McAfee-Secured Website

Exam Bundle

Exam Code: AWS Certified Cloud Practitioner CLF-C02

Exam Name AWS Certified Cloud Practitioner CLF-C02

Certification Provider: Amazon

Corresponding Certification: AWS Certified Cloud Practitioner

Amazon AWS Certified Cloud Practitioner CLF-C02 Bundle $44.99

100% Amazon AWS Certified Cloud Practitioner CLF-C02 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real AWS Certified Cloud Practitioner CLF-C02 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    AWS Certified Cloud Practitioner CLF-C02 Questions & Answers

    999 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual AWS Certified Cloud Practitioner CLF-C02 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • AWS Certified Cloud Practitioner CLF-C02 Video Course

    AWS Certified Cloud Practitioner CLF-C02 Video Course

    274 Video Lectures

    AWS Certified Cloud Practitioner CLF-C02 Video Course is developed by Amazon Professionals to help you pass the AWS Certified Cloud Practitioner CLF-C02 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass AWS Certified Cloud Practitioner CLF-C02 exam.
  • Study Guide

    AWS Certified Cloud Practitioner CLF-C02 Study Guide

    472 PDF Pages

    Developed by industry experts, this 472-page guide spells out in painstaking detail all of the information you need to ace AWS Certified Cloud Practitioner CLF-C02 exam.

AWS Certified Cloud Practitioner CLF-C02 Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $194.97
Bundle Price: $149.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    999 Questions

    $124.99
  • AWS Certified Cloud Practitioner CLF-C02 Video Course

    Video Course

    274 Video Lectures

    $39.99
  • Study Guide

    Study Guide

    472 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Amazon AWS Certified Cloud Practitioner CLF-C02 Practice Test 47

Question 460

Which service-to-requirement explanation best fits this situation: A photo-sharing service needs durable object storage for user images accessed through APIs?

  1. Amazon EBS — EBS provides persistent block volumes for supported EC2 instance attachments
  2. Amazon FSx — provides managed specialized file systems
  3. Amazon EFS — provides elastic shared NFS file storage
  4. Amazon S3 — S3 stores objects in buckets through object APIs rather than mounting a block volume or conventional shared file system

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

S3 stores objects in buckets through object APIs rather than mounting a block volume or conventional shared file system. This fits the situation: A photo-sharing service needs durable object storage for user images accessed through APIs.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Amazon EBS: EBS provides persistent block volumes for supported EC2 instance attachments. This does not address the need for A photo-sharing service needs durable object storage for user images accessed through APIs. The appropriate Amazon S3 applies because S3 stores objects in buckets through object APIs rather than mounting a block volume or conventional shared file system.

B:

Amazon FSx provides managed specialized file systems. This does not address the need for A photo-sharing service needs durable object storage for user images accessed through APIs. The appropriate Amazon S3 applies because S3 stores objects in buckets through object APIs rather than mounting a block volume or conventional shared file system.

C:

Amazon EFS provides elastic shared NFS file storage. This does not address the need for A photo-sharing service needs durable object storage for user images accessed through APIs. The appropriate Amazon S3 applies because S3 stores objects in buckets through object APIs rather than mounting a block volume or conventional shared file system.

Question 461

A team stores PDF documents as objects with metadata and bucket-based management. Which option is the best fit?

  1. Amazon S3
  2. Amazon FSx
  3. Amazon EBS
  4. Amazon EFS

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

S3 stores objects in buckets through object APIs rather than mounting a block volume or conventional shared file system. This fits the case: A team stores PDF documents as objects with metadata and bucket-based management.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Amazon FSx provides managed specialized file systems. That does not meet the requirement: A team stores PDF documents as objects with metadata and bucket-based management.

C:

Amazon EBS: EBS provides persistent block volumes for supported EC2 instance attachments. That does not meet the requirement: A team stores PDF documents as objects with metadata and bucket-based management.

D:

Amazon EFS provides elastic shared NFS file storage. That does not meet the requirement: A team stores PDF documents as objects with metadata and bucket-based management.

Question 462

A team stores PDF documents as objects with metadata and bucket-based management. Which justification most accurately supports the recommended choice?

  1. Amazon EBS — EBS provides persistent block volumes for supported EC2 instance attachments
  2. Amazon S3 — S3 stores objects in buckets through object APIs rather than mounting a block volume or conventional shared file system
  3. Amazon FSx — provides managed specialized file systems
  4. Amazon EFS — provides elastic shared NFS file storage

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

S3 stores objects in buckets through object APIs rather than mounting a block volume or conventional shared file system. This fits the situation: A team stores PDF documents as objects with metadata and bucket-based management.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Amazon EBS: EBS provides persistent block volumes for supported EC2 instance attachments. This does not address the need for A team stores PDF documents as objects with metadata and bucket-based management. The appropriate Amazon S3 applies because S3 stores objects in buckets through object APIs rather than mounting a block volume or conventional shared file system.

C:

Amazon FSx provides managed specialized file systems. This does not address the need for A team stores PDF documents as objects with metadata and bucket-based management. The appropriate Amazon S3 applies because S3 stores objects in buckets through object APIs rather than mounting a block volume or conventional shared file system.

D:

Amazon EFS provides elastic shared NFS file storage. This does not address the need for A team stores PDF documents as objects with metadata and bucket-based management. The appropriate Amazon S3 applies because S3 stores objects in buckets through object APIs rather than mounting a block volume or conventional shared file system.

Question 463

Consider this AWS requirement: An EC2-based database requires persistent block-level storage attached to its instance. What should the team select?

  1. Amazon EFS
  2. Amazon S3
  3. Amazon EBS
  4. Amazon S3 Glacier

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

EBS provides persistent block volumes for supported EC2 instance attachments. This fits the case: An EC2-based database requires persistent block-level storage attached to its instance.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Amazon EFS provides elastic shared NFS file storage. That does not meet the requirement: Consider this AWS requirement: An EC2-based database requires persistent block-level storage attached to its instance.

B:

Amazon S3 stores objects in buckets via object APIs. That does not meet the requirement: Consider this AWS requirement: An EC2-based database requires persistent block-level storage attached to its instance.

D:

Amazon S3 Glacier is a collection of S3 archive-oriented storage classes. That does not meet the requirement: Consider this AWS requirement: An EC2-based database requires persistent block-level storage attached to its instance.

Question 464

A review board wants evidence for this choice: An EC2-based database requires persistent block-level storage attached to its instance. Which reasoning is best aligned with the requirement?

  1. Amazon S3 — stores objects in buckets via object APIs
  2. Amazon S3 Glacier — is a collection of S3 archive-oriented storage classes
  3. Amazon EFS — provides elastic shared NFS file storage
  4. Amazon EBS — EBS provides persistent block volumes for supported EC2 instance attachments

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

EBS provides persistent block volumes for supported EC2 instance attachments. This fits the situation: An EC2-based database requires persistent block-level storage attached to its instance.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Amazon S3 stores objects in buckets via object APIs. This does not address the need for An EC2-based database requires persistent block-level storage attached to its instance. The appropriate Amazon EBS applies because EBS provides persistent block volumes for supported EC2 instance attachments.

B:

Amazon S3 Glacier is a collection of S3 archive-oriented storage classes. This does not address the need for An EC2-based database requires persistent block-level storage attached to its instance. The appropriate Amazon EBS applies because EBS provides persistent block volumes for supported EC2 instance attachments.

C:

Amazon EFS provides elastic shared NFS file storage. This does not address the need for An EC2-based database requires persistent block-level storage attached to its instance. The appropriate Amazon EBS applies because EBS provides persistent block volumes for supported EC2 instance attachments.

Question 465

An administrator must present a durable block device to a virtual machine for its filesystem. Which cloud capability or service directly addresses the requirement?

  1. Amazon EBS
  2. Amazon EFS
  3. Amazon S3
  4. Amazon S3 Glacier

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

EBS provides persistent block volumes for supported EC2 instance attachments. This fits the case: An administrator must present a durable block device to a virtual machine for its filesystem.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Amazon EFS provides elastic shared NFS file storage. That does not meet the requirement: An administrator must present a durable block device to a virtual machine for its filesystem.

C:

Amazon S3 stores objects in buckets via object APIs. That does not meet the requirement: An administrator must present a durable block device to a virtual machine for its filesystem.

D:

Amazon S3 Glacier is a collection of S3 archive-oriented storage classes. That does not meet the requirement: An administrator must present a durable block device to a virtual machine for its filesystem.

Question 466

An administrator must present a durable block device to a virtual machine for its filesystem. Which explanation correctly distinguishes the appropriate approach from the alternatives?

  1. Amazon S3 — stores objects in buckets via object APIs
  2. Amazon EBS — EBS provides persistent block volumes for supported EC2 instance attachments
  3. Amazon EFS — provides elastic shared NFS file storage
  4. Amazon S3 Glacier — is a collection of S3 archive-oriented storage classes

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

EBS provides persistent block volumes for supported EC2 instance attachments. This fits the situation: An administrator must present a durable block device to a virtual machine for its filesystem.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Amazon S3 stores objects in buckets via object APIs. This does not address the need for An administrator must present a durable block device to a virtual machine for its filesystem. The appropriate Amazon EBS applies because EBS provides persistent block volumes for supported EC2 instance attachments.

C:

Amazon EFS provides elastic shared NFS file storage. This does not address the need for An administrator must present a durable block device to a virtual machine for its filesystem. The appropriate Amazon EBS applies because EBS provides persistent block volumes for supported EC2 instance attachments.

D:

Amazon S3 Glacier is a collection of S3 archive-oriented storage classes. This does not address the need for An administrator must present a durable block device to a virtual machine for its filesystem. The appropriate Amazon EBS applies because EBS provides persistent block volumes for supported EC2 instance attachments.

Question 467

A technical reviewer evaluates this need: Several Linux EC2 instances require concurrent access to the same managed shared filesystem. Which choice is most appropriate?

  1. Amazon EBS
  2. Amazon S3
  3. Amazon EFS
  4. Amazon FSx for Windows File Server

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

EFS is a managed elastic shared file system using NFS for Linux-compatible workloads. This fits the case: Several Linux EC2 instances require concurrent access to the same managed shared filesystem.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Amazon EBS: EBS provides persistent block volumes for supported EC2 instance attachments. That does not meet the requirement: A technical reviewer evaluates this need: Several Linux EC2 instances require concurrent access to the same managed shared filesystem.

B:

Amazon S3 stores objects in buckets via object APIs. That does not meet the requirement: A technical reviewer evaluates this need: Several Linux EC2 instances require concurrent access to the same managed shared filesystem.

D:

Amazon FSx for Windows File Server: FSx for Windows File Server provides managed Windows-native file sharing over SMB. That does not meet the requirement: A technical reviewer evaluates this need: Several Linux EC2 instances require concurrent access to the same managed shared filesystem.

Question 468

For the following need, select the most defensible technical rationale: Several Linux EC2 instances require concurrent access to the same managed shared filesystem.

  1. Amazon S3 — stores objects in buckets via object APIs
  2. Amazon EBS — EBS provides persistent block volumes for supported EC2 instance attachments
  3. Amazon FSx for Windows File Server — FSx for Windows File Server provides managed Windows-native file sharing over SMB
  4. Amazon EFS — EFS is a managed elastic shared file system using NFS for Linux-compatible workloads

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

EFS is a managed elastic shared file system using NFS for Linux-compatible workloads. This fits the situation: Several Linux EC2 instances require concurrent access to the same managed shared filesystem.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Amazon S3 stores objects in buckets via object APIs. This does not address the need for Several Linux EC2 instances require concurrent access to the same managed shared filesystem. The appropriate Amazon EFS applies because EFS is a managed elastic shared file system using NFS for Linux-compatible workloads.

B:

Amazon EBS: EBS provides persistent block volumes for supported EC2 instance attachments. This does not address the need for Several Linux EC2 instances require concurrent access to the same managed shared filesystem. The appropriate Amazon EFS applies because EFS is a managed elastic shared file system using NFS for Linux-compatible workloads.

C:

Amazon FSx for Windows File Server: FSx for Windows File Server provides managed Windows-native file sharing over SMB. This does not address the need for Several Linux EC2 instances require concurrent access to the same managed shared filesystem. The appropriate Amazon EFS applies because EFS is a managed elastic shared file system using NFS for Linux-compatible workloads.

Question 469

An application fleet needs a shared elastic NFS file store without managing its own file server. Identify the AWS approach that most directly meets the stated goal.

  1. Amazon EFS
  2. Amazon S3
  3. Amazon FSx for Windows File Server
  4. Amazon EBS

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

EFS is a managed elastic shared file system using NFS for Linux-compatible workloads. This fits the case: An application fleet needs a shared elastic NFS file store without managing its own file server.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Amazon S3 stores objects in buckets via object APIs. That does not meet the requirement: An application fleet needs a shared elastic NFS file store without managing its own file server.

C:

Amazon FSx for Windows File Server: FSx for Windows File Server provides managed Windows-native file sharing over SMB. That does not meet the requirement: An application fleet needs a shared elastic NFS file store without managing its own file server.

D:

Amazon EBS: EBS provides persistent block volumes for supported EC2 instance attachments. That does not meet the requirement: An application fleet needs a shared elastic NFS file store without managing its own file server.

Question 470

Which service-to-requirement explanation best fits this situation: An application fleet needs a shared elastic NFS file store without managing its own file server?

  1. Amazon EBS — EBS provides persistent block volumes for supported EC2 instance attachments
  2. Amazon EFS — EFS is a managed elastic shared file system using NFS for Linux-compatible workloads
  3. Amazon S3 — stores objects in buckets via object APIs
  4. Amazon FSx for Windows File Server — FSx for Windows File Server provides managed Windows-native file sharing over SMB

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

EFS is a managed elastic shared file system using NFS for Linux-compatible workloads. This fits the situation: An application fleet needs a shared elastic NFS file store without managing its own file server.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Amazon EBS: EBS provides persistent block volumes for supported EC2 instance attachments. This does not address the need for An application fleet needs a shared elastic NFS file store without managing its own file server. The appropriate Amazon EFS applies because EFS is a managed elastic shared file system using NFS for Linux-compatible workloads.

C:

Amazon S3 stores objects in buckets via object APIs. This does not address the need for An application fleet needs a shared elastic NFS file store without managing its own file server. The appropriate Amazon EFS applies because EFS is a managed elastic shared file system using NFS for Linux-compatible workloads.

D:

Amazon FSx for Windows File Server: FSx for Windows File Server provides managed Windows-native file sharing over SMB. This does not address the need for An application fleet needs a shared elastic NFS file store without managing its own file server. The appropriate Amazon EFS applies because EFS is a managed elastic shared file system using NFS for Linux-compatible workloads.