Question 340
The requirement is: A security controls assessment returns an unmet item: An administrator needs to verify which Microsoft 365 storage locations a DLP policy actually protects. A reviewer asks for the most direct supported remediation in the relevant Purview workload. The administrator implemented: Review the policy's selected workloads, included locations and exclusions. Which result would most directly verify success?
Explanation
Correct Answer
The policy-location summary matches the approved Exchange and SharePoint scope. This result tests the required outcome for the selected control rather than an unrelated security capability. The requirement being evaluated here is: A security controls assessment returns an unmet item: An administrator needs to verify which Microsoft 365 storage locations a DLP policy actually protects. A reviewer asks for the most direct supported remediation in the relevant Purview workload.
Incorrect Answers
The simulation captures expected matches without enforcing a broad blocking policy. That evidence would matter for A controlled security trial has not resolved the following risk: A security team wants an audit-only rollout to quantify DLP rule matches before blocking collaboration. The next step should be a focused implementation and verification. but the current implementation is Review the policy's selected workloads, included locations and exclusions. The requirement being evaluated here is: A security controls assessment returns an unmet item: An administrator needs to verify which Microsoft 365 storage locations a DLP policy actually protects. A reviewer asks for the most direct supported remediation in the relevant Purview workload.
A sanctioned identifier sample matches while unrelated numbers do not satisfy the rule serves a different requirement. It does not resolve the specific issue addressed by the policy-location summary matches the approved Exchange and SharePoint scope.
A controlled violation generates the expected notification to authorized responders serves a different requirement. It does not resolve the specific issue addressed by the policy-location summary matches the approved Exchange and SharePoint scope.