Question 370
Which service-to-requirement explanation best fits this situation: A public agency must select an AWS deployment geography to satisfy legal residency constraints?
Explanation
Correct Answer
Region selection and service-specific controls help meet data residency commitments; regions are not interchangeable for legal placement. This fits the situation: A public agency must select an AWS deployment geography to satisfy legal residency constraints.
Incorrect Answers
Random automatic cross-Region copies: Lack a deliberate supported replication design and do not guarantee recovery objectives. This does not address the need for A public agency must select an AWS deployment geography to satisfy legal residency constraints. The appropriate Region-aware data placement applies because Region selection and service-specific controls help meet data residency commitments; regions are not interchangeable for legal placement.
Any global edge cache: Does not guarantee regulatory origin-region data residency. This does not address the need for A public agency must select an AWS deployment geography to satisfy legal residency constraints. The appropriate Region-aware data placement applies because Region selection and service-specific controls help meet data residency commitments; regions are not interchangeable for legal placement.
IAM role naming: Names an identity resource but cannot enforce data residency. This does not address the need for A public agency must select an AWS deployment geography to satisfy legal residency constraints. The appropriate Region-aware data placement applies because Region selection and service-specific controls help meet data residency commitments; regions are not interchangeable for legal placement.