Question 680
At Oakridge Public Services, the data science operations team maintains public service intake and case-priority models under requirements for fair evaluation and defensible monitoring. The ML reliability team requests proof of the remediation for: A cross-account promotion pipeline copies model artifacts but loses the KMS permissions required for the destination account to load them. Which observed result BEST demonstrates that the correction works?
Explanation
Correct Answer
A destination test role retrieves the artifact and decrypts it while an unrelated account remains denied. This is observable proof for correction of: A cross-account promotion pipeline copies model artifacts but loses the KMS permissions required for the destination account to load them. The approved design change is: Design the artifact sharing, replication and KMS policies explicitly for each trusted cross-account stage. The Oakridge Public Services acceptance test separates measured ML behavior from an unverified implementation claim.
Incorrect Answers
A staged rollback restores the approved prior model version and representative requests return to baseline behavior. This would verify a different operation: Maintain versioned model artifacts and use a controlled deployment strategy with retained previous endpoint configuration. That separate action addresses: A production team deploys an updated fraud model by replacing the only model artifact, leaving no usable rollback option. It cannot establish the required Oakridge Public Services correction for: A cross-account promotion pipeline copies model artifacts but loses the KMS permissions required for the destination account to load them. The decisive acceptance check is instead: A destination test role retrieves the artifact and decrypts it while an unrelated account remains denied.
A clean model endpoint starts on the intended instance and no executable-format error appears in the startup logs. This would verify a different operation: Build and publish a runtime image for the target supported architecture and pin matching instance and container metadata. That separate action addresses: An inference platform chooses an EC2 instance family without ensuring that the container architecture matches its CPU instruction set. It cannot establish the required Oakridge Public Services correction for: A cross-account promotion pipeline copies model artifacts but loses the KMS permissions required for the destination account to load them. The decisive acceptance check is instead: A destination test role retrieves the artifact and decrypts it while an unrelated account remains denied.
A known request traverses the versioned preprocessing and prediction stages and produces the expected output after deployment. This would verify a different operation: Use a supported SageMaker inference pipeline or reviewed multi-container design with compatible input and output contracts. That separate action addresses: An inference service chains preprocessing and prediction in application code that cannot be versioned with the SageMaker deployed model. It cannot establish the required Oakridge Public Services correction for: A cross-account promotion pipeline copies model artifacts but loses the KMS permissions required for the destination account to load them. The decisive acceptance check is instead: A destination test role retrieves the artifact and decrypts it while an unrelated account remains denied.