DLP event details with Activity explorer and available audit records does not demonstrate the classification result required here: the case records policy, workload, actor and action with appropriate disposition.

D:

Open the relevant Defender for Cloud Apps file policy alert and inspect scope and file sharing evidence addresses a different classification need. It does not demonstrate the case records policy, workload, actor and action with appropriate disposition.

Question 652

The requirement is: A second Microsoft 365 business unit reports the following protection gap: A risk manager receives a DLP alert for external sharing of a confidential document. It needs a configuration that can be tested without a tenant-wide change. The administrator implemented: Investigate the DLP alert and relevant event evidence in the Microsoft Purview portal. Which result would most directly verify success?

  1. The file alert is linked to the specific matching file and policy action.
  2. The case distinguishes a blocked attempt from a confirmed successful transfer.
  3. The export and review actions appear in the case activity history.
  4. The case records policy, workload, actor and action with appropriate disposition.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

The case records policy, workload, actor and action with appropriate disposition. This result tests the required outcome for the selected control rather than an unrelated security capability. The requirement being evaluated here is: A second Microsoft 365 business unit reports the following protection gap: A risk manager receives a DLP alert for external sharing of a confidential document. It needs a configuration that can be tested without a tenant-wide change.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The file alert is linked to the specific matching file and policy action. That evidence would matter for A security operations manager wants to connect cloud app file policy alerts to the affected data. but the current implementation is Investigate the DLP alert and relevant event evidence in the Microsoft Purview portal. The requirement being evaluated here is: A second Microsoft 365 business unit reports the following protection gap: A risk manager receives a DLP alert for external sharing of a confidential document. It needs a configuration that can be tested without a tenant-wide change.

B:

The case distinguishes a blocked attempt from a confirmed successful transfer serves a different requirement. It does not resolve the specific issue addressed by the case records policy, workload, actor and action with appropriate disposition.

C:

The export and review actions appear in the case activity history serves a different requirement. It does not resolve the specific issue addressed by the case records policy, workload, actor and action with appropriate disposition.

Question 653

A security team is reviewing the following situation: A SOC analyst receives a Purview-originated data security alert in the Defender XDR portal. What should the administrator implement?

  1. Use the integrated Defender XDR alert investigation workflow for the Purview signal.
  2. Open the relevant Defender for Cloud Apps file policy alert and inspect scope and file sharing evidence.
  3. Review Defender for Cloud Apps file alert details and supported file governance history.
  4. Investigate the DLP alert and relevant event evidence in the Microsoft Purview portal.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Use the integrated Defender XDR alert investigation workflow for the Purview signal. The intervention addresses the specific classification or security decision being asked. The controlled acceptance condition is: The security incident links to the related alert evidence without assuming a second independent detection. The requirement being evaluated here is: A SOC analyst receives a Purview-originated data security alert in the Defender XDR portal.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Open the relevant Defender for Cloud Apps file policy alert and inspect scope and file sharing evidence addresses a different classification need. It does not demonstrate the security incident links to the related alert evidence without assuming a second independent detection.

C:

Reviewing Defender for Cloud Apps file alert details and supported file governance history does not demonstrate the classification result required here: the security incident links to the related alert evidence without assuming a second independent detection.

D:

Investigate the DLP alert and relevant event evidence in the Microsoft Purview portal addresses a different data-protection mechanism. It does not provide the specific safeguard required here: use the integrated Defender XDR alert investigation workflow for the Purview signal.

Question 654

A security reviewer examines this implementation: Use the integrated Defender XDR alert investigation workflow for the Purview signal. It addresses: A SOC analyst receives a Purview-originated data security alert in the Defender XDR portal. Which evidence supports closure of the requirement?

  1. An escalation decision cites the actual activities and evidence.
  2. The security incident links to the related alert evidence without assuming a second independent detection.
  3. The investigation links the device operation to the affected labeled file.
  4. The file alert is linked to the specific matching file and policy action.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The security incident links to the related alert evidence without assuming a second independent detection. This is the scenario-specific success signal for implementing: Use the integrated Defender XDR alert investigation workflow for the Purview signal. The requirement being evaluated here is: A SOC analyst receives a Purview-originated data security alert in the Defender XDR portal.

Incorrect Answers

A:

An escalation decision cites the actual activities and evidence serves a different requirement. It does not resolve the specific issue addressed by the security incident links to the related alert evidence without assuming a second independent detection.

C:

The investigation links the device operation to the affected labeled file serves a different requirement. It does not resolve the specific issue addressed by the security incident links to the related alert evidence without assuming a second independent detection.

D:

The file alert is linked to the specific matching file and policy action serves a different requirement. It does not resolve the specific issue addressed by the security incident links to the related alert evidence without assuming a second independent detection.

Question 655

Which approach most directly meets the requirement in this Microsoft Purview scenario? A security controls assessment returns an unmet item: A SOC analyst receives a Purview-originated data security alert in the Defender XDR portal. A reviewer asks for the most direct supported remediation in the relevant Purview workload.

  1. Open the relevant Defender for Cloud Apps file policy alert and inspect scope and file sharing evidence.
  2. Review Defender for Cloud Apps file alert details and supported file governance history.
  3. Use the integrated Defender XDR alert investigation workflow for the Purview signal.
  4. Inspect the relevant Purview DLP alert and activity details for Teams.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Use the integrated Defender XDR alert investigation workflow for the Purview signal. Verify with this outcome: The security incident links to the related alert evidence without assuming a second independent detection.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Open the relevant Defender for Cloud Apps file policy alert and inspect scope and file sharing evidence does not demonstrate the classification result required here: the security incident links to the related alert evidence without assuming a second independent detection.

B:

Reviewing Defender for Cloud Apps file alert details and supported file governance history addresses a different data-protection mechanism. It does not provide the specific safeguard required here: use the integrated Defender XDR alert investigation workflow for the Purview signal.

D:

Inspecting the relevant Purview DLP alert and activity details for Teams does not demonstrate the classification result required here: the security incident links to the related alert evidence without assuming a second independent detection.

Question 656

The administrator applied this control: Use the integrated Defender XDR alert investigation workflow for the Purview signal. The requirement is: A security controls assessment returns an unmet item: A SOC analyst receives a Purview-originated data security alert in the Defender XDR portal. A reviewer asks for the most direct supported remediation in the relevant Purview workload. What outcome should the team verify?

  1. The investigation links the device operation to the affected labeled file.
  2. An escalation decision cites the actual activities and evidence.
  3. The file alert is linked to the specific matching file and policy action.
  4. The security incident links to the related alert evidence without assuming a second independent detection.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

The security incident links to the related alert evidence without assuming a second independent detection. This observation most directly verifies the designed intervention: Use the integrated Defender XDR alert investigation workflow for the Purview signal. The requirement being evaluated here is: A security controls assessment returns an unmet item: A SOC analyst receives a Purview-originated data security alert in the Defender XDR portal. A reviewer asks for the most direct supported remediation in the relevant Purview workload.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The investigation links the device operation to the affected labeled file serves a different requirement. It does not resolve the specific issue addressed by the security incident links to the related alert evidence without assuming a second independent detection.

B:

An escalation decision cites the actual activities and evidence serves a different requirement. It does not resolve the specific issue addressed by the security incident links to the related alert evidence without assuming a second independent detection.

C:

The file alert is linked to the specific matching file and policy action. That evidence would matter for A security operations manager wants to connect cloud app file policy alerts to the affected data. but the current implementation is Use the integrated Defender XDR alert investigation workflow for the Purview signal. The requirement being evaluated here is: A security controls assessment returns an unmet item: A SOC analyst receives a Purview-originated data security alert in the Defender XDR portal. A reviewer asks for the most direct supported remediation in the relevant Purview workload.

Question 657

The administrator must resolve the following protection gap: A Defender for Cloud Apps file policy alerts on sensitive content shared publicly. Which action is the best fit?

  1. Open the relevant Defender for Cloud Apps file policy alert and inspect scope and file sharing evidence.
  2. Use the integrated Defender XDR alert investigation workflow for the Purview signal.
  3. Investigate the DLP alert and relevant event evidence in the Microsoft Purview portal.
  4. Inspect the relevant Purview DLP alert and activity details for Teams.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Open the relevant Defender for Cloud Apps file policy alert and inspect scope and file sharing evidence. This is the targeted administrative control for the described requirement. The planned verification is: The investigation verifies whether the file was actually accessible externally. The requirement being evaluated here is: A Defender for Cloud Apps file policy alerts on sensitive content shared publicly.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Using the integrated Defender XDR alert investigation workflow for the Purview signal does not demonstrate the classification result required here: the investigation verifies whether the file was actually accessible externally.

C:

Investigate the DLP alert and relevant event evidence in the Microsoft Purview portal addresses a different data-protection mechanism. It does not provide the specific safeguard required here: open the relevant Defender for Cloud Apps file policy alert and inspect scope and file sharing evidence.

D:

Inspecting the relevant Purview DLP alert and activity details for Teams addresses a different classification need. It does not demonstrate the investigation verifies whether the file was actually accessible externally.

Question 658

The chosen administrative action is: Open the relevant Defender for Cloud Apps file policy alert and inspect scope and file sharing evidence. In the context of A Defender for Cloud Apps file policy alerts on sensitive content shared publicly. Which result constitutes the best validation?

  1. The investigation distinguishes unsupported events from a policy misconfiguration.
  2. The investigation verifies whether the file was actually accessible externally.
  3. The investigation links the device operation to the affected labeled file.
  4. The resulting investigation timeline contains only relevant activities and known limitations.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The investigation verifies whether the file was actually accessible externally. This result tests the required outcome for the selected control rather than an unrelated security capability. The requirement being evaluated here is: A Defender for Cloud Apps file policy alerts on sensitive content shared publicly.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The investigation distinguishes unsupported events from a policy misconfiguration. That evidence would matter for A second Microsoft 365 business unit reports the following protection gap: An administrator sees a missing audit event for a particular activity. It needs a configuration that can be tested without a tenant-wide change. but the current implementation is Open the relevant Defender for Cloud Apps file policy alert and inspect scope and file sharing evidence. The requirement being evaluated here is: A Defender for Cloud Apps file policy alerts on sensitive content shared publicly.

C:

The investigation links the device operation to the affected labeled file serves a different requirement. It does not resolve the specific issue addressed by the investigation verifies whether the file was actually accessible externally.

D:

The resulting investigation timeline contains only relevant activities and known limitations. That evidence would matter for A compliance investigator must search files by label and user activity rather than blindly scan every workload. but the current implementation is Open the relevant Defender for Cloud Apps file policy alert and inspect scope and file sharing evidence. The requirement being evaluated here is: A Defender for Cloud Apps file policy alerts on sensitive content shared publicly.

Question 659

A compliance review identifies this requirement: A risk committee asks an implementation team to address the following operational constraint: A Defender for Cloud Apps file policy alerts on sensitive content shared publicly. Results must be checked with controlled sample activity. Which implementation should be prioritized?

  1. Use the integrated Defender XDR alert investigation workflow for the Purview signal.
  2. Inspect the relevant Purview DLP alert and activity details for Teams.
  3. Open the relevant Defender for Cloud Apps file policy alert and inspect scope and file sharing evidence.
  4. Investigate the DLP alert and relevant event evidence in the Microsoft Purview portal.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Open the relevant Defender for Cloud Apps file policy alert and inspect scope and file sharing evidence. The intervention addresses the specific classification or security decision being asked. The controlled acceptance condition is: The investigation verifies whether the file was actually accessible externally. The requirement being evaluated here is: A risk committee asks an implementation team to address the following operational constraint: A Defender for Cloud Apps file policy alerts on sensitive content shared publicly. Results must be checked with controlled sample activity.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Using the integrated Defender XDR alert investigation workflow for the Purview signal addresses a different data-protection mechanism. It does not provide the specific safeguard required here: open the relevant Defender for Cloud Apps file policy alert and inspect scope and file sharing evidence.

B:

Inspecting the relevant Purview DLP alert and activity details for Teams addresses a different classification need. It does not demonstrate the investigation verifies whether the file was actually accessible externally.

D:

Investigate the DLP alert and relevant event evidence in the Microsoft Purview portal addresses a different data-protection mechanism. It does not provide the specific safeguard required here: open the relevant Defender for Cloud Apps file policy alert and inspect scope and file sharing evidence.

Question 660

A team selected the following control: Open the relevant Defender for Cloud Apps file policy alert and inspect scope and file sharing evidence. The business requirement is: A risk committee asks an implementation team to address the following operational constraint: A Defender for Cloud Apps file policy alerts on sensitive content shared publicly. Results must be checked with controlled sample activity. Which observation best validates the outcome?

  1. The investigation distinguishes unsupported events from a policy misconfiguration.
  2. The investigation links the device operation to the affected labeled file.
  3. The resulting investigation timeline contains only relevant activities and known limitations.
  4. The investigation verifies whether the file was actually accessible externally.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

The investigation verifies whether the file was actually accessible externally. This is the scenario-specific success signal for implementing: Open the relevant Defender for Cloud Apps file policy alert and inspect scope and file sharing evidence. The requirement being evaluated here is: A risk committee asks an implementation team to address the following operational constraint: A Defender for Cloud Apps file policy alerts on sensitive content shared publicly. Results must be checked with controlled sample activity.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The investigation distinguishes unsupported events from a policy misconfiguration serves a different requirement. It does not resolve the specific issue addressed by the investigation verifies whether the file was actually accessible externally.

B:

The investigation links the device operation to the affected labeled file. That evidence would matter for An internal audit requests technical evidence for this requirement: A data protection admin wants to see which labeled files a user copied to removable media. The owner authorizes a limited pilot before wider enforcement. but the current implementation is Open the relevant Defender for Cloud Apps file policy alert and inspect scope and file sharing evidence. The requirement being evaluated here is: A risk committee asks an implementation team to address the following operational constraint: A Defender for Cloud Apps file policy alerts on sensitive content shared publicly. Results must be checked with controlled sample activity.

C:

The resulting investigation timeline contains only relevant activities and known limitations serves a different requirement. It does not resolve the specific issue addressed by the investigation verifies whether the file was actually accessible externally.