Question 390
Which service-to-requirement explanation best fits this situation: A service owner wants task-level containers with infrastructure capacity managed for supported orchestration?
Explanation
Correct Answer
Fargate is serverless compute capacity for supported ECS and EKS container workloads. This fits the situation: A service owner wants task-level containers with infrastructure capacity managed for supported orchestration.
Incorrect Answers
Amazon S3 stores objects in buckets via object APIs. This does not address the need for A service owner wants task-level containers with infrastructure capacity managed for supported orchestration. The appropriate AWS Fargate applies because Fargate is serverless compute capacity for supported ECS and EKS container workloads.
Amazon EC2 dedicated host allocates physical EC2 server capacity with host-level control. This does not address the need for A service owner wants task-level containers with infrastructure capacity managed for supported orchestration. The appropriate AWS Fargate applies because Fargate is serverless compute capacity for supported ECS and EKS container workloads.
AWS Batch on EC2: Schedules batch computing jobs that may use managed EC2 environments. This does not address the need for A service owner wants task-level containers with infrastructure capacity managed for supported orchestration. The appropriate AWS Fargate applies because Fargate is serverless compute capacity for supported ECS and EKS container workloads.