McAfee-Secured Website

Exam Bundle

Exam Code: HPE7-A08

Exam Name HPE Network Switching Professional

Certification Provider: HP

Corresponding Certification: HPE Aruba Networking Certified Professional - Switching

HP HPE7-A08 Bundle $19.99

100% HP HPE7-A08 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real HPE7-A08 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    HPE7-A08 Questions & Answers

    172 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual HPE7-A08 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • Study Guide

    HPE7-A08 Study Guide

    794 PDF Pages

    Developed by industry experts, this 794-page guide spells out in painstaking detail all of the information you need to ace HPE7-A08 exam.

HPE Network Switching Professional (HPE7-A08) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $154.98
Bundle Price: $134.99

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    172 Questions

    $124.99
  • Study Guide

    Study Guide

    794 PDF Pages

    $29.99

HP HPE7-A08 Practice Test 39

Question 380

At Northpoint Health, the remote-clinic systems team is preparing a rural site commissioning project. The operational constraint is remote support and access restrictions. The owner reports that the correction is complete for this issue: A VSX pair reports heartbeat/keepalive instability while its inter-switch data link remains operational. Which result BEST demonstrates that this specific issue was resolved?

  1. Interface flaps cease and link negotiation reports the supported common speed.
  2. Peer state remains healthy during controlled keepalive and ISL tests.
  3. Encapsulated packets at the intended size traverse the fabric without fragmentation-related loss.
  4. The restored software version passes the original service acceptance checks without losing saved configuration.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Peer state remains healthy during controlled keepalive and ISL tests. This is the relevant acceptance observation for the reported issue: A VSX pair reports heartbeat/keepalive instability while its inter-switch data link remains operational. The intended corrective choice is: Restore the properly isolated and reachable VSX keepalive path without routing it over the failing ISL. At Northpoint Health, this outcome verifies actual operation under remote support and access restrictions, rather than only a ticket marked complete.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Interface flaps cease and link negotiation reports the supported common speed. Such an observation would verify a separate issue: A copper uplink flaps because a port is hard-set to an incompatible speed while its neighbor autonegotiates. It would follow the distinct action: Align supported speed and autonegotiation settings and check copper media. Here the reported failure is A VSX pair reports heartbeat/keepalive instability while its inter-switch data link remains operational. The decisive result for Northpoint Health must instead be: Peer state remains healthy during controlled keepalive and ISL tests.

C:

Encapsulated packets at the intended size traverse the fabric without fragmentation-related loss. Such an observation would verify a separate issue: An overlay tunnel fails to carry otherwise valid tenant traffic when the underlay path has an insufficient MTU. It would follow the distinct action: Check encapsulation overhead and raise supported underlay MTU consistently along the path. Here the reported failure is A VSX pair reports heartbeat/keepalive instability while its inter-switch data link remains operational. The decisive result for Northpoint Health must instead be: Peer state remains healthy during controlled keepalive and ISL tests.

D:

The restored software version passes the original service acceptance checks without losing saved configuration. Such an observation would verify a separate issue: A software upgrade causes a critical feature regression and the runbook has no known working image ready. It would follow the distinct action: Apply the supported firmware rollback or recovery procedure using a verified compatible image and backup. Here the reported failure is A VSX pair reports heartbeat/keepalive instability while its inter-switch data link remains operational. The decisive result for Northpoint Health must instead be: Peer state remains healthy during controlled keepalive and ISL tests.

Question 381

At Riverton Utilities, the operations-center network team is preparing a dispatch network revision. The operational constraint is dispatch continuity under link failure. The site acceptance review finds: A VSX pair loses its inter-switch link and the recovery procedure risks dual-active forwarding. Which action BEST corrects the stated problem?

  1. Apply the supported firmware rollback or recovery procedure using a verified compatible image and backup.
  2. Follow the supported VSX ISL-failure and split-recovery procedure, restoring consistent peer connectivity and state.
  3. Check encapsulation overhead and raise supported underlay MTU consistently along the path.
  4. Align supported speed and autonegotiation settings and check copper media.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Follow the supported VSX ISL-failure and split-recovery procedure, restoring consistent peer connectivity and state. This response directly addresses the observed condition: A VSX pair loses its inter-switch link and the recovery procedure risks dual-active forwarding. For Riverton Utilities during a dispatch network revision, the decisive check is not merely that a configuration was entered: VSX peer and ISL status return to expected values without simultaneous conflicting forwarding. That evidence connects the proposed correction to measurable forwarding or management behavior.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Apply the supported firmware rollback or recovery procedure using a verified compatible image and backup. That relates to a different fault: A software upgrade causes a critical feature regression and the runbook has no known working image ready. The incident in the scenario is instead: A VSX pair loses its inter-switch link and the recovery procedure risks dual-active forwarding. Changing the unrelated setting does not establish the required repair at Riverton Utilities; the relevant confirmation would be: VSX peer and ISL status return to expected values without simultaneous conflicting forwarding.

C:

Check encapsulation overhead and raise supported underlay MTU consistently along the path. That relates to a different fault: An overlay tunnel fails to carry otherwise valid tenant traffic when the underlay path has an insufficient MTU. The incident in the scenario is instead: A VSX pair loses its inter-switch link and the recovery procedure risks dual-active forwarding. Changing the unrelated setting does not establish the required repair at Riverton Utilities; the relevant confirmation would be: VSX peer and ISL status return to expected values without simultaneous conflicting forwarding.

D:

Align supported speed and autonegotiation settings and check copper media. That relates to a different fault: A copper uplink flaps because a port is hard-set to an incompatible speed while its neighbor autonegotiates. The incident in the scenario is instead: A VSX pair loses its inter-switch link and the recovery procedure risks dual-active forwarding. Changing the unrelated setting does not establish the required repair at Riverton Utilities; the relevant confirmation would be: VSX peer and ISL status return to expected values without simultaneous conflicting forwarding.

Question 382

At Riverton Utilities, the operations-center network team is preparing a dispatch network revision. The operational constraint is dispatch continuity under link failure. A production-readiness reviewer asks for proof addressing: A VSX pair loses its inter-switch link and the recovery procedure risks dual-active forwarding. Which result BEST demonstrates that this specific issue was resolved?

  1. VSX peer and ISL status return to expected values without simultaneous conflicting forwarding.
  2. The restored software version passes the original service acceptance checks without losing saved configuration.
  3. Authorized endpoints follow documented fallback and unknown devices remain restricted during failover tests.
  4. A routed client completes DHCP lease acquisition and the relay forwards responses correctly.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

VSX peer and ISL status return to expected values without simultaneous conflicting forwarding. This is the relevant acceptance observation for the reported issue: A VSX pair loses its inter-switch link and the recovery procedure risks dual-active forwarding. The intended corrective choice is: Follow the supported VSX ISL-failure and split-recovery procedure, restoring consistent peer connectivity and state. At Riverton Utilities, this outcome verifies actual operation under dispatch continuity under link failure, rather than only a ticket marked complete.

Incorrect Answers

B:

The restored software version passes the original service acceptance checks without losing saved configuration. Such an observation would verify a separate issue: A software upgrade causes a critical feature regression and the runbook has no known working image ready. It would follow the distinct action: Apply the supported firmware rollback or recovery procedure using a verified compatible image and backup. Here the reported failure is A VSX pair loses its inter-switch link and the recovery procedure risks dual-active forwarding. The decisive result for Riverton Utilities must instead be: VSX peer and ISL status return to expected values without simultaneous conflicting forwarding.

C:

Authorized endpoints follow documented fallback and unknown devices remain restricted during failover tests. Such an observation would verify a separate issue: Wired authentication breaks during a RADIUS server outage and the design lacks a safe fallback policy. It would follow the distinct action: Configure an approved authentication failure behavior and available secondary RADIUS service rather than opening all ports. Here the reported failure is A VSX pair loses its inter-switch link and the recovery procedure risks dual-active forwarding. The decisive result for Riverton Utilities must instead be: VSX peer and ISL status return to expected values without simultaneous conflicting forwarding.

D:

A routed client completes DHCP lease acquisition and the relay forwards responses correctly. Such an observation would verify a separate issue: A client gateway forwards traffic but DHCP clients across a routed VLAN receive no offer from a remote server. It would follow the distinct action: Validate and correct DHCP relay/helper configuration and L3 reachability to the authorized server. Here the reported failure is A VSX pair loses its inter-switch link and the recovery procedure risks dual-active forwarding. The decisive result for Riverton Utilities must instead be: VSX peer and ISL status return to expected values without simultaneous conflicting forwarding.

Question 383

At Harborline Finance, the infrastructure security group is preparing a governed switching change. The operational constraint is least-privilege and audit retention. The network investigation identifies this condition: A VSX pair loses its inter-switch link and the recovery procedure risks dual-active forwarding. Which action BEST corrects the stated problem?

  1. Follow the supported VSX ISL-failure and split-recovery procedure, restoring consistent peer connectivity and state.
  2. Validate and correct DHCP relay/helper configuration and L3 reachability to the authorized server.
  3. Correct next-hop reachability or an appropriate supported next-hop policy within the routing design.
  4. Check encapsulation overhead and raise supported underlay MTU consistently along the path.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Follow the supported VSX ISL-failure and split-recovery procedure, restoring consistent peer connectivity and state. This response directly addresses the observed condition: A VSX pair loses its inter-switch link and the recovery procedure risks dual-active forwarding. For Harborline Finance during a governed switching change, the decisive check is not merely that a configuration was entered: VSX peer and ISL status return to expected values without simultaneous conflicting forwarding. That evidence connects the proposed correction to measurable forwarding or management behavior.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Validate and correct DHCP relay/helper configuration and L3 reachability to the authorized server. That relates to a different fault: A client gateway forwards traffic but DHCP clients across a routed VLAN receive no offer from a remote server. The incident in the scenario is instead: A VSX pair loses its inter-switch link and the recovery procedure risks dual-active forwarding. Changing the unrelated setting does not establish the required repair at Harborline Finance; the relevant confirmation would be: VSX peer and ISL status return to expected values without simultaneous conflicting forwarding.

C:

Correct next-hop reachability or an appropriate supported next-hop policy within the routing design. That relates to a different fault: BGP prefixes are visible from a peer but remain unusable because the advertised next-hop is unreachable. The incident in the scenario is instead: A VSX pair loses its inter-switch link and the recovery procedure risks dual-active forwarding. Changing the unrelated setting does not establish the required repair at Harborline Finance; the relevant confirmation would be: VSX peer and ISL status return to expected values without simultaneous conflicting forwarding.

D:

Check encapsulation overhead and raise supported underlay MTU consistently along the path. That relates to a different fault: An overlay tunnel fails to carry otherwise valid tenant traffic when the underlay path has an insufficient MTU. The incident in the scenario is instead: A VSX pair loses its inter-switch link and the recovery procedure risks dual-active forwarding. Changing the unrelated setting does not establish the required repair at Harborline Finance; the relevant confirmation would be: VSX peer and ISL status return to expected values without simultaneous conflicting forwarding.

Question 384

At Harborline Finance, the infrastructure security group is preparing a governed switching change. The operational constraint is least-privilege and audit retention. The owner reports that the correction is complete for this issue: A VSX pair loses its inter-switch link and the recovery procedure risks dual-active forwarding. Which result BEST demonstrates that this specific issue was resolved?

  1. Interface flaps cease and link negotiation reports the supported common speed.
  2. The restored software version passes the original service acceptance checks without losing saved configuration.
  3. VSX peer and ISL status return to expected values without simultaneous conflicting forwarding.
  4. Peer state remains healthy during controlled keepalive and ISL tests.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

VSX peer and ISL status return to expected values without simultaneous conflicting forwarding. This is the relevant acceptance observation for the reported issue: A VSX pair loses its inter-switch link and the recovery procedure risks dual-active forwarding. The intended corrective choice is: Follow the supported VSX ISL-failure and split-recovery procedure, restoring consistent peer connectivity and state. At Harborline Finance, this outcome verifies actual operation under least-privilege and audit retention, rather than only a ticket marked complete.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Interface flaps cease and link negotiation reports the supported common speed. Such an observation would verify a separate issue: A copper uplink flaps because a port is hard-set to an incompatible speed while its neighbor autonegotiates. It would follow the distinct action: Align supported speed and autonegotiation settings and check copper media. Here the reported failure is A VSX pair loses its inter-switch link and the recovery procedure risks dual-active forwarding. The decisive result for Harborline Finance must instead be: VSX peer and ISL status return to expected values without simultaneous conflicting forwarding.

B:

The restored software version passes the original service acceptance checks without losing saved configuration. Such an observation would verify a separate issue: A software upgrade causes a critical feature regression and the runbook has no known working image ready. It would follow the distinct action: Apply the supported firmware rollback or recovery procedure using a verified compatible image and backup. Here the reported failure is A VSX pair loses its inter-switch link and the recovery procedure risks dual-active forwarding. The decisive result for Harborline Finance must instead be: VSX peer and ISL status return to expected values without simultaneous conflicting forwarding.

D:

Peer state remains healthy during controlled keepalive and ISL tests. Such an observation would verify a separate issue: A VSX pair reports heartbeat/keepalive instability while its inter-switch data link remains operational. It would follow the distinct action: Restore the properly isolated and reachable VSX keepalive path without routing it over the failing ISL. Here the reported failure is A VSX pair loses its inter-switch link and the recovery procedure risks dual-active forwarding. The decisive result for Harborline Finance must instead be: VSX peer and ISL status return to expected values without simultaneous conflicting forwarding.

Question 385

At Lakeshore Education, the school network support crew is preparing a district-wide replacement program. The operational constraint is classroom outages kept within target. The site acceptance review finds: An access VSF member repeatedly fails to join after replacement because its stack/member configuration is inconsistent. Which action BEST corrects the stated problem?

  1. Verify compatible software, VSF link topology and assigned member identity before reintegration.
  2. Follow the supported VSX ISL-failure and split-recovery procedure, restoring consistent peer connectivity and state.
  3. Configure an approved authentication failure behavior and available secondary RADIUS service rather than opening all ports.
  4. Review rule match order, direction and the least-privilege exception, then repair the specific permit.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Verify compatible software, VSF link topology and assigned member identity before reintegration. This response directly addresses the observed condition: An access VSF member repeatedly fails to join after replacement because its stack/member configuration is inconsistent. For Lakeshore Education during a district-wide replacement program, the decisive check is not merely that a configuration was entered: The replacement reports expected stack membership and stable fabric connectivity. That evidence connects the proposed correction to measurable forwarding or management behavior.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Follow the supported VSX ISL-failure and split-recovery procedure, restoring consistent peer connectivity and state. That relates to a different fault: A VSX pair loses its inter-switch link and the recovery procedure risks dual-active forwarding. The incident in the scenario is instead: An access VSF member repeatedly fails to join after replacement because its stack/member configuration is inconsistent. Changing the unrelated setting does not establish the required repair at Lakeshore Education; the relevant confirmation would be: The replacement reports expected stack membership and stable fabric connectivity.

C:

Configure an approved authentication failure behavior and available secondary RADIUS service rather than opening all ports. That relates to a different fault: Wired authentication breaks during a RADIUS server outage and the design lacks a safe fallback policy. The incident in the scenario is instead: An access VSF member repeatedly fails to join after replacement because its stack/member configuration is inconsistent. Changing the unrelated setting does not establish the required repair at Lakeshore Education; the relevant confirmation would be: The replacement reports expected stack membership and stable fabric connectivity.

D:

Review rule match order, direction and the least-privilege exception, then repair the specific permit. That relates to a different fault: A recently added ACL denies a permitted monitoring flow to the management SVI. The incident in the scenario is instead: An access VSF member repeatedly fails to join after replacement because its stack/member configuration is inconsistent. Changing the unrelated setting does not establish the required repair at Lakeshore Education; the relevant confirmation would be: The replacement reports expected stack membership and stable fabric connectivity.

Question 386

At Lakeshore Education, the school network support crew is preparing a district-wide replacement program. The operational constraint is classroom outages kept within target. A production-readiness reviewer asks for proof addressing: An access VSF member repeatedly fails to join after replacement because its stack/member configuration is inconsistent. Which result BEST demonstrates that this specific issue was resolved?

  1. The next synchronization retains the approved local value and all mandated baseline settings.
  2. The replacement reports expected stack membership and stable fabric connectivity.
  3. Encapsulated packets at the intended size traverse the fabric without fragmentation-related loss.
  4. Authorized endpoints follow documented fallback and unknown devices remain restricted during failover tests.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The replacement reports expected stack membership and stable fabric connectivity. This is the relevant acceptance observation for the reported issue: An access VSF member repeatedly fails to join after replacement because its stack/member configuration is inconsistent. The intended corrective choice is: Verify compatible software, VSF link topology and assigned member identity before reintegration. At Lakeshore Education, this outcome verifies actual operation under classroom outages kept within target, rather than only a ticket marked complete.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The next synchronization retains the approved local value and all mandated baseline settings. Such an observation would verify a separate issue: A Central template overwrites a necessary switch-specific value during the nightly compliance push. It would follow the distinct action: Reconcile the device's approved exception with group-template variables and configuration ownership. Here the reported failure is An access VSF member repeatedly fails to join after replacement because its stack/member configuration is inconsistent. The decisive result for Lakeshore Education must instead be: The replacement reports expected stack membership and stable fabric connectivity.

C:

Encapsulated packets at the intended size traverse the fabric without fragmentation-related loss. Such an observation would verify a separate issue: An overlay tunnel fails to carry otherwise valid tenant traffic when the underlay path has an insufficient MTU. It would follow the distinct action: Check encapsulation overhead and raise supported underlay MTU consistently along the path. Here the reported failure is An access VSF member repeatedly fails to join after replacement because its stack/member configuration is inconsistent. The decisive result for Lakeshore Education must instead be: The replacement reports expected stack membership and stable fabric connectivity.

D:

Authorized endpoints follow documented fallback and unknown devices remain restricted during failover tests. Such an observation would verify a separate issue: Wired authentication breaks during a RADIUS server outage and the design lacks a safe fallback policy. It would follow the distinct action: Configure an approved authentication failure behavior and available secondary RADIUS service rather than opening all ports. Here the reported failure is An access VSF member repeatedly fails to join after replacement because its stack/member configuration is inconsistent. The decisive result for Lakeshore Education must instead be: The replacement reports expected stack membership and stable fabric connectivity.

Question 387

At Bluecrest Medical, the clinical network operations team is preparing a new outpatient-facility deployment. The operational constraint is uninterrupted voice and records access. The network investigation identifies this condition: An access VSF member repeatedly fails to join after replacement because its stack/member configuration is inconsistent. Which action BEST corrects the stated problem?

  1. Align supported speed and autonegotiation settings and check copper media.
  2. Restore the properly isolated and reachable VSX keepalive path without routing it over the failing ISL.
  3. Verify compatible software, VSF link topology and assigned member identity before reintegration.
  4. Validate and correct DHCP relay/helper configuration and L3 reachability to the authorized server.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Verify compatible software, VSF link topology and assigned member identity before reintegration. This response directly addresses the observed condition: An access VSF member repeatedly fails to join after replacement because its stack/member configuration is inconsistent. For Bluecrest Medical during a new outpatient-facility deployment, the decisive check is not merely that a configuration was entered: The replacement reports expected stack membership and stable fabric connectivity. That evidence connects the proposed correction to measurable forwarding or management behavior.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Align supported speed and autonegotiation settings and check copper media. That relates to a different fault: A copper uplink flaps because a port is hard-set to an incompatible speed while its neighbor autonegotiates. The incident in the scenario is instead: An access VSF member repeatedly fails to join after replacement because its stack/member configuration is inconsistent. Changing the unrelated setting does not establish the required repair at Bluecrest Medical; the relevant confirmation would be: The replacement reports expected stack membership and stable fabric connectivity.

B:

Restore the properly isolated and reachable VSX keepalive path without routing it over the failing ISL. That relates to a different fault: A VSX pair reports heartbeat/keepalive instability while its inter-switch data link remains operational. The incident in the scenario is instead: An access VSF member repeatedly fails to join after replacement because its stack/member configuration is inconsistent. Changing the unrelated setting does not establish the required repair at Bluecrest Medical; the relevant confirmation would be: The replacement reports expected stack membership and stable fabric connectivity.

D:

Validate and correct DHCP relay/helper configuration and L3 reachability to the authorized server. That relates to a different fault: A client gateway forwards traffic but DHCP clients across a routed VLAN receive no offer from a remote server. The incident in the scenario is instead: An access VSF member repeatedly fails to join after replacement because its stack/member configuration is inconsistent. Changing the unrelated setting does not establish the required repair at Bluecrest Medical; the relevant confirmation would be: The replacement reports expected stack membership and stable fabric connectivity.

Question 388

At Bluecrest Medical, the clinical network operations team is preparing a new outpatient-facility deployment. The operational constraint is uninterrupted voice and records access. The owner reports that the correction is complete for this issue: An access VSF member repeatedly fails to join after replacement because its stack/member configuration is inconsistent. Which result BEST demonstrates that this specific issue was resolved?

  1. The replacement reports expected stack membership and stable fabric connectivity.
  2. The transit adjacency forms and the missing route is learned without exposing edge neighbor formation.
  3. VSX peer and ISL status return to expected values without simultaneous conflicting forwarding.
  4. Interface flaps cease and link negotiation reports the supported common speed.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The replacement reports expected stack membership and stable fabric connectivity. This is the relevant acceptance observation for the reported issue: An access VSF member repeatedly fails to join after replacement because its stack/member configuration is inconsistent. The intended corrective choice is: Verify compatible software, VSF link topology and assigned member identity before reintegration. At Bluecrest Medical, this outcome verifies actual operation under uninterrupted voice and records access, rather than only a ticket marked complete.

Incorrect Answers

B:

The transit adjacency forms and the missing route is learned without exposing edge neighbor formation. Such an observation would verify a separate issue: An OSPF route disappears after an interface was made passive on a transit link. It would follow the distinct action: Restore OSPF adjacency participation where neighbors are required and keep passive only on edge subnets. Here the reported failure is An access VSF member repeatedly fails to join after replacement because its stack/member configuration is inconsistent. The decisive result for Bluecrest Medical must instead be: The replacement reports expected stack membership and stable fabric connectivity.

C:

VSX peer and ISL status return to expected values without simultaneous conflicting forwarding. Such an observation would verify a separate issue: A VSX pair loses its inter-switch link and the recovery procedure risks dual-active forwarding. It would follow the distinct action: Follow the supported VSX ISL-failure and split-recovery procedure, restoring consistent peer connectivity and state. Here the reported failure is An access VSF member repeatedly fails to join after replacement because its stack/member configuration is inconsistent. The decisive result for Bluecrest Medical must instead be: The replacement reports expected stack membership and stable fabric connectivity.

D:

Interface flaps cease and link negotiation reports the supported common speed. Such an observation would verify a separate issue: A copper uplink flaps because a port is hard-set to an incompatible speed while its neighbor autonegotiates. It would follow the distinct action: Align supported speed and autonegotiation settings and check copper media. Here the reported failure is An access VSF member repeatedly fails to join after replacement because its stack/member configuration is inconsistent. The decisive result for Bluecrest Medical must instead be: The replacement reports expected stack membership and stable fabric connectivity.

Question 389

At Fairmont Logistics, the distribution-center switching team is preparing a warehouse device rollout. The operational constraint is critical handheld scanner uptime. The site acceptance review finds: A recently added ACL denies a permitted monitoring flow to the management SVI. Which action BEST corrects the stated problem?

  1. Align supported speed and autonegotiation settings and check copper media.
  2. Review rule match order, direction and the least-privilege exception, then repair the specific permit.
  3. Correct next-hop reachability or an appropriate supported next-hop policy within the routing design.
  4. Restore the properly isolated and reachable VSX keepalive path without routing it over the failing ISL.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Review rule match order, direction and the least-privilege exception, then repair the specific permit. This response directly addresses the observed condition: A recently added ACL denies a permitted monitoring flow to the management SVI. For Fairmont Logistics during a warehouse device rollout, the decisive check is not merely that a configuration was entered: Approved monitoring succeeds while unauthorized management requests remain blocked. That evidence connects the proposed correction to measurable forwarding or management behavior.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Align supported speed and autonegotiation settings and check copper media. That relates to a different fault: A copper uplink flaps because a port is hard-set to an incompatible speed while its neighbor autonegotiates. The incident in the scenario is instead: A recently added ACL denies a permitted monitoring flow to the management SVI. Changing the unrelated setting does not establish the required repair at Fairmont Logistics; the relevant confirmation would be: Approved monitoring succeeds while unauthorized management requests remain blocked.

C:

Correct next-hop reachability or an appropriate supported next-hop policy within the routing design. That relates to a different fault: BGP prefixes are visible from a peer but remain unusable because the advertised next-hop is unreachable. The incident in the scenario is instead: A recently added ACL denies a permitted monitoring flow to the management SVI. Changing the unrelated setting does not establish the required repair at Fairmont Logistics; the relevant confirmation would be: Approved monitoring succeeds while unauthorized management requests remain blocked.

D:

Restore the properly isolated and reachable VSX keepalive path without routing it over the failing ISL. That relates to a different fault: A VSX pair reports heartbeat/keepalive instability while its inter-switch data link remains operational. The incident in the scenario is instead: A recently added ACL denies a permitted monitoring flow to the management SVI. Changing the unrelated setting does not establish the required repair at Fairmont Logistics; the relevant confirmation would be: Approved monitoring succeeds while unauthorized management requests remain blocked.

Question 390

At Fairmont Logistics, the distribution-center switching team is preparing a warehouse device rollout. The operational constraint is critical handheld scanner uptime. A production-readiness reviewer asks for proof addressing: A recently added ACL denies a permitted monitoring flow to the management SVI. Which result BEST demonstrates that this specific issue was resolved?

  1. The designated distribution root reappears and traffic follows the planned loop-free topology.
  2. Rogue offers are discarded while leases from the legitimate server still succeed.
  3. A routed client completes DHCP lease acquisition and the relay forwards responses correctly.
  4. Approved monitoring succeeds while unauthorized management requests remain blocked.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Approved monitoring succeeds while unauthorized management requests remain blocked. This is the relevant acceptance observation for the reported issue: A recently added ACL denies a permitted monitoring flow to the management SVI. The intended corrective choice is: Review rule match order, direction and the least-privilege exception, then repair the specific permit. At Fairmont Logistics, this outcome verifies actual operation under critical handheld scanner uptime, rather than only a ticket marked complete.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The designated distribution root reappears and traffic follows the planned loop-free topology. Such an observation would verify a separate issue: An unapproved access switch becomes MSTP root and shifts traffic through a low-capacity closet. It would follow the distinct action: Restore intended bridge priorities and MSTP region settings under controlled change. Here the reported failure is A recently added ACL denies a permitted monitoring flow to the management SVI. The decisive result for Fairmont Logistics must instead be: Approved monitoring succeeds while unauthorized management requests remain blocked.

B:

Rogue offers are discarded while leases from the legitimate server still succeed. Such an observation would verify a separate issue: A rogue DHCP server sends offers from an edge port after a security change accidentally marks that port trusted. It would follow the distinct action: Correct DHCP snooping trust on the untrusted edge and keep only validated server paths trusted. Here the reported failure is A recently added ACL denies a permitted monitoring flow to the management SVI. The decisive result for Fairmont Logistics must instead be: Approved monitoring succeeds while unauthorized management requests remain blocked.

C:

A routed client completes DHCP lease acquisition and the relay forwards responses correctly. Such an observation would verify a separate issue: A client gateway forwards traffic but DHCP clients across a routed VLAN receive no offer from a remote server. It would follow the distinct action: Validate and correct DHCP relay/helper configuration and L3 reachability to the authorized server. Here the reported failure is A recently added ACL denies a permitted monitoring flow to the management SVI. The decisive result for Fairmont Logistics must instead be: Approved monitoring succeeds while unauthorized management requests remain blocked.