Question 90
An audit trail must show the user-declared effective time separately from when the database stored a row version. Which acceptance check should accompany the remediation?
Explanation
Correct Answer
System time records database validity, not necessarily application-defined effective time. The observation “Historical queries can distinguish transaction history from independently entered business-effective intervals” directly confirms the chosen action worked for this situation: An audit trail must show the user-declared effective time separately from when the database stored a row version.
Incorrect Answers
Indexing a computed JSON_VALUE expression can make frequently used scalar paths searchable on older engines. This observation would not establish that the required result occurred for An audit trail must show the user-declared effective time separately from when the database stored a row version. The confirming test is: Historical queries can distinguish transaction history from independently entered business-effective intervals.
A PRIMARY KEY guarantees unique non-null identity whereas a display label may change or duplicate. This observation would not establish that the required result occurred for An audit trail must show the user-declared effective time separately from when the database stored a row version. The confirming test is: Historical queries can distinguish transaction history from independently entered business-effective intervals.
Edit distance is a count-like difference measure, not a proof that two records are the same entity. This observation would not establish that the required result occurred for An audit trail must show the user-declared effective time separately from when the database stored a row version. The confirming test is: Historical queries can distinguish transaction history from independently entered business-effective intervals.