Exam Bundle

The app audience sees the intended revised report version. That check would be meaningful for the separate case: An app release updates one report but consumers still see an older version of the app. It would not directly verify this scenario's selected implementation: Separate development and production workspaces and govern promotion.

Configured refresh slots meet the capacity's actual limit and refresh history remains healthy. That check would be meaningful for the separate case: A source dataset is large and a team schedules more refreshes per day than the capacity permits. It would not directly verify this scenario's selected implementation: Separate development and production workspaces and govern promotion.

An unauthorized external address cannot bypass tenant sharing policy. That check would be meaningful for the separate case: An analyst plans to share a link with an external contractor but tenant policy restricts external sharing. It would not directly verify this scenario's selected implementation: Separate development and production workspaces and govern promotion.

Using 'Publish the report and its semantic model to the appropriate authorized workspace' supports the result 'The workspace lists the intended report and model with expected permissions' for An analyst built a PBIX file locally and wants it available to the Power BI service workspace. It does not implement 'Assign operational ownership, support contacts and approved access for the shared semantic model' or prove 'Authorized maintainers can manage refresh without depending on an absent employee' for this question.

'Configure recipient permissions before establishing subscriptions' is validated when 'Subscription delivery follows the intended allowed audience rather than exposing restricted content' for A support manager wants report subscriptions sent only to employees who already have access to the content. It does not demonstrate 'Authorized maintainers can manage refresh without depending on an absent employee', which requires 'Assign operational ownership, support contacts and approved access for the shared semantic model'.

A successful 'Use a supported publish/import workflow and verify the model bindings in the destination' would show 'The copied report still queries the intended semantic model and meets destination permissions' for An analyst needs a report copied to another team but must avoid breaking its model connection. This case needs 'Assign operational ownership, support contacts and approved access for the shared semantic model' and evidence that 'Authorized maintainers can manage refresh without depending on an absent employee', not the other outcome.

Subscription delivery follows the intended allowed audience rather than exposing restricted content. That check would be meaningful for the separate case: A support manager wants report subscriptions sent only to employees who already have access to the content. It would not directly verify this scenario's selected implementation: Assign operational ownership, support contacts and approved access for the shared semantic model.

The workspace lists the intended report and model with expected permissions. That check would be meaningful for the separate case: An analyst built a PBIX file locally and wants it available to the Power BI service workspace. It would not directly verify this scenario's selected implementation: Assign operational ownership, support contacts and approved access for the shared semantic model.

The copied report still queries the intended semantic model and meets destination permissions. That check would be meaningful for the separate case: An analyst needs a report copied to another team but must avoid breaking its model connection. It would not directly verify this scenario's selected implementation: Assign operational ownership, support contacts and approved access for the shared semantic model.

The check for 'Distinguish model data refresh from report and visual refresh, then refresh the necessary component' is 'A known changed record appears after the appropriate refresh action, without needless republishing' for A report's underlying model has been updated but the workspace consumers see stale cached visuals. That does not establish 'The consumer can view allowed content and cannot alter the shared semantic model'; the stated requirement calls for 'Use the app audience or appropriate Viewer/item permissions'.

'Review workspace items and document their type, owner and dependencies' addresses the mechanism measured by 'The inventory records each asset and its referenced semantic model without duplicates' for A workspace owns dashboards, semantic models and reports, and an audit needs a reliable inventory. The current outcome is 'The consumer can view allowed content and cannot alter the shared semantic model' after 'Use the app audience or appropriate Viewer/item permissions', which the distractor leaves unverified.

'The new report uses the same governed model identifier and approved measures' would demonstrate 'Create a thin report connected to the shared semantic model and publish it to the destination workspace' for A central team has a reusable model and wants an additional report using that model without duplicating it, but not 'The consumer can view allowed content and cannot alter the shared semantic model'. The latter requires 'Use the app audience or appropriate Viewer/item permissions' in this scenario.

A known changed record appears after the appropriate refresh action, without needless republishing. That check would be meaningful for the separate case: A report's underlying model has been updated but the workspace consumers see stale cached visuals. It would not directly verify this scenario's selected implementation: Use the app audience or appropriate Viewer/item permissions.

The inventory records each asset and its referenced semantic model without duplicates. That check would be meaningful for the separate case: A workspace owns dashboards, semantic models and reports, and an audit needs a reliable inventory. It would not directly verify this scenario's selected implementation: Use the app audience or appropriate Viewer/item permissions.

The new report uses the same governed model identifier and approved measures. That check would be meaningful for the separate case: A central team has a reusable model and wants an additional report using that model without duplicating it. It would not directly verify this scenario's selected implementation: Use the app audience or appropriate Viewer/item permissions.

Using 'Pin the desired report visual to a dashboard in the Power BI service' supports the result 'The dashboard tile shows the expected revenue summary and opens its source when selected' for An executive wants to pin a single revenue visual from a report to a lightweight dashboard tile. It does not implement 'Choose a supported refresh cadence within the current capacity and licensing limits' or prove 'Configured refresh slots meet the capacity's actual limit and refresh history remains healthy' for this question.

'Configure dashboard layout and tile placement for the intended audience' is validated when 'Critical metrics appear in the planned order with correct source associations' for A dashboard has many tiles but users need to reorganize them around high-priority operational metrics. It does not demonstrate 'Configured refresh slots meet the capacity's actual limit and refresh history remains healthy', which requires 'Choose a supported refresh cadence within the current capacity and licensing limits'.

A successful 'Create or configure an appropriate Power BI workspace and assign authorized roles' would show 'Only approved team members can edit workspace artifacts according to their assigned roles' for An analytics team needs a dedicated collaborative location for reports and semantic models with controlled members. This case needs 'Choose a supported refresh cadence within the current capacity and licensing limits' and evidence that 'Configured refresh slots meet the capacity's actual limit and refresh history remains healthy', not the other outcome.

Critical metrics appear in the planned order with correct source associations. That check would be meaningful for the separate case: A dashboard has many tiles but users need to reorganize them around high-priority operational metrics. It would not directly verify this scenario's selected implementation: Choose a supported refresh cadence within the current capacity and licensing limits.

The dashboard tile shows the expected revenue summary and opens its source when selected. That check would be meaningful for the separate case: An executive wants to pin a single revenue visual from a report to a lightweight dashboard tile. It would not directly verify this scenario's selected implementation: Choose a supported refresh cadence within the current capacity and licensing limits.

Only approved team members can edit workspace artifacts according to their assigned roles. That check would be meaningful for the separate case: An analytics team needs a dedicated collaborative location for reports and semantic models with controlled members. It would not directly verify this scenario's selected implementation: Choose a supported refresh cadence within the current capacity and licensing limits.

The check for 'Check sharing and tenant permissions before choosing the delivery method' is 'An unauthorized external address cannot bypass tenant sharing policy' for An analyst plans to share a link with an external contractor but tenant policy restricts external sharing. That does not establish 'The copied report still queries the intended semantic model and meets destination permissions'; the stated requirement calls for 'Use a supported publish/import workflow and verify the model bindings in the destination'.

'Configure a supported data alert on the eligible dashboard tile' addresses the mechanism measured by 'A controlled threshold test triggers the expected alert for the manager' for A manager wants email notifications whenever a KPI gauge passes a configured threshold. The current outcome is 'The copied report still queries the intended semantic model and meets destination permissions' after 'Use a supported publish/import workflow and verify the model bindings in the destination', which the distractor leaves unverified.

'App consumers can access packaged reports without Contributor rights in the workspace' would demonstrate 'Publish an app from the workspace for the approved audience', but not 'The copied report still queries the intended semantic model and meets destination permissions'. The latter requires 'Use a supported publish/import workflow and verify the model bindings in the destination' in this scenario.

App consumers can access packaged reports without Contributor rights in the workspace. That check would be meaningful for the separate case: A business unit wants to distribute a curated set of reports to consumers without granting everyone workspace editing permissions. It would not directly verify this scenario's selected implementation: Use a supported publish/import workflow and verify the model bindings in the destination.

A controlled threshold test triggers the expected alert for the manager. That check would be meaningful for the separate case: A manager wants email notifications whenever a KPI gauge passes a configured threshold. It would not directly verify this scenario's selected implementation: Use a supported publish/import workflow and verify the model bindings in the destination.

An unauthorized external address cannot bypass tenant sharing policy. That check would be meaningful for the separate case: An analyst plans to share a link with an external contractor but tenant policy restricts external sharing. It would not directly verify this scenario's selected implementation: Use a supported publish/import workflow and verify the model bindings in the destination.

Using 'Configure recipient permissions before establishing subscriptions' supports the result 'Subscription delivery follows the intended allowed audience rather than exposing restricted content' for A support manager wants report subscriptions sent only to employees who already have access to the content. It does not implement 'Distinguish model data refresh from report and visual refresh, then refresh the necessary component' or prove 'A known changed record appears after the appropriate refresh action, without needless republishing' for this question.

'Update or republish the app after publishing the revised workspace content' is validated when 'The app audience sees the intended revised report version' for An app release updates one report but consumers still see an older version of the app. It does not demonstrate 'A known changed record appears after the appropriate refresh action, without needless republishing', which requires 'Distinguish model data refresh from report and visual refresh, then refresh the necessary component'.

A successful 'Configure a Power BI subscription for the authorized recipient and schedule' would show 'The recipient receives the scheduled content under supported licensing and access rules' for A department wants a recurring emailed snapshot of a report every Monday. This case needs 'Distinguish model data refresh from report and visual refresh, then refresh the necessary component' and evidence that 'A known changed record appears after the appropriate refresh action, without needless republishing', not the other outcome.

The app audience sees the intended revised report version. That check would be meaningful for the separate case: An app release updates one report but consumers still see an older version of the app. It would not directly verify this scenario's selected implementation: Distinguish model data refresh from report and visual refresh, then refresh the necessary component.

The recipient receives the scheduled content under supported licensing and access rules. That check would be meaningful for the separate case: A department wants a recurring emailed snapshot of a report every Monday. It would not directly verify this scenario's selected implementation: Distinguish model data refresh from report and visual refresh, then refresh the necessary component.

Subscription delivery follows the intended allowed audience rather than exposing restricted content. That check would be meaningful for the separate case: A support manager wants report subscriptions sent only to employees who already have access to the content. It would not directly verify this scenario's selected implementation: Distinguish model data refresh from report and visual refresh, then refresh the necessary component.