Question 570
A service delivery discussion covering travel and workforce systems at an airline identifies this gap: A change approval waits for the same executive committee regardless of trivial or high-risk scope. Which outcome would BEST demonstrate that the targeted response has worked?
Explanation
Correct Answer
For travel and workforce systems at an airline, low-risk changes receive proportionate handling while significant risks remain accountable. In this scenario, appropriate change authority matters because A change approval waits for the same executive committee regardless of trivial or high-risk scope. The corresponding action is: Assign authorization to the change authority suitable for the type and risk of change; the evidence checks the specific gap rather than simply reporting activity.
Incorrect Answers
“Approval evidence describes risk and controls proportionate to the service exposure” relates to change risk assessment, not the requirement described here. The required response or evidence is: Low-risk changes receive proportionate handling while significant risks remain accountable.
“The request record identifies the eligible requester and approved fulfilment” relates to user as requester, not the requirement described here. The required response or evidence is: Low-risk changes receive proportionate handling while significant risks remain accountable.
“The ticket has a responsible owner and tracked progress until restoration” relates to incident ownership, not the requirement described here. The required response or evidence is: Low-risk changes receive proportionate handling while significant risks remain accountable.