McAfee-Secured Website

Exam Bundle

Exam Code: SC-401

Exam Name Administering Information Security in Microsoft 365

Certification Provider: Microsoft

Corresponding Certification: Microsoft Certified: Information Security Administrator Associate

Microsoft SC-401 Bundle $25.00
SC-401 Sample 1 SC-401 Sample 2 SC-401 Sample 3 SC-401 Sample 4 SC-401 Sample 5 SC-401 Sample 6 SC-401 Sample 7 SC-401 Sample 8 SC-401 Sample 9 SC-401 Sample 10

100% Microsoft SC-401 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real SC-401 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    SC-401 Questions & Answers

    291 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual SC-401 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • SC-401 Video Course

    SC-401 Video Course

    101 Video Lectures

    SC-401 Video Course is developed by Microsoft Professionals to help you pass the SC-401 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Administering Information Security in Microsoft 365 exam.

Administering Information Security in Microsoft 365 (SC-401) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $164.98
Bundle Price: $139.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    291 Questions

    $124.99
  • SC-401 Video Course

    Video Course

    101 Video Lectures

    $39.99

Microsoft SC-401 Practice Test 31

Question 300

A team selected the following control: Refine sensitive info type choice, confidence and rule conditions rather than disable all DLP policies. The business requirement is: A security controls assessment returns an unmet item: An analyst sees false positives from a DLP policy matching ordinary invoice numbers. A reviewer asks for the most direct supported remediation in the relevant Purview workload. Which observation best validates the outcome?

  1. An override request records a justification and the action follows the configured override policy.
  2. An external sharing test is restricted while sanctioned internal collaboration still works.
  3. Approved activity succeeds while the underlying high-risk disclosure is still prevented.
  4. Real test records still match and false positives decrease.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Real test records still match and false positives decrease. This is the scenario-specific success signal for implementing: Refine sensitive info type choice, confidence and rule conditions rather than disable all DLP policies. The requirement being evaluated here is: A security controls assessment returns an unmet item: An analyst sees false positives from a DLP policy matching ordinary invoice numbers. A reviewer asks for the most direct supported remediation in the relevant Purview workload.

Incorrect Answers

A:

An override request records a justification and the action follows the configured override policy serves a different requirement. It does not resolve the specific issue addressed by real test records still match and false positives decrease.

B:

An external sharing test is restricted while sanctioned internal collaboration still works. That evidence would matter for A controlled security trial has not resolved the following risk: An organization wishes to prevent external sharing of protected files stored in OneDrive without blocking internal access. The next step should be a focused implementation and verification. but the current implementation is Refine sensitive info type choice, confidence and rule conditions rather than disable all DLP policies. The requirement being evaluated here is: A security controls assessment returns an unmet item: An analyst sees false positives from a DLP policy matching ordinary invoice numbers. A reviewer asks for the most direct supported remediation in the relevant Purview workload.

C:

Approved activity succeeds while the underlying high-risk disclosure is still prevented serves a different requirement. It does not resolve the specific issue addressed by real test records still match and false positives decrease.

Question 301

An information security administrator faces this requirement: A firm must make one DLP rule block high-risk content but only warn on a smaller low-risk match. Which configuration best addresses the specified need?

  1. Configure separate ordered DLP rules using suitable conditions and actions.
  2. Refine sensitive info type choice, confidence and rule conditions rather than disable all DLP policies.
  3. Configure a DLP policy for SharePoint and OneDrive with user notifications and policy tips.
  4. Enable appropriate DLP alerting and investigate events in the Microsoft Purview portal.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Configure separate ordered DLP rules using suitable conditions and actions. Verify with this outcome: The stronger sample results in blocking while the less sensitive sample shows its warning.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Refine sensitive info type choice, confidence and rule conditions rather than disable all DLP policies addresses a different data-protection mechanism. It does not provide the specific safeguard required here: configure separate ordered DLP rules using suitable conditions and actions.

C:

Configuring a DLP policy for SharePoint and OneDrive with user notifications and policy tips addresses a different classification need. It does not demonstrate the stronger sample results in blocking while the less sensitive sample shows its warning.

D:

Enabling appropriate DLP alerting and investigate events in the Microsoft Purview portal does not demonstrate the classification result required here: the stronger sample results in blocking while the less sensitive sample shows its warning.

Question 302

The organization deployed this intervention: Configure separate ordered DLP rules using suitable conditions and actions. For this scenario—A firm must make one DLP rule block high-risk content but only warn on a smaller low-risk match.—which test is most relevant to acceptance?

  1. Matching cloud files surface in the corresponding Defender for Cloud Apps file policy results.
  2. The stronger sample results in blocking while the less sensitive sample shows its warning.
  3. The simulation captures expected matches without enforcing a broad blocking policy.
  4. A sanctioned identifier sample matches while unrelated numbers do not satisfy the rule.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The stronger sample results in blocking while the less sensitive sample shows its warning. This observation most directly verifies the designed intervention: Configure separate ordered DLP rules using suitable conditions and actions. The requirement being evaluated here is: A firm must make one DLP rule block high-risk content but only warn on a smaller low-risk match.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Matching cloud files surface in the corresponding Defender for Cloud Apps file policy results serves a different requirement. It does not resolve the specific issue addressed by the stronger sample results in blocking while the less sensitive sample shows its warning.

C:

The simulation captures expected matches without enforcing a broad blocking policy. That evidence would matter for A controlled security trial has not resolved the following risk: A security team wants an audit-only rollout to quantify DLP rule matches before blocking collaboration. The next step should be a focused implementation and verification. but the current implementation is Configure separate ordered DLP rules using suitable conditions and actions. The requirement being evaluated here is: A firm must make one DLP rule block high-risk content but only warn on a smaller low-risk match.

D:

A sanctioned identifier sample matches while unrelated numbers do not satisfy the rule serves a different requirement. It does not resolve the specific issue addressed by the stronger sample results in blocking while the less sensitive sample shows its warning.

Question 303

Consider this Microsoft 365 security scenario: A risk committee asks an implementation team to address the following operational constraint: A firm must make one DLP rule block high-risk content but only warn on a smaller low-risk match. Results must be checked with controlled sample activity. Which administrative action is most appropriate?

  1. Refine sensitive info type choice, confidence and rule conditions rather than disable all DLP policies.
  2. Delegate appropriate Purview DLP administrative and investigation permissions.
  3. Configure separate ordered DLP rules using suitable conditions and actions.
  4. Run the DLP policy in an appropriate test mode and inspect matching events.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Configure separate ordered DLP rules using suitable conditions and actions. This is the targeted administrative control for the described requirement. The planned verification is: The stronger sample results in blocking while the less sensitive sample shows its warning. The requirement being evaluated here is: A risk committee asks an implementation team to address the following operational constraint: A firm must make one DLP rule block high-risk content but only warn on a smaller low-risk match. Results must be checked with controlled sample activity.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Refine sensitive info type choice, confidence and rule conditions rather than disable all DLP policies addresses a different classification need. It does not demonstrate the stronger sample results in blocking while the less sensitive sample shows its warning.

B:

Delegate appropriate Purview DLP administrative and investigation permissions does not demonstrate the classification result required here: the stronger sample results in blocking while the less sensitive sample shows its warning.

D:

Running the DLP policy in an appropriate test mode and inspect matching events addresses a different classification need. It does not demonstrate the stronger sample results in blocking while the less sensitive sample shows its warning.

Question 304

The requirement is: A risk committee asks an implementation team to address the following operational constraint: A firm must make one DLP rule block high-risk content but only warn on a smaller low-risk match. Results must be checked with controlled sample activity. The administrator implemented: Configure separate ordered DLP rules using suitable conditions and actions. Which result would most directly verify success?

  1. Matching cloud files surface in the corresponding Defender for Cloud Apps file policy results.
  2. The simulation captures expected matches without enforcing a broad blocking policy.
  3. A sanctioned identifier sample matches while unrelated numbers do not satisfy the rule.
  4. The stronger sample results in blocking while the less sensitive sample shows its warning.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

The stronger sample results in blocking while the less sensitive sample shows its warning. This result tests the required outcome for the selected control rather than an unrelated security capability. The requirement being evaluated here is: A risk committee asks an implementation team to address the following operational constraint: A firm must make one DLP rule block high-risk content but only warn on a smaller low-risk match. Results must be checked with controlled sample activity.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Matching cloud files surface in the corresponding Defender for Cloud Apps file policy results. That evidence would matter for A pilot for the following business control has not yet shown effectiveness: A cloud security operator needs file-policy monitoring for sensitive documents in a connected SaaS app. The administrator must select a practical mechanism and test the outcome. but the current implementation is Configure separate ordered DLP rules using suitable conditions and actions. The requirement being evaluated here is: A risk committee asks an implementation team to address the following operational constraint: A firm must make one DLP rule block high-risk content but only warn on a smaller low-risk match. Results must be checked with controlled sample activity.

B:

The simulation captures expected matches without enforcing a broad blocking policy serves a different requirement. It does not resolve the specific issue addressed by the stronger sample results in blocking while the less sensitive sample shows its warning.

C:

A sanctioned identifier sample matches while unrelated numbers do not satisfy the rule serves a different requirement. It does not resolve the specific issue addressed by the stronger sample results in blocking while the less sensitive sample shows its warning.

Question 305

A security team is reviewing the following situation: An administrator finds two matching DLP rules with different actions for the same message. What should the administrator implement?

  1. Inspect DLP rule evaluation and precedence before changing the policy.
  2. Refine sensitive info type choice, confidence and rule conditions rather than disable all DLP policies.
  3. Configure a DLP policy for SharePoint and OneDrive with user notifications and policy tips.
  4. Delegate appropriate Purview DLP administrative and investigation permissions.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Inspect DLP rule evaluation and precedence before changing the policy. The intervention addresses the specific classification or security decision being asked. The controlled acceptance condition is: A controlled test reveals which applicable rule determines the effective action. The requirement being evaluated here is: An administrator finds two matching DLP rules with different actions for the same message.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Refine sensitive info type choice, confidence and rule conditions rather than disable all DLP policies addresses a different classification need. It does not demonstrate a controlled test reveals which applicable rule determines the effective action.

C:

Configuring a DLP policy for SharePoint and OneDrive with user notifications and policy tips does not demonstrate the classification result required here: a controlled test reveals which applicable rule determines the effective action.

D:

Delegate appropriate Purview DLP administrative and investigation permissions addresses a different data-protection mechanism. It does not provide the specific safeguard required here: inspect DLP rule evaluation and precedence before changing the policy.

Question 306

A security reviewer examines this implementation: Inspect DLP rule evaluation and precedence before changing the policy. It addresses: An administrator finds two matching DLP rules with different actions for the same message. Which evidence supports closure of the requirement?

  1. A controlled Teams message containing qualifying test information triggers the configured DLP action.
  2. A controlled test reveals which applicable rule determines the effective action.
  3. The case investigation attributes the final action to the correct rule and condition.
  4. The user sees actionable policy information on a blocked test action.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

A controlled test reveals which applicable rule determines the effective action. This is the scenario-specific success signal for implementing: Inspect DLP rule evaluation and precedence before changing the policy. The requirement being evaluated here is: An administrator finds two matching DLP rules with different actions for the same message.

Incorrect Answers

A:

A controlled Teams message containing qualifying test information triggers the configured DLP action serves a different requirement. It does not resolve the specific issue addressed by a controlled test reveals which applicable rule determines the effective action.

C:

The case investigation attributes the final action to the correct rule and condition serves a different requirement. It does not resolve the specific issue addressed by a controlled test reveals which applicable rule determines the effective action.

D:

The user sees actionable policy information on a blocked test action serves a different requirement. It does not resolve the specific issue addressed by a controlled test reveals which applicable rule determines the effective action.

Question 307

Which approach most directly meets the requirement in this Microsoft Purview scenario? A regional administrator encounters the following issue during deployment planning: An administrator finds two matching DLP rules with different actions for the same message. The solution should address the issue before broad rollout.

  1. Refine sensitive info type choice, confidence and rule conditions rather than disable all DLP policies.
  2. Enable appropriate DLP alerting and investigate events in the Microsoft Purview portal.
  3. Inspect DLP rule evaluation and precedence before changing the policy.
  4. Configure a DLP policy for SharePoint and OneDrive with user notifications and policy tips.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Inspect DLP rule evaluation and precedence before changing the policy. Verify with this outcome: A controlled test reveals which applicable rule determines the effective action.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Refine sensitive info type choice, confidence and rule conditions rather than disable all DLP policies does not demonstrate the classification result required here: a controlled test reveals which applicable rule determines the effective action.

B:

Enabling appropriate DLP alerting and investigate events in the Microsoft Purview portal addresses a different data-protection mechanism. It does not provide the specific safeguard required here: inspect DLP rule evaluation and precedence before changing the policy.

D:

Configuring a DLP policy for SharePoint and OneDrive with user notifications and policy tips does not demonstrate the classification result required here: a controlled test reveals which applicable rule determines the effective action.

Question 308

The administrator applied this control: Inspect DLP rule evaluation and precedence before changing the policy. The requirement is: A regional administrator encounters the following issue during deployment planning: An administrator finds two matching DLP rules with different actions for the same message. The solution should address the issue before broad rollout. What outcome should the team verify?

  1. A controlled Teams message containing qualifying test information triggers the configured DLP action.
  2. The case investigation attributes the final action to the correct rule and condition.
  3. The user sees actionable policy information on a blocked test action.
  4. A controlled test reveals which applicable rule determines the effective action.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

A controlled test reveals which applicable rule determines the effective action. This observation most directly verifies the designed intervention: Inspect DLP rule evaluation and precedence before changing the policy. The requirement being evaluated here is: A regional administrator encounters the following issue during deployment planning: An administrator finds two matching DLP rules with different actions for the same message. The solution should address the issue before broad rollout.

Incorrect Answers

A:

A controlled Teams message containing qualifying test information triggers the configured DLP action serves a different requirement. It does not resolve the specific issue addressed by a controlled test reveals which applicable rule determines the effective action.

B:

The case investigation attributes the final action to the correct rule and condition serves a different requirement. It does not resolve the specific issue addressed by a controlled test reveals which applicable rule determines the effective action.

C:

The user sees actionable policy information on a blocked test action serves a different requirement. It does not resolve the specific issue addressed by a controlled test reveals which applicable rule determines the effective action.

Question 309

The administrator must resolve the following protection gap: A regional business wants users to justify an allowed override for a DLP warning. Which action is the best fit?

  1. Configure a policy tip and supported user override with justification for the eligible DLP rule.
  2. Refine sensitive info type choice, confidence and rule conditions rather than disable all DLP policies.
  3. Enable appropriate DLP alerting and investigate events in the Microsoft Purview portal.
  4. Configure a DLP policy for SharePoint and OneDrive with user notifications and policy tips.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Configure a policy tip and supported user override with justification for the eligible DLP rule. This is the targeted administrative control for the described requirement. The planned verification is: An override request records a justification and the action follows the configured override policy. The requirement being evaluated here is: A regional business wants users to justify an allowed override for a DLP warning.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Refine sensitive info type choice, confidence and rule conditions rather than disable all DLP policies does not demonstrate the classification result required here: an override request records a justification and the action follows the configured override policy.

C:

Enabling appropriate DLP alerting and investigate events in the Microsoft Purview portal addresses a different data-protection mechanism. It does not provide the specific safeguard required here: configure a policy tip and supported user override with justification for the eligible DLP rule.

D:

Configuring a DLP policy for SharePoint and OneDrive with user notifications and policy tips addresses a different classification need. It does not demonstrate an override request records a justification and the action follows the configured override policy.

Question 310

The chosen administrative action is: Configure a policy tip and supported user override with justification for the eligible DLP rule. In the context of A regional business wants users to justify an allowed override for a DLP warning. Which result constitutes the best validation?

  1. The user sees actionable policy information on a blocked test action.
  2. An override request records a justification and the action follows the configured override policy.
  3. A controlled Teams message containing qualifying test information triggers the configured DLP action.
  4. A file carrying the protected label triggers the intended DLP action.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

An override request records a justification and the action follows the configured override policy. This result tests the required outcome for the selected control rather than an unrelated security capability. The requirement being evaluated here is: A regional business wants users to justify an allowed override for a DLP warning.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The user sees actionable policy information on a blocked test action. That evidence would matter for A service team wants users to understand why a message was blocked by a DLP policy. but the current implementation is Configure a policy tip and supported user override with justification for the eligible DLP rule. The requirement being evaluated here is: A regional business wants users to justify an allowed override for a DLP warning.

C:

A controlled Teams message containing qualifying test information triggers the configured DLP action serves a different requirement. It does not resolve the specific issue addressed by an override request records a justification and the action follows the configured override policy.

D:

A file carrying the protected label triggers the intended DLP action. That evidence would matter for A newly assigned security administrator inherits this open requirement: An organization wants DLP control over a particular labeled class of files rather than a text pattern. The team needs a supported control, not only a policy document. but the current implementation is Configure a policy tip and supported user override with justification for the eligible DLP rule. The requirement being evaluated here is: A regional business wants users to justify an allowed override for a DLP warning.