Question 50
A session-cache workload needs low-latency access and can tolerate memory-optimized table constraints. Which verification finding is most specific to this scenario?
Explanation
Correct Answer
In-memory OLTP uses a different engine/index architecture and requires explicit feature/compatibility assessment. The observation “A load test shows reduced contention and recovery behavior consistent with the chosen durability” directly confirms the chosen action worked for this situation: A session-cache workload needs low-latency access and can tolerate memory-optimized table constraints.
Incorrect Answers
System time records database validity, not necessarily application-defined effective time. This observation would not establish that the required result occurred for A session-cache workload needs low-latency access and can tolerate memory-optimized table constraints. The confirming test is: A load test shows reduced contention and recovery behavior consistent with the chosen durability.
CHAR uses fixed-width padding; variable-width text types better fit identifiers whose lengths differ. This observation would not establish that the required result occurred for A session-cache workload needs low-latency access and can tolerate memory-optimized table constraints. The confirming test is: A load test shows reduced contention and recovery behavior consistent with the chosen durability.
Views can provide a data-access interface when underlying object permissions are managed appropriately. This observation would not establish that the required result occurred for A session-cache workload needs low-latency access and can tolerate memory-optimized table constraints. The confirming test is: A load test shows reduced contention and recovery behavior consistent with the chosen durability.