Exam Bundle

This observation would validate a different case: An organization wants Windows Hello for Business sign-in with keys backed by device hardware rather than reusable passwords. It would check 'A test user completes protected biometric or PIN sign-in and reaches approved enterprise resources.' after 'Deploy Windows Hello for Business using appropriate Intune settings and supported authentication trust.'. It does not establish success for the stated scenario; the needed evidence is 'The protected app signs in with its applied policy while an unsupported client is denied.'.

This observation would validate a different case: An Intune compliance policy for Android expects a Windows-only setting and shows unknown evaluations. It would check 'Android pilot devices evaluate their supported controls without irrelevant Windows errors.' after 'Assign platform-specific compliance settings only to supported operating systems.'. It does not establish success for the stated scenario; the needed evidence is 'The protected app signs in with its applied policy while an unsupported client is denied.'.

This observation would validate a different case: A Windows LAPS password appears in directory but ordinary users can retrieve it due to overly broad role membership. It would check 'The ordinary user cannot retrieve the secret while an authorized operator can with logging.' after 'Restrict LAPS password retrieval permissions with approved RBAC and audit usage.'. It does not establish success for the stated scenario; the needed evidence is 'The protected app signs in with its applied policy while an unsupported client is denied.'.

This observation would validate a different case: A Windows Win32 app detection rule checks only a registry key that remains after uninstall, causing false positives. It would check 'A removed app shows not installed despite the leftover registry entry.' after 'Use a reliable detection strategy reflecting actual installed application state.'. It does not establish success for the stated scenario; the needed evidence is 'A supervised iPad installs the licensed app under corporate management.'.

This observation would validate a different case: A company must deploy a business app immediately after device enrollment but its required assignment waits on a group that is populated only hours later. It would check 'The app installs before the employee is allowed to start regulated work.' after 'Design enrollment-time group targeting or use a supported setup-stage deployment approach.'. It does not establish success for the stated scenario; the needed evidence is 'A supervised iPad installs the licensed app under corporate management.'.

This observation would validate a different case: An enterprise uses the new Microsoft Store for its Windows app distribution and still relies on retired legacy store integration. It would check 'The test Store application becomes available and installs from its current source.' after 'Choose the supported Microsoft Store app deployment method within Intune.'. It does not establish success for the stated scenario; the needed evidence is 'A supervised iPad installs the licensed app under corporate management.'.

This observation would validate a different case: A reporting dashboard displays the last update scan rather than actual installation date and leaders incorrectly mark patching complete. It would check 'The exported report identifies installed builds and outstanding restarts separately.' after 'Distinguish scan, offer, download, install and reboot stages in update reports.'. It does not establish success for the stated scenario; the needed evidence is 'A pilot device appears in the expected Autopatch report and follows its deployment schedule.'.

This observation would validate a different case: A business needs to hold devices on Windows 11 24H2 while still receiving monthly security fixes. It would check 'Pilot endpoints retain the selected release and apply recent security fixes.' after 'Use a feature update policy targeting the approved Windows version alongside normal quality updates.'. It does not establish success for the stated scenario; the needed evidence is 'A pilot device appears in the expected Autopatch report and follows its deployment schedule.'.

This observation would validate a different case: A fleet of Samsung Android corporate devices needs firmware updates but the ordinary app update policy changes only application packages. It would check 'The pilot Samsung device reports the intended firmware build after its FOTA policy.' after 'Plan supported Android OEM firmware-over-the-air (FOTA) deployment or configuration restrictions.'. It does not establish success for the stated scenario; the needed evidence is 'A pilot device appears in the expected Autopatch report and follows its deployment schedule.'.

This action is appropriate for a different case: A customer wants only a specific device support group to be local Administrators on Windows endpoints, not every cloud user. There, the targeted fix is 'Configure the Windows local users and groups policy in Intune with supported membership settings.' because local administrative membership needs explicit managed authorization. The current scenario instead requires 'Configure separation of duty in multi-admin approval and audit the approval chain.' and verification that the requester cannot self-approve and a second authorized approver is recorded.

This action is appropriate for a different case: Two subsidiaries use one Intune tenant and regional operators must not see each other's device records. There, the targeted fix is 'Configure Intune scope tags and appropriate role scope group assignments.' because scoped administration can restrict what assigned administrators can see or change. The current scenario instead requires 'Configure separation of duty in multi-admin approval and audit the approval chain.' and verification that the requester cannot self-approve and a second authorized approver is recorded.

This action is appropriate for a different case: A compliance check requires BitLocker but a freshly enrolled Windows device has not finished encryption. There, the targeted fix is 'Configure appropriate grace period and evaluate encryption deployment state before enforcing device access.' because a compliance deadline should account for permitted remediation timing. The current scenario instead requires 'Configure separation of duty in multi-admin approval and audit the approval chain.' and verification that the requester cannot self-approve and a second authorized approver is recorded.

This observation would validate a different case: A user complains that an optional productivity tool installs on every corporate phone without consent. It would check 'The pilot user chooses whether to install the optional app from the approved portal.' after 'Change the Intune app assignment from Required to Available where appropriate.'. It does not establish success for the stated scenario; the needed evidence is 'The test endpoint has only the approved current app version.'.

This observation would validate a different case: A packaged enterprise app supports both 32-bit and 64-bit installations, but the wrong architecture is installed on ARM-based devices. It would check 'Each test device receives a compatible binary and unsupported versions are excluded.' after 'Define valid architecture applicability or separate packages according to supported platform.'. It does not establish success for the stated scenario; the needed evidence is 'The test endpoint has only the approved current app version.'.

This observation would validate a different case: A packaged Win32 application uses a shared UNC path installer that remote laptops cannot reach off VPN. It would check 'The app installs over approved internet connectivity without a corporate VPN share.' after 'Distribute packaged installation content through Intune rather than relying on an inaccessible internal share.'. It does not establish success for the stated scenario; the needed evidence is 'The test endpoint has only the approved current app version.'.

This action is appropriate for a different case: An organization plans update ring rollout with no emergency rollback method for a faulty driver included in a release. There, the targeted fix is 'Define staged update deployment with supported pause, rollback or remediation processes.' because release control needs an incident path for compatibility regressions. The current scenario instead requires 'Plan supported Android OEM firmware-over-the-air (FOTA) deployment or configuration restrictions.' and verification that the pilot Samsung device reports the intended firmware build after its FOTA policy.

This action is appropriate for a different case: Mac laptops should install a new macOS patch outside peak business hours while preserving user notice. There, the targeted fix is 'Deploy supported macOS software update policy through the Intune Settings Catalog.' because managed macOS updates can be staged by compatible OS/device prerequisites. The current scenario instead requires 'Plan supported Android OEM firmware-over-the-air (FOTA) deployment or configuration restrictions.' and verification that the pilot Samsung device reports the intended firmware build after its FOTA policy.

This action is appropriate for a different case: An Intune report says an update was assigned but users claim it is installed; the team has no deployment status evidence. There, the targeted fix is 'Review Windows update deployment and per-device installation reports, including pending restart state.' because assignment alone does not confirm an update completed successfully. The current scenario instead requires 'Plan supported Android OEM firmware-over-the-air (FOTA) deployment or configuration restrictions.' and verification that the pilot Samsung device reports the intended firmware build after its FOTA policy.

This observation would validate a different case: A developer queries device identities through Microsoft Graph and mistakes the Entra device ID for the Intune managedDevice ID. It would check 'The query resolves to the intended physical device without accidentally acting on another inventory record.' after 'Map the appropriate identity identifiers and relationships before issuing device-specific API actions.'. It does not establish success for the stated scenario; the needed evidence is 'The device registers for work access without appearing as a fully corporate-managed endpoint.'.

This observation would validate a different case: A shared meeting-room Windows device should not be associated with an individual employee for sign-in identity and assignment. It would check 'A test shared device is enrolled under the approved ownership workflow without a permanent user affinity.' after 'Plan an organization-owned shared device enrollment and appropriate Entra device identity.'. It does not establish success for the stated scenario; the needed evidence is 'The device registers for work access without appearing as a fully corporate-managed endpoint.'.

This observation would validate a different case: A branch requires traditional on-premises domain authentication for line-of-business software while also using cloud-based identity policies. It would check 'The Windows device reports both domain join and hybrid Entra registration after synchronization.' after 'Plan Microsoft Entra hybrid join with synchronized identity and valid domain connectivity.'. It does not establish success for the stated scenario; the needed evidence is 'The device registers for work access without appearing as a fully corporate-managed endpoint.'.

This observation would validate a different case: A compliance team wants device diagnostics from a stolen laptop but the device has been offline for weeks. It would check 'The case notes pending or failed diagnostic collection instead of inventing a fresh log.' after 'Report remote collection status accurately and use available last-seen telemetry rather than claiming successful capture.'. It does not establish success for the stated scenario; the needed evidence is 'The support case includes post-upgrade logs tied to the affected profile ID.'.

This observation would validate a different case: Hundreds of managed devices need a common remote restart after a validated firmware change. It would check 'The intended cohort restarts and unaffected device records show no remote action.' after 'Use supported Intune bulk remote action with carefully verified group/device selection.'. It does not establish success for the stated scenario; the needed evidence is 'The support case includes post-upgrade logs tied to the affected profile ID.'.

This observation would validate a different case: A support agent cannot tell why a single user's two iPhones receive different configuration policies. It would check 'The resulting report shows the effective assignment and exclusion causing the difference.' after 'Use the Intune user-focused Troubleshooting blade to inspect policies and assignments.'. It does not establish success for the stated scenario; the needed evidence is 'The support case includes post-upgrade logs tied to the affected profile ID.'.

This action is appropriate for a different case: A line-of-business app uses a dependency installer that requires a reboot before the main install can work. There, the targeted fix is 'Configure appropriate Intune dependency and restart handling for both packages.' because an incomplete reboot can leave prerequisite components unavailable. The current scenario instead requires 'Use a tailored Office Deployment Tool configuration or Intune suite profile for required components.' and verification that the pilot receives only the selected applications and languages.

This action is appropriate for a different case: An enterprise uses the new Microsoft Store for its Windows app distribution and still relies on retired legacy store integration. There, the targeted fix is 'Choose the supported Microsoft Store app deployment method within Intune.' because modern store integration replaces older Microsoft Store for Business workflows. The current scenario instead requires 'Use a tailored Office Deployment Tool configuration or Intune suite profile for required components.' and verification that the pilot receives only the selected applications and languages.

This action is appropriate for a different case: A business application requires an older runtime library that is missing on new Windows endpoints. There, the targeted fix is 'Configure the prerequisite runtime as an Intune Win32 app dependency.' because dependency relationships ensure necessary software is installed before the dependent app. The current scenario instead requires 'Use a tailored Office Deployment Tool configuration or Intune suite profile for required components.' and verification that the pilot receives only the selected applications and languages.

This action is appropriate for a different case: A tenant has four months of Intune compliance history but executives want trend reporting without manually copying screenshots. There, the targeted fix is 'Use Intune reporting exports or supported Graph reporting endpoints and create a governed dashboard.' because historical trend analysis requires repeatable, appropriately scoped data extraction. The current scenario instead requires 'Deploy a supported Intune Remediations detection script plus narrowly scoped corrective script.' and verification that the detection identifies a failed test condition and remediation restores expected state.

This action is appropriate for a different case: A company must track enrollment failures by platform and technician across branches to find a repeating setup problem. There, the targeted fix is 'Create scoped enrollment failure reports with platform, profile and error details.' because enrollment analytics help distinguish systemic failures from isolated user mistakes. The current scenario instead requires 'Deploy a supported Intune Remediations detection script plus narrowly scoped corrective script.' and verification that the detection identifies a failed test condition and remediation restores expected state.

This action is appropriate for a different case: An operations team wants automated notifications when a previously compliant device becomes noncompliant, not weekly manual spreadsheet checks. There, the targeted fix is 'Configure supported Intune alerts and notifications or approved report-driven monitoring for compliance drift.' because timely alerting reduces time to investigate deterioration in endpoint posture. The current scenario instead requires 'Deploy a supported Intune Remediations detection script plus narrowly scoped corrective script.' and verification that the detection identifies a failed test condition and remediation restores expected state.

This observation would validate a different case: A new Teams app version is installed, but app protection appears inactive because a stale user account is signed in. It would check 'Switching to the targeted work account activates the intended data protection controls.' after 'Check which organizational identity and supported app instance is receiving the policy.'. It does not establish success for the stated scenario; the needed evidence is 'The protected app removes corporate documents but the user's personal content remains.'.

This observation would validate a different case: An IT team wants to report whether mobile app protection was applied without inferring success from app installation alone. It would check 'The report identifies an applied policy for eligible users and flags an unprotected account.' after 'Use Intune app protection status reporting for the targeted managed account.'. It does not establish success for the stated scenario; the needed evidence is 'The protected app removes corporate documents but the user's personal content remains.'.

This observation would validate a different case: A managed Android app receives a configuration key from a public email rather than through controlled policy. It would check 'The app reads its approved endpoint and tenant options without exposing them in user emails.' after 'Create an Intune app configuration policy using supported managed app configuration settings.'. It does not establish success for the stated scenario; the needed evidence is 'The protected app removes corporate documents but the user's personal content remains.'.