McAfee-Secured Website

Exam Bundle

Exam Code: HPE7-A01

Exam Name HPE Network Campus Access Professional

Certification Provider: HP

Corresponding Certification: HPE Aruba Networking Certified Professional - Campus Access

HP HPE7-A01 Bundle $19.99
HPE7-A01 Sample 1 HPE7-A01 Sample 2 HPE7-A01 Sample 3 HPE7-A01 Sample 4 HPE7-A01 Sample 5 HPE7-A01 Sample 6 HPE7-A01 Sample 7 HPE7-A01 Sample 8 HPE7-A01 Sample 9 HPE7-A01 Sample 10

100% HP HPE7-A01 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real HPE7-A01 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    HPE7-A01 Questions & Answers

    161 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual HPE7-A01 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • Study Guide

    HPE7-A01 Study Guide

    1264 PDF Pages

    Developed by industry experts, this 1264-page guide spells out in painstaking detail all of the information you need to ace HPE7-A01 exam.

HPE Network Campus Access Professional (HPE7-A01) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $154.98
Bundle Price: $134.99

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    161 Questions

    $124.99
  • Study Guide

    Study Guide

    1264 PDF Pages

    $29.99

HP HPE7-A01 Practice Test 56

Question 550

During a planned campus-network change at a university faculty building in Boston, operators discover that the same physical link has peers configured for conflicting OSPF area identifiers. The design must preserve teaching tools and shared printers. Which test result most directly confirms the required behavior?

  1. Each VRF resolves only its authorized prefixes, with controlled tests proving isolation and allowed shared services
  2. The expected neighbor reaches the required state and the authorized OSPF routes enter the routing table
  3. The selected OSPF path reflects approved cost policy and a controlled link failure converges to the intended backup
  4. Neighbor route tables contain approved routes and do not receive protected management or unrelated tenant prefixes

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

This observation tests the OSPF neighbor prerequisites and states requirement at a university faculty building in Boston. The expected result is that the expected neighbor reaches the required state and the authorized OSPF routes enter the routing table. The necessary correction is to align OSPF participation, area, reachability and neighbor authentication before troubleshooting downstream learned routes; a saved configuration alone would not prove it is working. In this case, the observed fault is that the same physical link has peers configured for conflicting OSPF area identifiers.

Incorrect Answers

A:

At a university faculty building in Boston, this would verify VRF segmentation and routing isolation, not the failure reported in this scenario. The requested closure criterion instead concerns OSPF neighbor prerequisites and states: the expected neighbor reaches the required state and the authorized OSPF routes enter the routing table.

C:

At a university faculty building in Boston, this measures a different network requirement, OSPF path metric and convergence. The case describes that the same physical link has peers configured for conflicting OSPF area identifiers, so accepting this result would leave the primary fault without direct verification.

D:

At a university faculty building in Boston, this would verify Dynamic route filtering and redistribution, not the failure reported in this scenario. The requested closure criterion instead concerns OSPF neighbor prerequisites and states: the expected neighbor reaches the required state and the authorized OSPF routes enter the routing table.

Question 551

At a utility control office in Raleigh, engineers report that OSPF routes through a low-bandwidth WAN link despite an available faster internal path. The work affects monitoring dashboards and service desk access. What configuration or diagnostic step is the best next move?

  1. Install the correct destination prefix and reachable next hop, then validate route preference before expecting application reachability
  2. Verify OSPF costs and advertised prefix reachability on the intended paths, then tune metric or failover requirements
  3. Validate BGP neighbor reachability and the local/remote AS relationship, then confirm authorized prefix advertisement
  4. Align OSPF participation, area, reachability and neighbor authentication before troubleshooting downstream learned routes

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The crucial symptom at a utility control office in Raleigh is that OSPF routes through a low-bandwidth WAN link despite an available faster internal path. The best response is to verify OSPF costs and advertised prefix reachability on the intended paths, then tune metric or failover requirements. Confirm success by checking that the selected OSPF path reflects approved cost policy and a controlled link failure converges to the intended backup.

Incorrect Answers

A:

At a utility control office in Raleigh, that change is aimed at Static/default route and route preference, not at the actual fault: OSPF routes through a low-bandwidth WAN link despite an available faster internal path. A successful repair here must show that the selected OSPF path reflects approved cost policy and a controlled link failure converges to the intended backup.

C:

At a utility control office in Raleigh, the option addresses BGP peer state and AS compatibility rather than the reported issue. For the stated symptom, the expected evidence is that the selected OSPF path reflects approved cost policy and a controlled link failure converges to the intended backup.

D:

At a utility control office in Raleigh, that change is aimed at OSPF neighbor prerequisites and states, not at the actual fault: OSPF routes through a low-bandwidth WAN link despite an available faster internal path. A successful repair here must show that the selected OSPF path reflects approved cost policy and a controlled link failure converges to the intended backup.

Question 552

At a utility control office in Raleigh, engineers report that OSPF routes through a low-bandwidth WAN link despite an available faster internal path. The work affects monitoring dashboards and service desk access. What evidence should the engineer request after the repair?

  1. The expected neighbor reaches the required state and the authorized OSPF routes enter the routing table
  2. Each VRF resolves only its authorized prefixes, with controlled tests proving isolation and allowed shared services
  3. The selected OSPF path reflects approved cost policy and a controlled link failure converges to the intended backup
  4. The BGP session establishes and only the intended network prefixes appear with accepted next hops

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

This observation tests the OSPF path metric and convergence requirement at a utility control office in Raleigh. The expected result is that the selected OSPF path reflects approved cost policy and a controlled link failure converges to the intended backup. The necessary correction is to verify OSPF costs and advertised prefix reachability on the intended paths, then tune metric or failover requirements; a saved configuration alone would not prove it is working. In this case, the observed fault is that OSPF routes through a low-bandwidth WAN link despite an available faster internal path.

Incorrect Answers

A:

At a utility control office in Raleigh, the observation may be useful for a separate OSPF neighbor prerequisites and states test, but it does not establish that OSPF routes through a low-bandwidth WAN link despite an available faster internal path has been resolved. The relevant check is the OSPF path metric and convergence outcome.

B:

At a utility control office in Raleigh, this measures a different network requirement, VRF segmentation and routing isolation. The case describes that OSPF routes through a low-bandwidth WAN link despite an available faster internal path, so accepting this result would leave the primary fault without direct verification.

D:

At a utility control office in Raleigh, the observation may be useful for a separate BGP peer state and AS compatibility test, but it does not establish that OSPF routes through a low-bandwidth WAN link despite an available faster internal path has been resolved. The relevant check is the OSPF path metric and convergence outcome.

Question 553

During a planned campus-network change at an engineering school in Copenhagen, operators discover that OSPF routes through a low-bandwidth WAN link despite an available faster internal path. The design must preserve lab networks and WLAN testing. Which change most directly addresses the stated failure?

  1. Use explicit route filters or redistribution policy so only authorized prefixes cross routing-domain boundaries
  2. Align OSPF participation, area, reachability and neighbor authentication before troubleshooting downstream learned routes
  3. Install the correct destination prefix and reachable next hop, then validate route preference before expecting application reachability
  4. Verify OSPF costs and advertised prefix reachability on the intended paths, then tune metric or failover requirements

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

The crucial symptom at an engineering school in Copenhagen is that OSPF routes through a low-bandwidth WAN link despite an available faster internal path. The best response is to verify OSPF costs and advertised prefix reachability on the intended paths, then tune metric or failover requirements. Confirm success by checking that the selected OSPF path reflects approved cost policy and a controlled link failure converges to the intended backup.

Incorrect Answers

A:

At an engineering school in Copenhagen, that change is aimed at Dynamic route filtering and redistribution, not at the actual fault: OSPF routes through a low-bandwidth WAN link despite an available faster internal path. A successful repair here must show that the selected OSPF path reflects approved cost policy and a controlled link failure converges to the intended backup.

B:

Although this is a valid design approach for OSPF neighbor prerequisites and states in an appropriate case, it leaves the OSPF path metric and convergence dependency untested. The observed condition at an engineering school in Copenhagen is that OSPF routes through a low-bandwidth WAN link despite an available faster internal path.

C:

At an engineering school in Copenhagen, the option addresses Static/default route and route preference rather than the reported issue. For the stated symptom, the expected evidence is that the selected OSPF path reflects approved cost policy and a controlled link failure converges to the intended backup.

Question 554

During a planned campus-network change at an engineering school in Copenhagen, operators discover that OSPF routes through a low-bandwidth WAN link despite an available faster internal path. The design must preserve lab networks and WLAN testing. Which post-change observation is the strongest acceptance evidence?

  1. DHCP broadcasts reach the approved remote server through relay and clients receive valid leases with their intended options
  2. The expected neighbor reaches the required state and the authorized OSPF routes enter the routing table
  3. The selected OSPF path reflects approved cost policy and a controlled link failure converges to the intended backup
  4. The intended destination resolves through the authorized next hop and no unwanted default-route black hole remains

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

This observation tests the OSPF path metric and convergence requirement at an engineering school in Copenhagen. The expected result is that the selected OSPF path reflects approved cost policy and a controlled link failure converges to the intended backup. The necessary correction is to verify OSPF costs and advertised prefix reachability on the intended paths, then tune metric or failover requirements; a saved configuration alone would not prove it is working. In this case, the observed fault is that OSPF routes through a low-bandwidth WAN link despite an available faster internal path.

Incorrect Answers

A:

At an engineering school in Copenhagen, the observation may be useful for a separate DHCP relay and inter-subnet services test, but it does not establish that OSPF routes through a low-bandwidth WAN link despite an available faster internal path has been resolved. The relevant check is the OSPF path metric and convergence outcome.

B:

At an engineering school in Copenhagen, this measures a different network requirement, OSPF neighbor prerequisites and states. The case describes that OSPF routes through a low-bandwidth WAN link despite an available faster internal path, so accepting this result would leave the primary fault without direct verification.

D:

At an engineering school in Copenhagen, the observation may be useful for a separate Static/default route and route preference test, but it does not establish that OSPF routes through a low-bandwidth WAN link despite an available faster internal path has been resolved. The relevant check is the OSPF path metric and convergence outcome.

Question 555

At a financial services campus in Zurich, engineers report that an engineer increases interface cost on the desired primary route instead of reducing its relative preference. The work affects transaction processing and secure terminals. Which implementation choice meets this requirement without broadening access?

  1. Use explicit route filters or redistribution policy so only authorized prefixes cross routing-domain boundaries
  2. Install the correct destination prefix and reachable next hop, then validate route preference before expecting application reachability
  3. Verify OSPF costs and advertised prefix reachability on the intended paths, then tune metric or failover requirements
  4. Assign routed interfaces and routes to their intended VRFs and use only explicitly approved cross-VRF connectivity

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

The crucial symptom at a financial services campus in Zurich is that an engineer increases interface cost on the desired primary route instead of reducing its relative preference. The best response is to verify OSPF costs and advertised prefix reachability on the intended paths, then tune metric or failover requirements. Confirm success by checking that the selected OSPF path reflects approved cost policy and a controlled link failure converges to the intended backup.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Although this is a valid design approach for Dynamic route filtering and redistribution in an appropriate case, it leaves the OSPF path metric and convergence dependency untested. The observed condition at a financial services campus in Zurich is that an engineer increases interface cost on the desired primary route instead of reducing its relative preference.

B:

At a financial services campus in Zurich, the option addresses Static/default route and route preference rather than the reported issue. For the stated symptom, the expected evidence is that the selected OSPF path reflects approved cost policy and a controlled link failure converges to the intended backup.

D:

Although this is a valid design approach for VRF segmentation and routing isolation in an appropriate case, it leaves the OSPF path metric and convergence dependency untested. The observed condition at a financial services campus in Zurich is that an engineer increases interface cost on the desired primary route instead of reducing its relative preference.

Question 556

At a financial services campus in Zurich, engineers report that an engineer increases interface cost on the desired primary route instead of reducing its relative preference. The work affects transaction processing and secure terminals. Which test result most directly confirms the required behavior?

  1. The intended destination resolves through the authorized next hop and no unwanted default-route black hole remains
  2. The expected neighbor reaches the required state and the authorized OSPF routes enter the routing table
  3. The selected OSPF path reflects approved cost policy and a controlled link failure converges to the intended backup
  4. Each VRF resolves only its authorized prefixes, with controlled tests proving isolation and allowed shared services

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

This observation tests the OSPF path metric and convergence requirement at a financial services campus in Zurich. The expected result is that the selected OSPF path reflects approved cost policy and a controlled link failure converges to the intended backup. The necessary correction is to verify OSPF costs and advertised prefix reachability on the intended paths, then tune metric or failover requirements; a saved configuration alone would not prove it is working. In this case, the observed fault is that an engineer increases interface cost on the desired primary route instead of reducing its relative preference.

Incorrect Answers

A:

At a financial services campus in Zurich, this measures a different network requirement, Static/default route and route preference. The case describes that an engineer increases interface cost on the desired primary route instead of reducing its relative preference, so accepting this result would leave the primary fault without direct verification.

B:

At a financial services campus in Zurich, this would verify OSPF neighbor prerequisites and states, not the failure reported in this scenario. The requested closure criterion instead concerns OSPF path metric and convergence: the selected OSPF path reflects approved cost policy and a controlled link failure converges to the intended backup.

D:

At a financial services campus in Zurich, this measures a different network requirement, VRF segmentation and routing isolation. The case describes that an engineer increases interface cost on the desired primary route instead of reducing its relative preference, so accepting this result would leave the primary fault without direct verification.

Question 557

During a planned campus-network change at a public library in Portland, operators discover that an engineer increases interface cost on the desired primary route instead of reducing its relative preference. The design must preserve staff and visitor wireless access. What configuration or diagnostic step is the best next move?

  1. Configure DHCP relay on the correct routed client VLAN interface toward the authorized server and verify return-path reachability
  2. Assign routed interfaces and routes to their intended VRFs and use only explicitly approved cross-VRF connectivity
  3. Verify OSPF costs and advertised prefix reachability on the intended paths, then tune metric or failover requirements
  4. Align OSPF participation, area, reachability and neighbor authentication before troubleshooting downstream learned routes

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

The crucial symptom at a public library in Portland is that an engineer increases interface cost on the desired primary route instead of reducing its relative preference. The best response is to verify OSPF costs and advertised prefix reachability on the intended paths, then tune metric or failover requirements. Confirm success by checking that the selected OSPF path reflects approved cost policy and a controlled link failure converges to the intended backup.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Although this is a valid design approach for DHCP relay and inter-subnet services in an appropriate case, it leaves the OSPF path metric and convergence dependency untested. The observed condition at a public library in Portland is that an engineer increases interface cost on the desired primary route instead of reducing its relative preference.

B:

At a public library in Portland, the option addresses VRF segmentation and routing isolation rather than the reported issue. For the stated symptom, the expected evidence is that the selected OSPF path reflects approved cost policy and a controlled link failure converges to the intended backup.

D:

Although this is a valid design approach for OSPF neighbor prerequisites and states in an appropriate case, it leaves the OSPF path metric and convergence dependency untested. The observed condition at a public library in Portland is that an engineer increases interface cost on the desired primary route instead of reducing its relative preference.

Question 558

During a planned campus-network change at a public library in Portland, operators discover that an engineer increases interface cost on the desired primary route instead of reducing its relative preference. The design must preserve staff and visitor wireless access. What evidence should the engineer request after the repair?

  1. The intended destination resolves through the authorized next hop and no unwanted default-route black hole remains
  2. The BGP session establishes and only the intended network prefixes appear with accepted next hops
  3. The expected neighbor reaches the required state and the authorized OSPF routes enter the routing table
  4. The selected OSPF path reflects approved cost policy and a controlled link failure converges to the intended backup

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

This observation tests the OSPF path metric and convergence requirement at a public library in Portland. The expected result is that the selected OSPF path reflects approved cost policy and a controlled link failure converges to the intended backup. The necessary correction is to verify OSPF costs and advertised prefix reachability on the intended paths, then tune metric or failover requirements; a saved configuration alone would not prove it is working. In this case, the observed fault is that an engineer increases interface cost on the desired primary route instead of reducing its relative preference.

Incorrect Answers

A:

At a public library in Portland, this measures a different network requirement, Static/default route and route preference. The case describes that an engineer increases interface cost on the desired primary route instead of reducing its relative preference, so accepting this result would leave the primary fault without direct verification.

B:

At a public library in Portland, this would verify BGP peer state and AS compatibility, not the failure reported in this scenario. The requested closure criterion instead concerns OSPF path metric and convergence: the selected OSPF path reflects approved cost policy and a controlled link failure converges to the intended backup.

C:

At a public library in Portland, the observation may be useful for a separate OSPF neighbor prerequisites and states test, but it does not establish that an engineer increases interface cost on the desired primary route instead of reducing its relative preference has been resolved. The relevant check is the OSPF path metric and convergence outcome.

Question 559

At a regional hospital campus in Richmond, engineers report that two OSPF neighbors are Full but the necessary service prefix is not advertised. The work affects clinical scheduling and bedside devices. Which change most directly addresses the stated failure?

  1. Assign routed interfaces and routes to their intended VRFs and use only explicitly approved cross-VRF connectivity
  2. Verify OSPF costs and advertised prefix reachability on the intended paths, then tune metric or failover requirements
  3. Validate BGP neighbor reachability and the local/remote AS relationship, then confirm authorized prefix advertisement
  4. Configure DHCP relay on the correct routed client VLAN interface toward the authorized server and verify return-path reachability

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The crucial symptom at a regional hospital campus in Richmond is that two OSPF neighbors are Full but the necessary service prefix is not advertised. The best response is to verify OSPF costs and advertised prefix reachability on the intended paths, then tune metric or failover requirements. Confirm success by checking that the selected OSPF path reflects approved cost policy and a controlled link failure converges to the intended backup.

Incorrect Answers

A:

At a regional hospital campus in Richmond, the option addresses VRF segmentation and routing isolation rather than the reported issue. For the stated symptom, the expected evidence is that the selected OSPF path reflects approved cost policy and a controlled link failure converges to the intended backup.

C:

Although this is a valid design approach for BGP peer state and AS compatibility in an appropriate case, it leaves the OSPF path metric and convergence dependency untested. The observed condition at a regional hospital campus in Richmond is that two OSPF neighbors are Full but the necessary service prefix is not advertised.

D:

At a regional hospital campus in Richmond, the option addresses DHCP relay and inter-subnet services rather than the reported issue. For the stated symptom, the expected evidence is that the selected OSPF path reflects approved cost policy and a controlled link failure converges to the intended backup.

Question 560

At a regional hospital campus in Richmond, engineers report that two OSPF neighbors are Full but the necessary service prefix is not advertised. The work affects clinical scheduling and bedside devices. Which post-change observation is the strongest acceptance evidence?

  1. The selected OSPF path reflects approved cost policy and a controlled link failure converges to the intended backup
  2. Each VRF resolves only its authorized prefixes, with controlled tests proving isolation and allowed shared services
  3. The intended destination resolves through the authorized next hop and no unwanted default-route black hole remains
  4. The BGP session establishes and only the intended network prefixes appear with accepted next hops

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

This observation tests the OSPF path metric and convergence requirement at a regional hospital campus in Richmond. The expected result is that the selected OSPF path reflects approved cost policy and a controlled link failure converges to the intended backup. The necessary correction is to verify OSPF costs and advertised prefix reachability on the intended paths, then tune metric or failover requirements; a saved configuration alone would not prove it is working. In this case, the observed fault is that two OSPF neighbors are Full but the necessary service prefix is not advertised.

Incorrect Answers

B:

At a regional hospital campus in Richmond, the observation may be useful for a separate VRF segmentation and routing isolation test, but it does not establish that two OSPF neighbors are Full but the necessary service prefix is not advertised has been resolved. The relevant check is the OSPF path metric and convergence outcome.

C:

At a regional hospital campus in Richmond, this measures a different network requirement, Static/default route and route preference. The case describes that two OSPF neighbors are Full but the necessary service prefix is not advertised, so accepting this result would leave the primary fault without direct verification.

D:

At a regional hospital campus in Richmond, this would verify BGP peer state and AS compatibility, not the failure reported in this scenario. The requested closure criterion instead concerns OSPF path metric and convergence: the selected OSPF path reflects approved cost policy and a controlled link failure converges to the intended backup.