McAfee-Secured Website

Exam Bundle

Exam Code: SC-401

Exam Name Administering Information Security in Microsoft 365

Certification Provider: Microsoft

Corresponding Certification: Microsoft Certified: Information Security Administrator Associate

Microsoft SC-401 Bundle $25.00

100% Microsoft SC-401 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real SC-401 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    SC-401 Questions & Answers

    291 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual SC-401 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • SC-401 Video Course

    SC-401 Video Course

    101 Video Lectures

    SC-401 Video Course is developed by Microsoft Professionals to help you pass the SC-401 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Administering Information Security in Microsoft 365 exam.

Administering Information Security in Microsoft 365 (SC-401) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $164.98
Bundle Price: $139.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    291 Questions

    $124.99
  • SC-401 Video Course

    Video Course

    101 Video Lectures

    $39.99

Microsoft SC-401 Practice Test 38

Question 370

The chosen administrative action is: Select the supported target SharePoint location and configure precise included-site scope. In the context of A branch office wants its DLP policy to inspect only a specific SharePoint site. Which result constitutes the best validation?

  1. The rule acts only when the configured evidence threshold is met.
  2. Only the targeted site is subject to the selected rule during testing.
  3. The monitored file receives the configured safe response and event is recorded.
  4. The case investigation attributes the final action to the correct rule and condition.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Only the targeted site is subject to the selected rule during testing. This result tests the required outcome for the selected control rather than an unrelated security capability. The requirement being evaluated here is: A branch office wants its DLP policy to inspect only a specific SharePoint site.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The rule acts only when the configured evidence threshold is met. That evidence would matter for A second Microsoft 365 business unit reports the following protection gap: The privacy team needs a rule requiring several distinct sensitive information matches instead of any one number. It needs a configuration that can be tested without a tenant-wide change. but the current implementation is Select the supported target SharePoint location and configure precise included-site scope. The requirement being evaluated here is: A branch office wants its DLP policy to inspect only a specific SharePoint site.

C:

The monitored file receives the configured safe response and event is recorded serves a different requirement. It does not resolve the specific issue addressed by only the targeted site is subject to the selected rule during testing.

D:

The case investigation attributes the final action to the correct rule and condition. That evidence would matter for A newly assigned security administrator inherits this open requirement: A DLP policy produces unexpected block results on a particular document. The team needs a supported control, not only a policy document. but the current implementation is Select the supported target SharePoint location and configure precise included-site scope. The requirement being evaluated here is: A branch office wants its DLP policy to inspect only a specific SharePoint site.

Question 371

A compliance review identifies this requirement: An internal audit requests technical evidence for this requirement: A branch office wants its DLP policy to inspect only a specific SharePoint site. The owner authorizes a limited pilot before wider enforcement. Which implementation should be prioritized?

  1. Configure a DLP policy for SharePoint and OneDrive with user notifications and policy tips.
  2. Review the policy's selected workloads, included locations and exclusions.
  3. Select the supported target SharePoint location and configure precise included-site scope.
  4. Add Endpoint DLP to the policy location and configure the supported print action.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Select the supported target SharePoint location and configure precise included-site scope. The intervention addresses the specific classification or security decision being asked. The controlled acceptance condition is: Only the targeted site is subject to the selected rule during testing. The requirement being evaluated here is: An internal audit requests technical evidence for this requirement: A branch office wants its DLP policy to inspect only a specific SharePoint site. The owner authorizes a limited pilot before wider enforcement.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Configuring a DLP policy for SharePoint and OneDrive with user notifications and policy tips addresses a different data-protection mechanism. It does not provide the specific safeguard required here: select the supported target SharePoint location and configure precise included-site scope.

B:

Reviewing the policy's selected workloads, included locations and exclusions addresses a different classification need. It does not demonstrate only the targeted site is subject to the selected rule during testing.

D:

Add Endpoint DLP to the policy location and configure the supported print action addresses a different data-protection mechanism. It does not provide the specific safeguard required here: select the supported target SharePoint location and configure precise included-site scope.

Question 372

A team selected the following control: Select the supported target SharePoint location and configure precise included-site scope. The business requirement is: An internal audit requests technical evidence for this requirement: A branch office wants its DLP policy to inspect only a specific SharePoint site. The owner authorizes a limited pilot before wider enforcement. Which observation best validates the outcome?

  1. The rule acts only when the configured evidence threshold is met.
  2. A controlled test reveals which applicable rule determines the effective action.
  3. The monitored file receives the configured safe response and event is recorded.
  4. Only the targeted site is subject to the selected rule during testing.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Only the targeted site is subject to the selected rule during testing. This is the scenario-specific success signal for implementing: Select the supported target SharePoint location and configure precise included-site scope. The requirement being evaluated here is: An internal audit requests technical evidence for this requirement: A branch office wants its DLP policy to inspect only a specific SharePoint site. The owner authorizes a limited pilot before wider enforcement.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The rule acts only when the configured evidence threshold is met serves a different requirement. It does not resolve the specific issue addressed by only the targeted site is subject to the selected rule during testing.

B:

A controlled test reveals which applicable rule determines the effective action serves a different requirement. It does not resolve the specific issue addressed by only the targeted site is subject to the selected rule during testing.

C:

The monitored file receives the configured safe response and event is recorded serves a different requirement. It does not resolve the specific issue addressed by only the targeted site is subject to the selected rule during testing.

Question 373

An information security administrator faces this requirement: A regulator needs records of DLP enforcement activity to support incident response. Which configuration best addresses the specified need?

  1. Enable appropriate DLP alerting and investigate events in the Microsoft Purview portal.
  2. Configure a DLP policy for SharePoint and OneDrive with user notifications and policy tips.
  3. Delegate appropriate Purview DLP administrative and investigation permissions.
  4. Add Endpoint DLP to the policy location and configure the supported print action.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Enable appropriate DLP alerting and investigate events in the Microsoft Purview portal. Verify with this outcome: The investigation record contains the matching action, time, affected workload and scoped user.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Configuring a DLP policy for SharePoint and OneDrive with user notifications and policy tips addresses a different data-protection mechanism. It does not provide the specific safeguard required here: enable appropriate DLP alerting and investigate events in the Microsoft Purview portal.

C:

Delegate appropriate Purview DLP administrative and investigation permissions addresses a different classification need. It does not demonstrate the investigation record contains the matching action, time, affected workload and scoped user.

D:

Add Endpoint DLP to the policy location and configure the supported print action does not demonstrate the classification result required here: the investigation record contains the matching action, time, affected workload and scoped user.

Question 374

The organization deployed this intervention: Enable appropriate DLP alerting and investigate events in the Microsoft Purview portal. For this scenario—A regulator needs records of DLP enforcement activity to support incident response.—which test is most relevant to acceptance?

  1. The case investigation attributes the final action to the correct rule and condition.
  2. The investigation record contains the matching action, time, affected workload and scoped user.
  3. The user sees actionable policy information on a blocked test action.
  4. Only scoped test users trigger the intended DLP response.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The investigation record contains the matching action, time, affected workload and scoped user. This observation most directly verifies the designed intervention: Enable appropriate DLP alerting and investigate events in the Microsoft Purview portal. The requirement being evaluated here is: A regulator needs records of DLP enforcement activity to support incident response.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The case investigation attributes the final action to the correct rule and condition serves a different requirement. It does not resolve the specific issue addressed by the investigation record contains the matching action, time, affected workload and scoped user.

C:

The user sees actionable policy information on a blocked test action. That evidence would matter for A service team wants users to understand why a message was blocked by a DLP policy. but the current implementation is Enable appropriate DLP alerting and investigate events in the Microsoft Purview portal. The requirement being evaluated here is: A regulator needs records of DLP enforcement activity to support incident response.

D:

Only scoped test users trigger the intended DLP response serves a different requirement. It does not resolve the specific issue addressed by the investigation record contains the matching action, time, affected workload and scoped user.

Question 375

Consider this Microsoft 365 security scenario: A second Microsoft 365 business unit reports the following protection gap: A regulator needs records of DLP enforcement activity to support incident response. It needs a configuration that can be tested without a tenant-wide change. Which administrative action is most appropriate?

  1. Delegate appropriate Purview DLP administrative and investigation permissions.
  2. Configure a DLP policy for SharePoint and OneDrive with user notifications and policy tips.
  3. Enable appropriate DLP alerting and investigate events in the Microsoft Purview portal.
  4. Configure a policy tip and supported user override with justification for the eligible DLP rule.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Enable appropriate DLP alerting and investigate events in the Microsoft Purview portal. This is the targeted administrative control for the described requirement. The planned verification is: The investigation record contains the matching action, time, affected workload and scoped user. The requirement being evaluated here is: A second Microsoft 365 business unit reports the following protection gap: A regulator needs records of DLP enforcement activity to support incident response. It needs a configuration that can be tested without a tenant-wide change.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Delegate appropriate Purview DLP administrative and investigation permissions addresses a different classification need. It does not demonstrate the investigation record contains the matching action, time, affected workload and scoped user.

B:

Configuring a DLP policy for SharePoint and OneDrive with user notifications and policy tips does not demonstrate the classification result required here: the investigation record contains the matching action, time, affected workload and scoped user.

D:

Configuring a policy tip and supported user override with justification for the eligible DLP rule addresses a different classification need. It does not demonstrate the investigation record contains the matching action, time, affected workload and scoped user.

Question 376

The requirement is: A second Microsoft 365 business unit reports the following protection gap: A regulator needs records of DLP enforcement activity to support incident response. It needs a configuration that can be tested without a tenant-wide change. The administrator implemented: Enable appropriate DLP alerting and investigate events in the Microsoft Purview portal. Which result would most directly verify success?

  1. The case investigation attributes the final action to the correct rule and condition.
  2. Only scoped test users trigger the intended DLP response.
  3. The user sees actionable policy information on a blocked test action.
  4. The investigation record contains the matching action, time, affected workload and scoped user.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

The investigation record contains the matching action, time, affected workload and scoped user. This result tests the required outcome for the selected control rather than an unrelated security capability. The requirement being evaluated here is: A second Microsoft 365 business unit reports the following protection gap: A regulator needs records of DLP enforcement activity to support incident response. It needs a configuration that can be tested without a tenant-wide change.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The case investigation attributes the final action to the correct rule and condition. That evidence would matter for A newly assigned security administrator inherits this open requirement: A DLP policy produces unexpected block results on a particular document. The team needs a supported control, not only a policy document. but the current implementation is Enable appropriate DLP alerting and investigate events in the Microsoft Purview portal. The requirement being evaluated here is: A second Microsoft 365 business unit reports the following protection gap: A regulator needs records of DLP enforcement activity to support incident response. It needs a configuration that can be tested without a tenant-wide change.

B:

Only scoped test users trigger the intended DLP response serves a different requirement. It does not resolve the specific issue addressed by the investigation record contains the matching action, time, affected workload and scoped user.

C:

The user sees actionable policy information on a blocked test action serves a different requirement. It does not resolve the specific issue addressed by the investigation record contains the matching action, time, affected workload and scoped user.

Question 377

A security team is reviewing the following situation: An enterprise wants to coordinate multiple DLP rules for regulated data and business exceptions. What should the administrator implement?

  1. Document rule conditions, exceptions and precedence before enabling enforcement.
  2. Examine sensitive type detection, policy scope, exceptions, matched rules and precedence.
  3. Refine sensitive info type choice, confidence and rule conditions rather than disable all DLP policies.
  4. Use DLP rule conditions with defined sensitive information type counts and groupings.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Document rule conditions, exceptions and precedence before enabling enforcement. The intervention addresses the specific classification or security decision being asked. The controlled acceptance condition is: A test matrix yields the anticipated response for each overlapping business case. The requirement being evaluated here is: An enterprise wants to coordinate multiple DLP rules for regulated data and business exceptions.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Examine sensitive type detection, policy scope, exceptions, matched rules and precedence addresses a different classification need. It does not demonstrate a test matrix yields the anticipated response for each overlapping business case.

C:

Refine sensitive info type choice, confidence and rule conditions rather than disable all DLP policies does not demonstrate the classification result required here: a test matrix yields the anticipated response for each overlapping business case.

D:

Using DLP rule conditions with defined sensitive information type counts and groupings addresses a different data-protection mechanism. It does not provide the specific safeguard required here: document rule conditions, exceptions and precedence before enabling enforcement.

Question 378

A security reviewer examines this implementation: Document rule conditions, exceptions and precedence before enabling enforcement. It addresses: An enterprise wants to coordinate multiple DLP rules for regulated data and business exceptions. Which evidence supports closure of the requirement?

  1. Only scoped test users trigger the intended DLP response.
  2. A test matrix yields the anticipated response for each overlapping business case.
  3. The case investigation attributes the final action to the correct rule and condition.
  4. The monitored file receives the configured safe response and event is recorded.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

A test matrix yields the anticipated response for each overlapping business case. This is the scenario-specific success signal for implementing: Document rule conditions, exceptions and precedence before enabling enforcement. The requirement being evaluated here is: An enterprise wants to coordinate multiple DLP rules for regulated data and business exceptions.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Only scoped test users trigger the intended DLP response serves a different requirement. It does not resolve the specific issue addressed by a test matrix yields the anticipated response for each overlapping business case.

C:

The case investigation attributes the final action to the correct rule and condition serves a different requirement. It does not resolve the specific issue addressed by a test matrix yields the anticipated response for each overlapping business case.

D:

The monitored file receives the configured safe response and event is recorded serves a different requirement. It does not resolve the specific issue addressed by a test matrix yields the anticipated response for each overlapping business case.

Question 379

Which approach most directly meets the requirement in this Microsoft Purview scenario? An admin plans to turn off DLP for all users because one exception caused a false positive.

  1. Run the DLP policy in an appropriate test mode and inspect matching events.
  2. Configure the DLP rule to inspect the supported sensitivity label condition.
  3. Refine the matching condition or targeted exception and rerun a pilot.
  4. Create DLP recipient-based exceptions or conditions for approved domains where supported.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Refine the matching condition or targeted exception and rerun a pilot. Verify with this outcome: Approved activity succeeds while the underlying high-risk disclosure is still prevented.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Running the DLP policy in an appropriate test mode and inspect matching events does not demonstrate the classification result required here: approved activity succeeds while the underlying high-risk disclosure is still prevented.

B:

Configuring the DLP rule to inspect the supported sensitivity label condition addresses a different data-protection mechanism. It does not provide the specific safeguard required here: refine the matching condition or targeted exception and rerun a pilot.

D:

Creating DLP recipient-based exceptions or conditions for approved domains where supported does not demonstrate the classification result required here: approved activity succeeds while the underlying high-risk disclosure is still prevented.

Question 380

The administrator applied this control: Refine the matching condition or targeted exception and rerun a pilot. The requirement is: An admin plans to turn off DLP for all users because one exception caused a false positive. What outcome should the team verify?

  1. An external sharing test is restricted while sanctioned internal collaboration still works.
  2. A user assigned the relevant risk level receives the intended differentiated DLP control.
  3. Real test records still match and false positives decrease.
  4. Approved activity succeeds while the underlying high-risk disclosure is still prevented.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Approved activity succeeds while the underlying high-risk disclosure is still prevented. This observation most directly verifies the designed intervention: Refine the matching condition or targeted exception and rerun a pilot. The requirement being evaluated here is: An admin plans to turn off DLP for all users because one exception caused a false positive.

Incorrect Answers

A:

An external sharing test is restricted while sanctioned internal collaboration still works serves a different requirement. It does not resolve the specific issue addressed by approved activity succeeds while the underlying high-risk disclosure is still prevented.

B:

A user assigned the relevant risk level receives the intended differentiated DLP control serves a different requirement. It does not resolve the specific issue addressed by approved activity succeeds while the underlying high-risk disclosure is still prevented.

C:

Real test records still match and false positives decrease. That evidence would matter for A security controls assessment returns an unmet item: An analyst sees false positives from a DLP policy matching ordinary invoice numbers. A reviewer asks for the most direct supported remediation in the relevant Purview workload. but the current implementation is Refine the matching condition or targeted exception and rerun a pilot. The requirement being evaluated here is: An admin plans to turn off DLP for all users because one exception caused a false positive.