McAfee-Secured Website

Exam Bundle

Exam Code: AWS Certified Cloud Practitioner CLF-C02

Exam Name AWS Certified Cloud Practitioner CLF-C02

Certification Provider: Amazon

Corresponding Certification: AWS Certified Cloud Practitioner

Amazon AWS Certified Cloud Practitioner CLF-C02 Bundle $44.99

100% Amazon AWS Certified Cloud Practitioner CLF-C02 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real AWS Certified Cloud Practitioner CLF-C02 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    AWS Certified Cloud Practitioner CLF-C02 Questions & Answers

    999 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual AWS Certified Cloud Practitioner CLF-C02 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • AWS Certified Cloud Practitioner CLF-C02 Video Course

    AWS Certified Cloud Practitioner CLF-C02 Video Course

    274 Video Lectures

    AWS Certified Cloud Practitioner CLF-C02 Video Course is developed by Amazon Professionals to help you pass the AWS Certified Cloud Practitioner CLF-C02 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass AWS Certified Cloud Practitioner CLF-C02 exam.
  • Study Guide

    AWS Certified Cloud Practitioner CLF-C02 Study Guide

    472 PDF Pages

    Developed by industry experts, this 472-page guide spells out in painstaking detail all of the information you need to ace AWS Certified Cloud Practitioner CLF-C02 exam.

AWS Certified Cloud Practitioner CLF-C02 Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $194.97
Bundle Price: $149.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    999 Questions

    $124.99
  • AWS Certified Cloud Practitioner CLF-C02 Video Course

    Video Course

    274 Video Lectures

    $39.99
  • Study Guide

    Study Guide

    472 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Amazon AWS Certified Cloud Practitioner CLF-C02 Practice Test 48

Question 470

Which service-to-requirement explanation best fits this situation: An application fleet needs a shared elastic NFS file store without managing its own file server?

  1. Amazon EBS — EBS provides persistent block volumes for supported EC2 instance attachments
  2. Amazon EFS — EFS is a managed elastic shared file system using NFS for Linux-compatible workloads
  3. Amazon S3 — stores objects in buckets via object APIs
  4. Amazon FSx for Windows File Server — FSx for Windows File Server provides managed Windows-native file sharing over SMB

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

EFS is a managed elastic shared file system using NFS for Linux-compatible workloads. This fits the situation: An application fleet needs a shared elastic NFS file store without managing its own file server.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Amazon EBS: EBS provides persistent block volumes for supported EC2 instance attachments. This does not address the need for An application fleet needs a shared elastic NFS file store without managing its own file server. The appropriate Amazon EFS applies because EFS is a managed elastic shared file system using NFS for Linux-compatible workloads.

C:

Amazon S3 stores objects in buckets via object APIs. This does not address the need for An application fleet needs a shared elastic NFS file store without managing its own file server. The appropriate Amazon EFS applies because EFS is a managed elastic shared file system using NFS for Linux-compatible workloads.

D:

Amazon FSx for Windows File Server: FSx for Windows File Server provides managed Windows-native file sharing over SMB. This does not address the need for An application fleet needs a shared elastic NFS file store without managing its own file server. The appropriate Amazon EFS applies because EFS is a managed elastic shared file system using NFS for Linux-compatible workloads.

Question 471

An enterprise application needs managed Windows-compatible shared files and SMB features. Which option is the best fit?

  1. Amazon S3
  2. Amazon EFS
  3. Amazon FSx for Windows File Server
  4. Amazon EBS

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

FSx for Windows File Server provides managed Windows-native file sharing over SMB. This fits the case: An enterprise application needs managed Windows-compatible shared files and SMB features.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Amazon S3 stores objects in buckets via object APIs. That does not meet the requirement: An enterprise application needs managed Windows-compatible shared files and SMB features.

B:

Amazon EFS provides elastic shared NFS file storage. That does not meet the requirement: An enterprise application needs managed Windows-compatible shared files and SMB features.

D:

Amazon EBS: EBS provides persistent block volumes for supported EC2 instance attachments. That does not meet the requirement: An enterprise application needs managed Windows-compatible shared files and SMB features.

Question 472

An enterprise application needs managed Windows-compatible shared files and SMB features. Which justification most accurately supports the recommended choice?

  1. Amazon EBS — EBS provides persistent block volumes for supported EC2 instance attachments
  2. Amazon EFS — provides elastic shared NFS file storage
  3. Amazon S3 — stores objects in buckets via object APIs
  4. Amazon FSx for Windows File Server — FSx for Windows File Server provides managed Windows-native file sharing over SMB

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

FSx for Windows File Server provides managed Windows-native file sharing over SMB. This fits the situation: An enterprise application needs managed Windows-compatible shared files and SMB features.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Amazon EBS: EBS provides persistent block volumes for supported EC2 instance attachments. This does not address the need for An enterprise application needs managed Windows-compatible shared files and SMB features. The appropriate Amazon FSx for Windows File Server applies because FSx for Windows File Server provides managed Windows-native file sharing over SMB.

B:

Amazon EFS provides elastic shared NFS file storage. This does not address the need for An enterprise application needs managed Windows-compatible shared files and SMB features. The appropriate Amazon FSx for Windows File Server applies because FSx for Windows File Server provides managed Windows-native file sharing over SMB.

C:

Amazon S3 stores objects in buckets via object APIs. This does not address the need for An enterprise application needs managed Windows-compatible shared files and SMB features. The appropriate Amazon FSx for Windows File Server applies because FSx for Windows File Server provides managed Windows-native file sharing over SMB.

Question 473

Consider this AWS requirement: A Windows workload requires native NTFS/SMB file-service capabilities in AWS. What should the team select?

  1. Amazon FSx for Windows File Server
  2. Amazon S3
  3. Amazon EFS
  4. Amazon EBS

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

FSx for Windows File Server provides managed Windows-native file sharing over SMB. This fits the case: A Windows workload requires native NTFS/SMB file-service capabilities in AWS.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Amazon S3 stores objects in buckets via object APIs. That does not meet the requirement: Consider this AWS requirement: A Windows workload requires native NTFS/SMB file-service capabilities in AWS.

C:

Amazon EFS provides elastic shared NFS file storage. That does not meet the requirement: Consider this AWS requirement: A Windows workload requires native NTFS/SMB file-service capabilities in AWS.

D:

Amazon EBS: EBS provides persistent block volumes for supported EC2 instance attachments. That does not meet the requirement: Consider this AWS requirement: A Windows workload requires native NTFS/SMB file-service capabilities in AWS.

Question 474

A review board wants evidence for this choice: A Windows workload requires native NTFS/SMB file-service capabilities in AWS. Which reasoning is best aligned with the requirement?

  1. Amazon EBS — EBS provides persistent block volumes for supported EC2 instance attachments
  2. Amazon FSx for Windows File Server — FSx for Windows File Server provides managed Windows-native file sharing over SMB
  3. Amazon S3 — stores objects in buckets via object APIs
  4. Amazon EFS — provides elastic shared NFS file storage

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

FSx for Windows File Server provides managed Windows-native file sharing over SMB. This fits the situation: A Windows workload requires native NTFS/SMB file-service capabilities in AWS.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Amazon EBS: EBS provides persistent block volumes for supported EC2 instance attachments. This does not address the need for A Windows workload requires native NTFS/SMB file-service capabilities in AWS. The appropriate Amazon FSx for Windows File Server applies because FSx for Windows File Server provides managed Windows-native file sharing over SMB.

C:

Amazon S3 stores objects in buckets via object APIs. This does not address the need for A Windows workload requires native NTFS/SMB file-service capabilities in AWS. The appropriate Amazon FSx for Windows File Server applies because FSx for Windows File Server provides managed Windows-native file sharing over SMB.

D:

Amazon EFS provides elastic shared NFS file storage. This does not address the need for A Windows workload requires native NTFS/SMB file-service capabilities in AWS. The appropriate Amazon FSx for Windows File Server applies because FSx for Windows File Server provides managed Windows-native file sharing over SMB.

Question 475

A compliance team stores rarely read documents and accepts multi-minute to hour retrieval for cost savings. Which cloud capability or service directly addresses the requirement?

  1. S3 One Zone-IA
  2. S3 Standard
  3. S3 Glacier Flexible Retrieval
  4. Amazon EBS gp3

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

S3 Glacier Flexible Retrieval is an archival object-storage class with retrieval times longer than online S3 classes. This fits the case: A compliance team stores rarely read documents and accepts multi-minute to hour retrieval for cost savings.

Incorrect Answers

A:

S3 One Zone-IA uses a single Availability Zone for infrequently accessed objects. That does not meet the requirement: A compliance team stores rarely read documents and accepts multi-minute to hour retrieval for cost savings.

B:

S3 Standard targets frequently accessed objects with low-latency access and multi-AZ resilience. That does not meet the requirement: A compliance team stores rarely read documents and accepts multi-minute to hour retrieval for cost savings.

D:

Amazon EBS gp3 is SSD-based persistent EC2 block storage. That does not meet the requirement: A compliance team stores rarely read documents and accepts multi-minute to hour retrieval for cost savings.

Question 476

A compliance team stores rarely read documents and accepts multi-minute to hour retrieval for cost savings. Which explanation correctly distinguishes the appropriate approach from the alternatives?

  1. S3 Standard — S3 Standard targets frequently accessed objects with low-latency access and multi-AZ resilience
  2. S3 One Zone-IA — uses a single Availability Zone for infrequently accessed objects
  3. Amazon EBS gp3 — is SSD-based persistent EC2 block storage
  4. S3 Glacier Flexible Retrieval — is an archival object-storage class with retrieval times longer than online S3 classes

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

S3 Glacier Flexible Retrieval is an archival object-storage class with retrieval times longer than online S3 classes. This fits the situation: A compliance team stores rarely read documents and accepts multi-minute to hour retrieval for cost savings.

Incorrect Answers

A:

S3 Standard targets frequently accessed objects with low-latency access and multi-AZ resilience. This does not address the need for A compliance team stores rarely read documents and accepts multi-minute to hour retrieval for cost savings. The appropriate S3 Glacier Flexible Retrieval applies because S3 Glacier Flexible Retrieval is an archival object-storage class with retrieval times longer than online S3 classes.

B:

S3 One Zone-IA uses a single Availability Zone for infrequently accessed objects. This does not address the need for A compliance team stores rarely read documents and accepts multi-minute to hour retrieval for cost savings. The appropriate S3 Glacier Flexible Retrieval applies because S3 Glacier Flexible Retrieval is an archival object-storage class with retrieval times longer than online S3 classes.

C:

Amazon EBS gp3 is SSD-based persistent EC2 block storage. This does not address the need for A compliance team stores rarely read documents and accepts multi-minute to hour retrieval for cost savings. The appropriate S3 Glacier Flexible Retrieval applies because S3 Glacier Flexible Retrieval is an archival object-storage class with retrieval times longer than online S3 classes.

Question 477

A technical reviewer evaluates this need: A historical archive can tolerate retrieval delays in exchange for a lower-cost S3 archive tier. Which choice is most appropriate?

  1. S3 Glacier Flexible Retrieval
  2. S3 One Zone-IA
  3. Amazon EBS gp3
  4. S3 Standard

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

S3 Glacier Flexible Retrieval is an archival object-storage class with retrieval times longer than online S3 classes. This fits the case: A historical archive can tolerate retrieval delays in exchange for a lower-cost S3 archive tier.

Incorrect Answers

B:

S3 One Zone-IA uses a single Availability Zone for infrequently accessed objects. That does not meet the requirement: A technical reviewer evaluates this need: A historical archive can tolerate retrieval delays in exchange for a lower-cost S3 archive tier.

C:

Amazon EBS gp3 is SSD-based persistent EC2 block storage. That does not meet the requirement: A technical reviewer evaluates this need: A historical archive can tolerate retrieval delays in exchange for a lower-cost S3 archive tier.

D:

S3 Standard targets frequently accessed objects with low-latency access and multi-AZ resilience. That does not meet the requirement: A technical reviewer evaluates this need: A historical archive can tolerate retrieval delays in exchange for a lower-cost S3 archive tier.

Question 478

For the following need, select the most defensible technical rationale: A historical archive can tolerate retrieval delays in exchange for a lower-cost S3 archive tier.

  1. Amazon EBS gp3 — is SSD-based persistent EC2 block storage
  2. S3 Glacier Flexible Retrieval — is an archival object-storage class with retrieval times longer than online S3 classes
  3. S3 One Zone-IA — uses a single Availability Zone for infrequently accessed objects
  4. S3 Standard — S3 Standard targets frequently accessed objects with low-latency access and multi-AZ resilience

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

S3 Glacier Flexible Retrieval is an archival object-storage class with retrieval times longer than online S3 classes. This fits the situation: A historical archive can tolerate retrieval delays in exchange for a lower-cost S3 archive tier.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Amazon EBS gp3 is SSD-based persistent EC2 block storage. This does not address the need for A historical archive can tolerate retrieval delays in exchange for a lower-cost S3 archive tier. The appropriate S3 Glacier Flexible Retrieval applies because S3 Glacier Flexible Retrieval is an archival object-storage class with retrieval times longer than online S3 classes.

C:

S3 One Zone-IA uses a single Availability Zone for infrequently accessed objects. This does not address the need for A historical archive can tolerate retrieval delays in exchange for a lower-cost S3 archive tier. The appropriate S3 Glacier Flexible Retrieval applies because S3 Glacier Flexible Retrieval is an archival object-storage class with retrieval times longer than online S3 classes.

D:

S3 Standard targets frequently accessed objects with low-latency access and multi-AZ resilience. This does not address the need for A historical archive can tolerate retrieval delays in exchange for a lower-cost S3 archive tier. The appropriate S3 Glacier Flexible Retrieval applies because S3 Glacier Flexible Retrieval is an archival object-storage class with retrieval times longer than online S3 classes.

Question 479

A public media site needs objects accessible frequently with low-latency access. Identify the AWS approach that most directly meets the stated goal.

  1. Amazon EBS
  2. S3 Glacier Deep Archive
  3. S3 Standard
  4. S3 One Zone-IA

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

S3 Standard targets frequently accessed objects with low-latency access and multi-AZ resilience. This fits the case: A public media site needs objects accessible frequently with low-latency access.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Amazon EBS: EBS provides persistent block volumes for supported EC2 instance attachments. That does not meet the requirement: A public media site needs objects accessible frequently with low-latency access.

B:

S3 Glacier Deep Archive is designed for very infrequently accessed archive objects with long retrieval times. That does not meet the requirement: A public media site needs objects accessible frequently with low-latency access.

D:

S3 One Zone-IA uses a single Availability Zone for infrequently accessed objects. That does not meet the requirement: A public media site needs objects accessible frequently with low-latency access.

Question 480

Which service-to-requirement explanation best fits this situation: A public media site needs objects accessible frequently with low-latency access?

  1. S3 Glacier Deep Archive — is designed for very infrequently accessed archive objects with long retrieval times
  2. Amazon EBS — EBS provides persistent block volumes for supported EC2 instance attachments
  3. S3 One Zone-IA — uses a single Availability Zone for infrequently accessed objects
  4. S3 Standard — targets frequently accessed objects with low-latency access and multi-AZ resilience

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

S3 Standard targets frequently accessed objects with low-latency access and multi-AZ resilience. This fits the situation: A public media site needs objects accessible frequently with low-latency access.

Incorrect Answers

A:

S3 Glacier Deep Archive is designed for very infrequently accessed archive objects with long retrieval times. This does not address the need for A public media site needs objects accessible frequently with low-latency access. The appropriate S3 Standard applies because S3 Standard targets frequently accessed objects with low-latency access and multi-AZ resilience.

B:

Amazon EBS: EBS provides persistent block volumes for supported EC2 instance attachments. This does not address the need for A public media site needs objects accessible frequently with low-latency access. The appropriate S3 Standard applies because S3 Standard targets frequently accessed objects with low-latency access and multi-AZ resilience.

C:

S3 One Zone-IA uses a single Availability Zone for infrequently accessed objects. This does not address the need for A public media site needs objects accessible frequently with low-latency access. The appropriate S3 Standard applies because S3 Standard targets frequently accessed objects with low-latency access and multi-AZ resilience.