McAfee-Secured Website

Exam Bundle

Exam Code: HPE7-A08

Exam Name HPE Network Switching Professional

Certification Provider: HP

Corresponding Certification: HPE Aruba Networking Certified Professional - Switching

HP HPE7-A08 Bundle $19.99

100% HP HPE7-A08 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real HPE7-A08 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    HPE7-A08 Questions & Answers

    172 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual HPE7-A08 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • Study Guide

    HPE7-A08 Study Guide

    794 PDF Pages

    Developed by industry experts, this 794-page guide spells out in painstaking detail all of the information you need to ace HPE7-A08 exam.

HPE Network Switching Professional (HPE7-A08) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $154.98
Bundle Price: $134.99

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    172 Questions

    $124.99
  • Study Guide

    Study Guide

    794 PDF Pages

    $29.99

HP HPE7-A08 Practice Test 54

Question 530

At Pine Valley Telecom, the provider infrastructure team is preparing a regional hub modernization. The operational constraint is planned fault-domain isolation. A production-readiness reviewer asks for proof addressing: An LACP group has four configured members but only two report collecting and distributing. Which result BEST demonstrates that this specific issue was resolved?

  1. The expected receiver group remains present across query intervals and the stream is delivered.
  2. A test trap arrives at the intended collector with correct source and severity handling.
  3. All intended members report synchronized forwarding and aggregate utilization follows expected paths.
  4. The identified environmental or link problem is addressed and timed flap alarms cease.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

All intended members report synchronized forwarding and aggregate utilization follows expected paths. This is the relevant acceptance observation for the reported issue: An LACP group has four configured members but only two report collecting and distributing. The intended corrective choice is: Inspect LACP partner state, compatible keys and bundle parameters for the inactive members. At Pine Valley Telecom, this outcome verifies actual operation under planned fault-domain isolation, rather than only a ticket marked complete.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The expected receiver group remains present across query intervals and the stream is delivered. Such an observation would verify a separate issue: Multicast members disappear and video freezes while unicast traffic continues normally. It would follow the distinct action: Inspect IGMP snooping tables, querier state and group aging alongside traffic counters. Here the reported failure is An LACP group has four configured members but only two report collecting and distributing. The decisive result for Pine Valley Telecom must instead be: All intended members report synchronized forwarding and aggregate utilization follows expected paths.

B:

A test trap arrives at the intended collector with correct source and severity handling. Such an observation would verify a separate issue: A service-impacting event is absent from the monitoring platform although the switch generated an SNMP trap. It would follow the distinct action: Validate trap destination, version/authentication, ACL and monitoring collector reachability. Here the reported failure is An LACP group has four configured members but only two report collecting and distributing. The decisive result for Pine Valley Telecom must instead be: All intended members report synchronized forwarding and aggregate utilization follows expected paths.

D:

The identified environmental or link problem is addressed and timed flap alarms cease. Such an observation would verify a separate issue: Logs repeatedly report interface flap events at the same hour when janitorial equipment is powered. It would follow the distinct action: Correlate timestamped switch syslog, power events and physical link counters before concluding the root cause. Here the reported failure is An LACP group has four configured members but only two report collecting and distributing. The decisive result for Pine Valley Telecom must instead be: All intended members report synchronized forwarding and aggregate utilization follows expected paths.

Question 531

At Fairmont Logistics, the distribution-center switching team is preparing a warehouse device rollout. The operational constraint is critical handheld scanner uptime. The network investigation identifies this condition: An LACP group has four configured members but only two report collecting and distributing. Which action BEST corrects the stated problem?

  1. Inspect physical-layer, optic and peer state rather than treating it as an administrative shutdown.
  2. Inspect IGMP snooping tables, querier state and group aging alongside traffic counters.
  3. Inspect LACP partner state, compatible keys and bundle parameters for the inactive members.
  4. Check hello reception, network parameters, neighbor consistency and any one-way reachability.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Inspect LACP partner state, compatible keys and bundle parameters for the inactive members. This response directly addresses the observed condition: An LACP group has four configured members but only two report collecting and distributing. For Fairmont Logistics during a warehouse device rollout, the decisive check is not merely that a configuration was entered: All intended members report synchronized forwarding and aggregate utilization follows expected paths. That evidence connects the proposed correction to measurable forwarding or management behavior.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Inspect physical-layer, optic and peer state rather than treating it as an administrative shutdown. That relates to a different fault: An interface displays operationally down while its administrative setting is up, and counters show no carrier. The incident in the scenario is instead: An LACP group has four configured members but only two report collecting and distributing. Changing the unrelated setting does not establish the required repair at Fairmont Logistics; the relevant confirmation would be: All intended members report synchronized forwarding and aggregate utilization follows expected paths.

B:

Inspect IGMP snooping tables, querier state and group aging alongside traffic counters. That relates to a different fault: Multicast members disappear and video freezes while unicast traffic continues normally. The incident in the scenario is instead: An LACP group has four configured members but only two report collecting and distributing. Changing the unrelated setting does not establish the required repair at Fairmont Logistics; the relevant confirmation would be: All intended members report synchronized forwarding and aggregate utilization follows expected paths.

D:

Check hello reception, network parameters, neighbor consistency and any one-way reachability. That relates to a different fault: An OSPF interface is physically up but the neighbor remains in Init rather than reaching full adjacency. The incident in the scenario is instead: An LACP group has four configured members but only two report collecting and distributing. Changing the unrelated setting does not establish the required repair at Fairmont Logistics; the relevant confirmation would be: All intended members report synchronized forwarding and aggregate utilization follows expected paths.

Question 532

At Fairmont Logistics, the distribution-center switching team is preparing a warehouse device rollout. The operational constraint is critical handheld scanner uptime. The owner reports that the correction is complete for this issue: An LACP group has four configured members but only two report collecting and distributing. Which result BEST demonstrates that this specific issue was resolved?

  1. The expected receiver group remains present across query intervals and the stream is delivered.
  2. A root cause is documented from timestamped route and interface events despite high device uptime.
  3. Topology-change counters stabilize and the intended root remains consistent.
  4. All intended members report synchronized forwarding and aggregate utilization follows expected paths.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

All intended members report synchronized forwarding and aggregate utilization follows expected paths. This is the relevant acceptance observation for the reported issue: An LACP group has four configured members but only two report collecting and distributing. The intended corrective choice is: Inspect LACP partner state, compatible keys and bundle parameters for the inactive members. At Fairmont Logistics, this outcome verifies actual operation under critical handheld scanner uptime, rather than only a ticket marked complete.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The expected receiver group remains present across query intervals and the stream is delivered. Such an observation would verify a separate issue: Multicast members disappear and video freezes while unicast traffic continues normally. It would follow the distinct action: Inspect IGMP snooping tables, querier state and group aging alongside traffic counters. Here the reported failure is An LACP group has four configured members but only two report collecting and distributing. The decisive result for Fairmont Logistics must instead be: All intended members report synchronized forwarding and aggregate utilization follows expected paths.

B:

A root cause is documented from timestamped route and interface events despite high device uptime. Such an observation would verify a separate issue: A core switch has been continuously up for months but its route-flap alarms spiked overnight. It would follow the distinct action: Review operational stability across routing, interfaces and change logs rather than using uptime as proof of health. Here the reported failure is An LACP group has four configured members but only two report collecting and distributing. The decisive result for Fairmont Logistics must instead be: All intended members report synchronized forwarding and aggregate utilization follows expected paths.

C:

Topology-change counters stabilize and the intended root remains consistent. Such an observation would verify a separate issue: STP logs show repeated topology-change notifications after a new edge connection. It would follow the distinct action: Correlate root-port transitions, BPDU events and edge-port behavior to identify unexpected topology changes. Here the reported failure is An LACP group has four configured members but only two report collecting and distributing. The decisive result for Fairmont Logistics must instead be: All intended members report synchronized forwarding and aggregate utilization follows expected paths.

Question 533

At Juniper Hospitality, the guest-services engineering group is preparing a high-season network readiness test. The operational constraint is guest access isolated from employee services. The site acceptance review finds: STP logs show repeated topology-change notifications after a new edge connection. Which action BEST corrects the stated problem?

  1. Correlate root-port transitions, BPDU events and edge-port behavior to identify unexpected topology changes.
  2. Compare memory, process and software-version telemetry with the prechange baseline and known defect guidance.
  3. Inspect LACP partner state, compatible keys and bundle parameters for the inactive members.
  4. Interpret PoE allocation, supply and per-port power class telemetry independently from link state.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Correlate root-port transitions, BPDU events and edge-port behavior to identify unexpected topology changes. This response directly addresses the observed condition: STP logs show repeated topology-change notifications after a new edge connection. For Juniper Hospitality during a high-season network readiness test, the decisive check is not merely that a configuration was entered: Topology-change counters stabilize and the intended root remains consistent. That evidence connects the proposed correction to measurable forwarding or management behavior.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Compare memory, process and software-version telemetry with the prechange baseline and known defect guidance. That relates to a different fault: Switch memory utilization climbs after a firmware update and the team ignores software health statistics. The incident in the scenario is instead: STP logs show repeated topology-change notifications after a new edge connection. Changing the unrelated setting does not establish the required repair at Juniper Hospitality; the relevant confirmation would be: Topology-change counters stabilize and the intended root remains consistent.

C:

Inspect LACP partner state, compatible keys and bundle parameters for the inactive members. That relates to a different fault: An LACP group has four configured members but only two report collecting and distributing. The incident in the scenario is instead: STP logs show repeated topology-change notifications after a new edge connection. Changing the unrelated setting does not establish the required repair at Juniper Hospitality; the relevant confirmation would be: Topology-change counters stabilize and the intended root remains consistent.

D:

Interpret PoE allocation, supply and per-port power class telemetry independently from link state. That relates to a different fault: PoE output reports repeated deny events although interface link counters look normal. The incident in the scenario is instead: STP logs show repeated topology-change notifications after a new edge connection. Changing the unrelated setting does not establish the required repair at Juniper Hospitality; the relevant confirmation would be: Topology-change counters stabilize and the intended root remains consistent.

Question 534

At Juniper Hospitality, the guest-services engineering group is preparing a high-season network readiness test. The operational constraint is guest access isolated from employee services. A production-readiness reviewer asks for proof addressing: STP logs show repeated topology-change notifications after a new edge connection. Which result BEST demonstrates that this specific issue was resolved?

  1. Queue and utilization measurements identify the overloaded egress class and improve after capacity or policy change.
  2. Topology-change counters stabilize and the intended root remains consistent.
  3. The expected receiver group remains present across query intervals and the stream is delivered.
  4. All intended members report synchronized forwarding and aggregate utilization follows expected paths.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Topology-change counters stabilize and the intended root remains consistent. This is the relevant acceptance observation for the reported issue: STP logs show repeated topology-change notifications after a new edge connection. The intended corrective choice is: Correlate root-port transitions, BPDU events and edge-port behavior to identify unexpected topology changes. At Juniper Hospitality, this outcome verifies actual operation under guest access isolated from employee services, rather than only a ticket marked complete.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Queue and utilization measurements identify the overloaded egress class and improve after capacity or policy change. Such an observation would verify a separate issue: A port reports thousands of egress discards with low CRC errors during scheduled replication. It would follow the distinct action: Interpret output-queue congestion rather than diagnosing an optical fault from discards alone. Here the reported failure is STP logs show repeated topology-change notifications after a new edge connection. The decisive result for Juniper Hospitality must instead be: Topology-change counters stabilize and the intended root remains consistent.

C:

The expected receiver group remains present across query intervals and the stream is delivered. Such an observation would verify a separate issue: Multicast members disappear and video freezes while unicast traffic continues normally. It would follow the distinct action: Inspect IGMP snooping tables, querier state and group aging alongside traffic counters. Here the reported failure is STP logs show repeated topology-change notifications after a new edge connection. The decisive result for Juniper Hospitality must instead be: Topology-change counters stabilize and the intended root remains consistent.

D:

All intended members report synchronized forwarding and aggregate utilization follows expected paths. Such an observation would verify a separate issue: An LACP group has four configured members but only two report collecting and distributing. It would follow the distinct action: Inspect LACP partner state, compatible keys and bundle parameters for the inactive members. Here the reported failure is STP logs show repeated topology-change notifications after a new edge connection. The decisive result for Juniper Hospitality must instead be: Topology-change counters stabilize and the intended root remains consistent.

Question 535

At Timberline Foods, the supply-chain access network team is preparing a facility rollout. The operational constraint is defined service-level measurements. The network investigation identifies this condition: STP logs show repeated topology-change notifications after a new edge connection. Which action BEST corrects the stated problem?

  1. Inspect physical-layer, optic and peer state rather than treating it as an administrative shutdown.
  2. Correlate root-port transitions, BPDU events and edge-port behavior to identify unexpected topology changes.
  3. Use supported time-series telemetry or Network Analytics Engine monitoring agents with appropriate thresholds.
  4. Review operational stability across routing, interfaces and change logs rather than using uptime as proof of health.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Correlate root-port transitions, BPDU events and edge-port behavior to identify unexpected topology changes. This response directly addresses the observed condition: STP logs show repeated topology-change notifications after a new edge connection. For Timberline Foods during a facility rollout, the decisive check is not merely that a configuration was entered: Topology-change counters stabilize and the intended root remains consistent. That evidence connects the proposed correction to measurable forwarding or management behavior.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Inspect physical-layer, optic and peer state rather than treating it as an administrative shutdown. That relates to a different fault: An interface displays operationally down while its administrative setting is up, and counters show no carrier. The incident in the scenario is instead: STP logs show repeated topology-change notifications after a new edge connection. Changing the unrelated setting does not establish the required repair at Timberline Foods; the relevant confirmation would be: Topology-change counters stabilize and the intended root remains consistent.

C:

Use supported time-series telemetry or Network Analytics Engine monitoring agents with appropriate thresholds. That relates to a different fault: Operators want to detect recurring CPU spikes but only collect daily snapshots. The incident in the scenario is instead: STP logs show repeated topology-change notifications after a new edge connection. Changing the unrelated setting does not establish the required repair at Timberline Foods; the relevant confirmation would be: Topology-change counters stabilize and the intended root remains consistent.

D:

Review operational stability across routing, interfaces and change logs rather than using uptime as proof of health. That relates to a different fault: A core switch has been continuously up for months but its route-flap alarms spiked overnight. The incident in the scenario is instead: STP logs show repeated topology-change notifications after a new edge connection. Changing the unrelated setting does not establish the required repair at Timberline Foods; the relevant confirmation would be: Topology-change counters stabilize and the intended root remains consistent.

Question 536

At Timberline Foods, the supply-chain access network team is preparing a facility rollout. The operational constraint is defined service-level measurements. The owner reports that the correction is complete for this issue: STP logs show repeated topology-change notifications after a new edge connection. Which result BEST demonstrates that this specific issue was resolved?

  1. A test trap arrives at the intended collector with correct source and severity handling.
  2. The expected receiver group remains present across query intervals and the stream is delivered.
  3. Topology-change counters stabilize and the intended root remains consistent.
  4. Memory use stabilizes after verified remediation and no longer threatens availability.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Topology-change counters stabilize and the intended root remains consistent. This is the relevant acceptance observation for the reported issue: STP logs show repeated topology-change notifications after a new edge connection. The intended corrective choice is: Correlate root-port transitions, BPDU events and edge-port behavior to identify unexpected topology changes. At Timberline Foods, this outcome verifies actual operation under defined service-level measurements, rather than only a ticket marked complete.

Incorrect Answers

A:

A test trap arrives at the intended collector with correct source and severity handling. Such an observation would verify a separate issue: A service-impacting event is absent from the monitoring platform although the switch generated an SNMP trap. It would follow the distinct action: Validate trap destination, version/authentication, ACL and monitoring collector reachability. Here the reported failure is STP logs show repeated topology-change notifications after a new edge connection. The decisive result for Timberline Foods must instead be: Topology-change counters stabilize and the intended root remains consistent.

B:

The expected receiver group remains present across query intervals and the stream is delivered. Such an observation would verify a separate issue: Multicast members disappear and video freezes while unicast traffic continues normally. It would follow the distinct action: Inspect IGMP snooping tables, querier state and group aging alongside traffic counters. Here the reported failure is STP logs show repeated topology-change notifications after a new edge connection. The decisive result for Timberline Foods must instead be: Topology-change counters stabilize and the intended root remains consistent.

D:

Memory use stabilizes after verified remediation and no longer threatens availability. Such an observation would verify a separate issue: Switch memory utilization climbs after a firmware update and the team ignores software health statistics. It would follow the distinct action: Compare memory, process and software-version telemetry with the prechange baseline and known defect guidance. Here the reported failure is STP logs show repeated topology-change notifications after a new edge connection. The decisive result for Timberline Foods must instead be: Topology-change counters stabilize and the intended root remains consistent.

Question 537

At Dunhaven University, the campus systems team is preparing a multi-building classroom network upgrade. The operational constraint is classroom Wi-Fi and VoIP availability. The site acceptance review finds: A VSX peer dashboard shows one chassis healthy while the inter-switch link status is failed. Which action BEST corrects the stated problem?

  1. Inspect physical-layer, optic and peer state rather than treating it as an administrative shutdown.
  2. Distinguish VSX peer, ISL and keepalive states and apply the documented failover troubleshooting path.
  3. Interpret PoE allocation, supply and per-port power class telemetry independently from link state.
  4. Inspect LACP partner state, compatible keys and bundle parameters for the inactive members.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Distinguish VSX peer, ISL and keepalive states and apply the documented failover troubleshooting path. This response directly addresses the observed condition: A VSX peer dashboard shows one chassis healthy while the inter-switch link status is failed. For Dunhaven University during a multi-building classroom network upgrade, the decisive check is not merely that a configuration was entered: Operational checks show coherent VSX roles with restored ISL and keepalive health. That evidence connects the proposed correction to measurable forwarding or management behavior.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Inspect physical-layer, optic and peer state rather than treating it as an administrative shutdown. That relates to a different fault: An interface displays operationally down while its administrative setting is up, and counters show no carrier. The incident in the scenario is instead: A VSX peer dashboard shows one chassis healthy while the inter-switch link status is failed. Changing the unrelated setting does not establish the required repair at Dunhaven University; the relevant confirmation would be: Operational checks show coherent VSX roles with restored ISL and keepalive health.

C:

Interpret PoE allocation, supply and per-port power class telemetry independently from link state. That relates to a different fault: PoE output reports repeated deny events although interface link counters look normal. The incident in the scenario is instead: A VSX peer dashboard shows one chassis healthy while the inter-switch link status is failed. Changing the unrelated setting does not establish the required repair at Dunhaven University; the relevant confirmation would be: Operational checks show coherent VSX roles with restored ISL and keepalive health.

D:

Inspect LACP partner state, compatible keys and bundle parameters for the inactive members. That relates to a different fault: An LACP group has four configured members but only two report collecting and distributing. The incident in the scenario is instead: A VSX peer dashboard shows one chassis healthy while the inter-switch link status is failed. Changing the unrelated setting does not establish the required repair at Dunhaven University; the relevant confirmation would be: Operational checks show coherent VSX roles with restored ISL and keepalive health.

Question 538

At Dunhaven University, the campus systems team is preparing a multi-building classroom network upgrade. The operational constraint is classroom Wi-Fi and VoIP availability. A production-readiness reviewer asks for proof addressing: A VSX peer dashboard shows one chassis healthy while the inter-switch link status is failed. Which result BEST demonstrates that this specific issue was resolved?

  1. Topology-change counters stabilize and the intended root remains consistent.
  2. Detailed queue telemetry explains the congestion and critical-class drop rate meets its target afterward.
  3. Operational checks show coherent VSX roles with restored ISL and keepalive health.
  4. The expected receiver group remains present across query intervals and the stream is delivered.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Operational checks show coherent VSX roles with restored ISL and keepalive health. This is the relevant acceptance observation for the reported issue: A VSX peer dashboard shows one chassis healthy while the inter-switch link status is failed. The intended corrective choice is: Distinguish VSX peer, ISL and keepalive states and apply the documented failover troubleshooting path. At Dunhaven University, this outcome verifies actual operation under classroom Wi-Fi and VoIP availability, rather than only a ticket marked complete.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Topology-change counters stabilize and the intended root remains consistent. Such an observation would verify a separate issue: STP logs show repeated topology-change notifications after a new edge connection. It would follow the distinct action: Correlate root-port transitions, BPDU events and edge-port behavior to identify unexpected topology changes. Here the reported failure is A VSX peer dashboard shows one chassis healthy while the inter-switch link status is failed. The decisive result for Dunhaven University must instead be: Operational checks show coherent VSX roles with restored ISL and keepalive health.

B:

Detailed queue telemetry explains the congestion and critical-class drop rate meets its target afterward. Such an observation would verify a separate issue: Queue-drop counters grow on a real-time interface while total bandwidth is below the line rate. It would follow the distinct action: Inspect class-specific scheduling, burst behavior and DSCP classification rather than average utilization alone. Here the reported failure is A VSX peer dashboard shows one chassis healthy while the inter-switch link status is failed. The decisive result for Dunhaven University must instead be: Operational checks show coherent VSX roles with restored ISL and keepalive health.

D:

The expected receiver group remains present across query intervals and the stream is delivered. Such an observation would verify a separate issue: Multicast members disappear and video freezes while unicast traffic continues normally. It would follow the distinct action: Inspect IGMP snooping tables, querier state and group aging alongside traffic counters. Here the reported failure is A VSX peer dashboard shows one chassis healthy while the inter-switch link status is failed. The decisive result for Dunhaven University must instead be: Operational checks show coherent VSX roles with restored ISL and keepalive health.

Question 539

At Northpoint Health, the remote-clinic systems team is preparing a rural site commissioning project. The operational constraint is remote support and access restrictions. The network investigation identifies this condition: A VSX peer dashboard shows one chassis healthy while the inter-switch link status is failed. Which action BEST corrects the stated problem?

  1. Review operational stability across routing, interfaces and change logs rather than using uptime as proof of health.
  2. Correlate root-port transitions, BPDU events and edge-port behavior to identify unexpected topology changes.
  3. Validate trap destination, version/authentication, ACL and monitoring collector reachability.
  4. Distinguish VSX peer, ISL and keepalive states and apply the documented failover troubleshooting path.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Distinguish VSX peer, ISL and keepalive states and apply the documented failover troubleshooting path. This response directly addresses the observed condition: A VSX peer dashboard shows one chassis healthy while the inter-switch link status is failed. For Northpoint Health during a rural site commissioning project, the decisive check is not merely that a configuration was entered: Operational checks show coherent VSX roles with restored ISL and keepalive health. That evidence connects the proposed correction to measurable forwarding or management behavior.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Review operational stability across routing, interfaces and change logs rather than using uptime as proof of health. That relates to a different fault: A core switch has been continuously up for months but its route-flap alarms spiked overnight. The incident in the scenario is instead: A VSX peer dashboard shows one chassis healthy while the inter-switch link status is failed. Changing the unrelated setting does not establish the required repair at Northpoint Health; the relevant confirmation would be: Operational checks show coherent VSX roles with restored ISL and keepalive health.

B:

Correlate root-port transitions, BPDU events and edge-port behavior to identify unexpected topology changes. That relates to a different fault: STP logs show repeated topology-change notifications after a new edge connection. The incident in the scenario is instead: A VSX peer dashboard shows one chassis healthy while the inter-switch link status is failed. Changing the unrelated setting does not establish the required repair at Northpoint Health; the relevant confirmation would be: Operational checks show coherent VSX roles with restored ISL and keepalive health.

C:

Validate trap destination, version/authentication, ACL and monitoring collector reachability. That relates to a different fault: A service-impacting event is absent from the monitoring platform although the switch generated an SNMP trap. The incident in the scenario is instead: A VSX peer dashboard shows one chassis healthy while the inter-switch link status is failed. Changing the unrelated setting does not establish the required repair at Northpoint Health; the relevant confirmation would be: Operational checks show coherent VSX roles with restored ISL and keepalive health.

Question 540

At Northpoint Health, the remote-clinic systems team is preparing a rural site commissioning project. The operational constraint is remote support and access restrictions. The owner reports that the correction is complete for this issue: A VSX peer dashboard shows one chassis healthy while the inter-switch link status is failed. Which result BEST demonstrates that this specific issue was resolved?

  1. The recovered link shows operational-up state and receive/transmit counters increase during test traffic.
  2. Queue and utilization measurements identify the overloaded egress class and improve after capacity or policy change.
  3. The neighbor progresses to the expected adjacency state and advertises permitted prefixes.
  4. Operational checks show coherent VSX roles with restored ISL and keepalive health.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Operational checks show coherent VSX roles with restored ISL and keepalive health. This is the relevant acceptance observation for the reported issue: A VSX peer dashboard shows one chassis healthy while the inter-switch link status is failed. The intended corrective choice is: Distinguish VSX peer, ISL and keepalive states and apply the documented failover troubleshooting path. At Northpoint Health, this outcome verifies actual operation under remote support and access restrictions, rather than only a ticket marked complete.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The recovered link shows operational-up state and receive/transmit counters increase during test traffic. Such an observation would verify a separate issue: An interface displays operationally down while its administrative setting is up, and counters show no carrier. It would follow the distinct action: Inspect physical-layer, optic and peer state rather than treating it as an administrative shutdown. Here the reported failure is A VSX peer dashboard shows one chassis healthy while the inter-switch link status is failed. The decisive result for Northpoint Health must instead be: Operational checks show coherent VSX roles with restored ISL and keepalive health.

B:

Queue and utilization measurements identify the overloaded egress class and improve after capacity or policy change. Such an observation would verify a separate issue: A port reports thousands of egress discards with low CRC errors during scheduled replication. It would follow the distinct action: Interpret output-queue congestion rather than diagnosing an optical fault from discards alone. Here the reported failure is A VSX peer dashboard shows one chassis healthy while the inter-switch link status is failed. The decisive result for Northpoint Health must instead be: Operational checks show coherent VSX roles with restored ISL and keepalive health.

C:

The neighbor progresses to the expected adjacency state and advertises permitted prefixes. Such an observation would verify a separate issue: An OSPF interface is physically up but the neighbor remains in Init rather than reaching full adjacency. It would follow the distinct action: Check hello reception, network parameters, neighbor consistency and any one-way reachability. Here the reported failure is A VSX peer dashboard shows one chassis healthy while the inter-switch link status is failed. The decisive result for Northpoint Health must instead be: Operational checks show coherent VSX roles with restored ISL and keepalive health.